retaining curtain error

The active soil level should be more than 1 m in your example. I got the report that I added the active soil level to 1.5 m. You must ensure the safety of tipping by playing with the dimensions.
 
The issue I'm having trouble understanding is; While the active soil height is 3.5m, why does it not save even though there is no pressure (when the soil height is 0). Is there an error in the program here? As an engineer, when you look at the retaining curtain that I have attached, does it make sense to you that this building would topple?
 
Even when the ground level is 1 m, it does not save from tipping anyway. There were strange figures in the report when the ground level was 1m. It doesn't save even when the ground level is 1.5 m, but figures like 1 # have improved in the report. You control it manually. See the report. It is very clear how the calculation is done. Tell ideYapı that it should save here, but it does not. If it saves when you calculate it, of course. There is no place for such roundabouts in engineering. It either saves or it does not. It has to save , not just engineering terminology. Good luck with
 
Here, the overturning moments are negative. In this strange example, the overthrowing forces are the forces that resist tipping. Actually, your weird retaining wall isn't tipping over on the very safe side. The program says insecure on negative numbers as well. Let ideYAPI fix this. In fact, Boyle did not foresee that a strange retaining wall would be built. As you said, this retaining wall is actually safer than the earth effect wall.
 
"zeki78":2hejchf4" said:
the issue that I have trouble understanding is; why it saves at 3.5m active ground height, why it does not save even though there is no pressure (when soil height is 0). Is there any mistake in the program here? When you look at it, does it make sense to you that this structure would topple.
Click to expand...
Hello Zeki, Since the soil height is not predicted to be zero when defining the retaining wall, undefined values appear in the reinforced concrete dialog after the analysis. The other situation is that when we enter 1m soil height on the retaining wall, the overturning moments reach negative values, The retaining wall you have defined is due to the fact that the shoe and base tooth cross-sections are too much and the overturning force caused by the soil thrust is too low. The retaining wall you defined is in an extremely safe condition. However, we receive a warning in the tipping safety control because it is not foreseen in such a case. We have included these two cases in our error list. short Necessary corrections will be made in due time. Good work.
 
Dear Mr. Cassabotanic and Mr. Yasin, thank you for your interest. Of course, it is illogical to make such a retaining screen. In the problem I faced; My retaining screen was saving when the retaining wall and active ground height were equal, but it gave an error when I entered the active ground height lower than the retaining wall height. I just gave an exaggerated example to express the problem I see in idecad's retaining screen analysis. Good luck with
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top