Reinforced Concrete Column - Honeycomb Beam Combination

O

onrkrtc

New Member
We are planning to make a typical industrial structure. (18 x 78) Columns 50/50 reinforced concrete, roof steel. In my own way, I tried to make a column-beam joint, taking into account the rain gutter. I have doubts as to whether the combination I made makes sense. I am looking for opinions from my experienced friends/masters/teachers on this subject and the whole project. (File 10 Mb)
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Good work.
 
Hello there; In your project, you can first solve the steel roof with the ductility level norm, then make the ductility level high and design only the reinforced concrete without interfering with the steel elements. In this way, you can obtain a more economical structure. Apart from that, I recommend you to watch the video in the link
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
. In the video, topics such as dividing the purlins from all intersections, removing some purlins from the analysis, modeling the purlins at the beginning, ending and middle of the crosses, and defining the tension rods are explained in your model. When all these are realized, you can obtain more economical sections. For the joint only the gusset seems to overlap the reinforced concrete element, you can shorten or remove the gusset. Good work.
 
Hello, Ms. Nurgül, thank you for your advice and warnings. The sections always came out big because I forgot to regulate the coating unit weight. After editing it came to reasonable levels. Another point I want to ask is; - I made a gusset for the crane on the reinforced concrete column. On top of that, I defined a crescent. To check the adequacy of the sections of the column. I also defined the crane beam as a part in the columns. But the analysis took 40 minutes. Is there anything I should do to reduce this time?
 
Hello there; Can you share the model you created with the crane or send it to the technical support mail. There may be slowness due to your modal number set for modal analysis, if you change your method to Ritz from the modal analysis-modal section in the structure tree and set the mode number to 20, it will take a little less time. However, in general, models with a crane have a longer duration. Good work.
 
Hello there; Modeling the crane slows it down a bit, and you have defined a crane from a lower floor, not from the floor where the reinforced concrete column is. When you are on the 1st floor, define the crane by selecting the reinforced concrete columns. When the crane is defined on steel columns, analysis is done faster. It takes 5-10 minutes for all steel structures about the size of your model, but it seems a bit slower due to reinforced concrete. This issue will be investigated and it will be checked whether there is any action that can be taken to speed it up. Good work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top