If you don't want to reduce the range of additional reinforcements, yes it is correct Note: Checked in Analysis Settings/Basic Ground Tab If not, you can also evaluate the analysis for the raft foundation-superstructure interaction according to the ""enlarge the joint area" situation."kadirbulut2012":7vwo4k0x" said:so if I don't want to use reinforcement other than Q14, I think it's not possible, is it true?
The inadequacy of raft flooring additional reinforcements is left to the discretion of the user.Also, when the error is not given in the first place, is it insignificant or can be ignored when it is given below as multiplied in this way? What is the difference of it being given at the beginning and given in this way.
Hello, the condition regarding the reinforcement spacing is specified in TS500. 9.5.2 - Rebar Spacing The net spacing between the rebars in the same row is the rebar diameter, 4/3 of the maximum aggregate diameter and 25 mm. These limits are also valid where there are overlapping joints."kadirbulut2012":swh9hebe" said:thanks for your answers. Additionally: is there a limit for the range of additional reinforcement, I didn't see it, did I overlook it in the regulations? Q14/7 when you add additional reinforcement, the problem is solved, but the application It didn't seem like a logical spacing for me.
According to the final version, drawings, reports and quantities need to be taken again."kadirbulut2012":3kvlf6oz" said:I have one more question; When a possible element gives a missing reinforcement error, when we increase this reinforcement from the reinforced concrete design, does the report and the plans we will create be updated? For example: I made Q14/15 while the additional reinforcements were basically Q14/20 does it update it in report, quantity and plan expansions?My version is 8.5.
German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish