Relative Floor Offset

Re: RELATIVE FLOOR DELAY
"serkankaradag44":2n4cxf6g" said:
GOOD DAY IN MY ATTACHED PROJECT, THE ANALYSIS RESULT GIVEN RELATIVE FLOOR DELAY FAULT. .) Your project does not meet the TDY 2007 regulation conditions . Your project was designed in the 1st earthquake zone and as a beamless slab. However, in the TDY 2.5.1.4 article, "beamless slab reinforced concrete systems without curtains are defined as systems with normal ductility level. will be resolved". Accordingly, if your project will be in the 1st earthquake zone, you should arrange the carrier system as column-panel... In this case, you can solve your project mixed or high by providing alfsas ratios . 2.) Your project was made in version 6. Since your load-bearing system is a beamless slab, it would be more convenient for you to use the program possibilities by accepting a semi-rigid diaphragm in version 7 and solving the slab earthquake effects . You have done the analysis, you will have to create a second system of fictitious beams for irregularity checks. The upgrade from version 6 to version 7 is free:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
3.)Model elevator panels as shells. 4.) As for the answer to your question; It seems normal to encounter such a message as a result of insufficient column dimensions as the space on the mezzanine floor is reduced. When you apply the 1st and 2nd items, you will probably also provide the relative story drift. If you cannot provide it, you have no choice but to increase the column/panel dimensions or number. Good work
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top