reinforcement problem in ground floor column

abaci09

New Member
I wonder why there is too much reinforcement in some of the ground floor columns. I would appreciate it if you could examine and tell me.
 
Mr. abaci09 What I saw when I examined your project 1- Correct the error messages given in the geometry control. a- ensure the continuity of the ribs. b- If you pass BAP10-11 straight in the basement, it will be a single curtain. 2- Solve your building as a semi-rigid diaphragm , the floors and the beams as a whole. 3- Solve it together with the ladder (by defining its supports). 5- The error (B) in the columns must be corrected. (PROJECT ERRORS ARE NOT VISIBLE ON THE SCREEN OUTPUT BUT THEY ARE VISIBLE ON THE ACCOUNT PRINT.) 6- There is a warning that the deflection limit has been exceeded in the beams and it must be corrected. 7- Defect (ab) in columns and beams TDY 3.4.3.1. this should be corrected about the anchor length. 8- Also, even without these corrections, there is no excess in the reinforcements in your columns. If you solve it as a semi-rigid diaphragm, it becomes less. Take it easy Unver ÖZCAN
 
After the building inspection law, the short side of the column should be at least 30. In most of the projects in the forum, I still see it as 25. Especially in the projects in the 1st degree earthquake zones, it still appears to be 25, isn't it wrong?
 
Mr. GETA
"GETA":od04hp5c" said:
After the building inspection law, the short side of the column must be at least 30.
In which law of my building inspection it says that the short column edge should be 30 cm? If so, why do we comply with TDY 2007? 40 cm If there is no problem in terms of static calculation and TDY 2007 is suitable, I think there is no problem.
 
"unver":2f67bigd" said:
Sn GETA
"GETA":2f67bigd" said:
After the building inspection law, the short side of the column should be at least 30.
In which law of my building inspection it says that the short column edge should be 30 cm ? If so, why do we sleep in TDY 2007? If he says 40 cm, will we follow him? If there is no problem as a static calculation and TDY 2007 is appropriate, I think there is no problem. Greetings. Ünver ÖZCAN
there was a break in the building inspection control sheet "Is the column short side less than 30cm?" I don't know if there is such a phrase, but now I think that 25 cm cross-section is not an insufficient cross-section if there is no problem in the static calculation, but in practice, it is a fact that the mold makers can easily slide the columns 2-3 cm according to the sprouts in the application called axis hammer, so I am generally 30 cm at sites that are not under my control. I don't use less slices than
 
In the Mr. siromar Static project control form: "The narrow edge of the columns is at least 30 cm in 12. COMMON DEFICIENCIES." exists in terms of control. Not necessarily. I agree with you that the narrow side of the column should be 30 cm. What I want to emphasize here is that the engineer can use it in 25 cm. In the same way: "12. FREQUENTLY ENCOUNTERED DEFICIENCIES In closed overhangs, the columns are connected with beams to form a frame in both directions." is the line. If you do not meet this requirement, there are cases where your project is not approved because we made a principle decision (even though it is not TDY 2007). Unver ÖZCAN
 
Thanks a lot for the answers. There is no such thing as 30 min column narrow side as I know. The min column cross-section area is 75000 mm2, so if the narrow side is 25, it will be 25x30.
 
Short column size 25 cm can be selected according to TDY. However, if TDY 3.4.3.1b is applied, the 25 cm size may be insufficient... In this sense, 30 cm can be a result. Good work...
 
In my projects, municipalities do not accept columns under 30 cm. Considering the mistakes made by the masters, it seemed more logical that the narrow side should be at least 30 cm.
 
Back
Top