Reinforcement on vertical carriers in cork flooring system

[myıldız25]

Hello, I am attaching the data about the vertical load-bearing elements in our project, which we modeled with the cork flooring system. I would like to thank you in advance for your suggestions or for the situations we missed on the subject. I am adding the model of the same project as a hollow block system. The tipping rates related to the curtains did not seem realistic to me, although there are 3 curtains in the y direction, the ratio in this direction is 11%. What should we do to catch 75% and fill the hollow Let's solve..

 

[myıldız25]

Re: REINFORCEMENT ON VERTICAL CARRIERS IN MUSHROOM FLOORING SYSTEM mushroom flooring

 

[unver]

Hello. My suggestions: -- On the map, the construction site is Istanbul. Fix it and exit the wizard by installing. --one. In the basement, the column heads protruded beyond the floors. If it stays like this, it must be in the flooring. --Nevertheless, corner columns can be a problem. It is more convenient for you to turn the outside of this floor with beams. -- Lift the columns around the stairs and the elevator and turn with the curtain. You open doorways. -- Group the curtains. --You can lift the walls in the attic floor and reduce the floor loads, --All the wall loads are taken in the normal floors, and live loads can be reduced here. -- Model the ladder and solve it together. Unver ÖZCAN

 

[myıldız25]

Hello Unver, thank you very much for the information you have provided. But I have problems with using the program related to cork flooring, more precisely, I do not understand whether I have made the right calculation model, let me put a few questions like this, I would be very happy if you could help me. 1- When I turn around the elevator and stairs or the outer contours with beams on the floor with cork flooring, the working and support types of the floors appear as if they dissolve the beamed slab flooring, which should not be the case with cork. For example, when a single slab is in the shape of a mushroom, there is no beam on the floor, while the support type appears as a non-beamed floor type, but when there are beams on the floor, there are expressions such as a support type simple support that works in both directions. 2-Can we create the mushroom with the floor edges in the mushroom floor modeling, or we should define it as a single floor and open my floor space. 3- If there are beams in the floor, it does not perform the punching calculations on the floor without defining a 0-dimensional header to the columns, so the presence of beams on the floor invalidates the mushroom floor model and causes it to be perceived as a beamed plate. 4-Are we doing a wrong modeling by throwing the tiles that we cannot assign at once due to geometry, with the tile edge? Are there any points that you say are right or wrong about the model for the project I sent in the appendix. Thank you very much for your help in advance.

 

[HakanŞahin]

thank you very much for the information you have given. But I have problems with using the program for cork flooring, more precisely, I do not understand whether I have made the right calculation model, I would like to express a few questions, I would be very happy if you could help me. 1- On the floor with cork flooring, when I turn around the elevator and stairs or the outer contours with beams, the working and support types of the floors seem to dissolve the beamed slab, as it should not be in the cork. For example, when a single slab is in the form of a mushroom, there is no beam on the floor, but the support type appears as a headless floor type without beam. However, when there are beams on the floor, there are expressions such as simple support type that works in both directions, should they be absent in mushroom design? 3-If there are beams on the floor, it does not do the punching calculations on the floor without defining a 0-dimensional header for the columns, so the presence of beams on the floor invalidates the model in the form of cork flooring in the form of a plaque

In case of beams on any edge in non-beam slab systems, it is normal for the slab operation type to not appear for some slabs in the "slab thickness control" report. This is not related to analysis. It would be appropriate to check the thickness and deflection controls within the framework of what is explained in the attached link.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Moment punching control is made according to the axial loading condition on the columns according to the principles given in TS500. There are beams in the middle zone of the floors. For this reason, in order to control the punching, the column heading must be defined by giving zero height and table height values. Column head height and table height value should be created according to the conditions given in TS 500 figures 11.3 and 11.4 if they are to be applied on site. If the purpose is only to control stapling and is a constructive definition, the height and table height values should be given zero. In this case, the column head dimensions do not matter. However, instead, we recommend that you review and apply TBDY 7.11.6 for stapling controls on walls and shear friction calculation, and TBDY 7.11.7 for beamless floor stapling controls.

In 2-mushroom slab modeling, can we create the mushroom with tile edges, or we should define it as a single slab and open my slab gap.

You can create it by dividing it by tile edges or by opening a slab gap.

Are we doing a wrong modeling by throwing the tiles that we could not assign at once due to 4-geometry with the tile edge?

No, you wouldn't be modeling wrong.

Do you have any points about the model for the project I have attached, right or wrong.

The floor space limit defined around the S7 and S8 columns of the ground floor in your project is incorrect. You should define the floor space from the column edges. Also, 13.03. We recommend that you consider the points stated in the response we gave for this project, which you sent to technical support by e-mail in 2019.