Relative floor-to-floor drift problem

I reviewed your project. You complain about the relative story drift, but your static design is unfortunately not very good. You have curtains in one direction, the other direction is insufficient in terms of vertical carrier. There are 3 columns in all, and they are connected to each other in a single span with 35 beams. At least connect the columns to the curtains, at least you will include the curtains in the work, and you will also shorten the beam lengths. Note the continuities in the beams. If I didn't guess wrong, you should put a vertical curtain in the place where the elevator bucket is located so that your rigidity in the Y direction will increase. how logical is it to bypass the curtain and connect the beam to the other end of the building? I tried to fix things without touching the core of your project, but in the end, this should not be a static design. You should talk to your architect and get some flexibility. In addition, I would like to say a few words to friends who try to make these balcony edges or things like french balconies with the slab edge: What is the need to force to make the same shape? Especially if you are laying ribbed, it means that everywhere is flat. After you create the analysis model, you can also make the odd shapes in the Mold Plan drawings. You don't need to hold the ends of the beams, the edges or the places where they are not. Weird and error-prone knots occur in order to capture the balcony shape exactly. Again, you are making ribbed flooring in the same way, you have the chance to pass beams wherever you want, you should use this chance and this right in a positive way and well. You can analyze the roof beam and floor loads by reviewing them again. I haven't played with your other parameters. I do not know how useful it will be, but I am sending the project in the attachment. (Reanalyze the project)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top