German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Retaining Wall analysis . The migration factor problem
- Thread starter xalox
- Start date
erhanbaytak
New Member
Does the Side Parcel belong to the project owner? If it does not belong to the project owner, you can prevent the tipping by obtaining a consent letter from the owner of the adjacent parcel by keeping the rear shoes of the retaining wall underground. If you say that you cannot extend the shoes to the side parcel in any way, you have to extend your front shoes a little more towards your own parcel. In addition, the installations of the system you are currently working on are set by default. If you calculate the downloads in the place where you will solve the problem and install accordingly, you will fix the problem.
"erhanbaytak":2x3euupw" said:Does the Side Parcel belong to the project owner? right. cohesion : 200 - 300 kpa internal friction angle : 25 - 35 unit volume weight : 2 t/m^3 values by unit conversion, of course I entered. Again huge dimensions appear. Do you think I am making another mistake where I do not know?
Levent Özpak
New Member
Hello, Enter the soil load information on the retaining wall by accepting the right side of the wall as active and the left side as passive. You can dissolve the retaining wall for a length of 1 meter and make other necessary arrangements on the drawings. If there is anything unclear, you can contact us by phone. 0.224-220 67 17"xalox":ctju058w" said:the side parcel does not belong to the project owner and we cannot get a consent letter. my geology engineer are the parameters i got. cohesion : 200 - 300 kpa internal friction angle : 25 - 35 unit volume weight : 2 t/m^3 values, of course, by converting units. huge sizes again. Do you think I'm making another mistake where I don't know? thanks..."erhanbaytak":ctju058w" said:Does the Side Plot belong to the project owner? If it does not belong to the project owner, you can prevent the tipping by obtaining a consent letter from the owner of the adjacent parcel by keeping the rear shoes of the retaining wall underground. If you say that you cannot extend the shoes to the side parcel in any way, you have to extend your front shoes a little more towards your own parcel. In addition, the installations of the system you are currently working on are set by default. If you calculate the loadings in the place where you will solve the problem and load accordingly, you will fix the problem.
The foundation of 4.5 meters of retaining is 1.15 m. No way. As a first approach, it should be like 40-70% (Kanyak Reinforced Concrete book - Zekai Celep). It's like 1.8-3.15. You cannot enter the next parcel. You can make a foundation of 2.5-3 meters. If the internal friction angle is 25-35, you can get 35. Since it is already U-shaped, yours is a more stable system than a normal long retaining wall.
izmirlimuhendis
New Member
well, there is this. I think you have taken the soil height on the active side less than the elevations. But in practice this is never the case. The jeans are changing, they are filling extra, someone is coming and planting a tree. So my advice is to get padding as much as the retaining height. The same goes for the passive side. On the passive side, you got some padding on the Shoe, but let's see if that padding will be in practice. I think they should be taken into account as well. These should also be taken into account. Nothing happens as planned in my beloved's hometown.