Reflection of the walls entered with the wall command to the report

[qwerty]

Dear Ide, How can we see/show in the program that the walls we entered with the S1-Wall command are included in the calculation in the carrier system? How can we see/show in the reports submitted to the project control authority that the walls we entered with the S2-Wall command are included in the account in the carrier system? In order to create the walls in the system: I can define linear load for the places where the walls are, or I can give the wall load to the places on the beam in the beam settings, or I can create it with the Wall command. Q3-Which of these 3 methods ensures that the walls are included in the calculations from all angles (calculations of the element affected by the wall load, B1 irregularity calculations, etc.)? Q4-Which one will give more accurate results? Q5-Is there a situation that I need to intervene in the analysis settings or elsewhere when using these 3 methods?

 

[HakanŞahin]

How can we see/show in the program that the walls we entered with the

S1-Wall command are included in the calculation in the carrier system?

S2-Wall command How can we see/show that the walls are included in the calculation in the structural system in the reports submitted to the project control authority?

Walls act on the structure as a load in the analysis model. You can view the load values numerically with the beam report tool or as an image in a 3D visualization.

In order to create the walls in the system: I can define a linear load for the places where the walls are, or I can give the wall load to the places on the beam in the beam settings, or I can create it with the Wall command. Q3-Which of these 3 methods ensures that the walls are included in the calculations from all angles (calculations of the element affected by the wall load, B1 irregularity calculations, etc.)?

Linear load can be defined on plate elements, not beams. You can give the beams a uniformly distributed external load, they are all included as loads in the analysis and you can see the values in the 3D visualization and the report. (evenly distributed external load is shown in user-defined loads binding in visualization) . Evenly distributed external load is not effective in B1 irregularity. It is used in B1 irregularity when you define a wall with the wall load value or with the wall command.

Q4-Which one will give more accurate results?

As long as you know what you're doing, they're all correct.

S5-Is there a situation that I need to intervene in the analysis settings or elsewhere when using these 3 methods?

"Use the Ak value on the lower floor the same as the upper floor" in the Analysis settings when you define a wall with the wall load value on "bottom floor" If you do not select the option, B1 irregularity is ignored. If you do not want to use the wall load at the bottom and the Ak value at the bottom floor the same as the top floor, define the wall with the wall command. In the floor parameters, you have the opportunity to interfere with the effective wall shear area Ak value used in B1 irregularity. See also frequently asked questions Answer to question 35:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[qwerty]

First of all, thank you for your answers. What I want to tell by being able to see it in the program: Its effect on analysis results (Moment, Shear, etc.) The walls defined with the Wall command are shown in the Reports as the wall load on the Beams. But can I see the walls that do not sit on the beam but sit on the flooring (plate/rib/cassette or raft flooring) in the reports? How can I include the balustrade on the last floor (the wall that rests on the last floor) in the analysis system (or calculation)? Note: If I define a linear load on non-slab slabs, I will have to make a semi-rigid calculation as per the Program. For B1 irregularity, if I enter the Wall areas in the Floor parameters / Irregularities section, will it no longer take into account the walls that I previously created with the wall command or the wall load command on the beam? Analysis settings / For Ak calculation, the wall unit weight (t/m3): xxx uses the value I entered according to the wall I created with which method? (Is it at the wall load defined on the beam? Is it at the wall load defined on the beam and slab with the wall command?)

 

[HakanŞahin]

The walls defined with the

Wall command are shown in the Reports as the wall load on the Beams. But can I also see the walls that do not sit on the beam but sit on the floor (plate/rib/cassette or raft flooring) in the reports?

you can't see the load values of the walls resting on the slab/rib/cassette or raft flooring) in the reports. You can see it from the 3D visualization.

How can I include the balustrade on the last floor (the wall that rests on the last floor) in the analysis system (or account)?

As I wrote in my previous message, walls act as a load in the analysis model, you can define them to beams or floors.

For B1 irregularity, if I enter the wall areas in the Floor parameters / Irregularities section, it no longer takes into account the walls that I previously created with the wall command or the wall load command on the beam. Is it?

Does not. Ak values entered in floor parameters are taken into account.

Analysis setting Wall unit weight (t/m3) for the lari / Ak account: xxx uses the value I entered according to the wall I created with which method? (Is it at the wall load defined on the beam? Is it at the wall load defined on the beam and slab with the wall command?)

For the Ak calculation, the wall unit weight is used only if the wall load value is entered in the beam settings.

 

[qwerty]

Thank you

 

[isbandam]

The walls defined by the

Wall command are shown in the Reports as the wall load on the Beams. But can I see the walls that do not sit on the beam but sit on the floor (plate/rib/cassette or raft flooring) in the reports?

You cannot see the load values of the walls that do not sit on the beam but sit on the floor (plate/rib/cassette or raft flooring) in the reports. You can see it from the 3D visualization.

How can I include the balustrade on the last floor (the wall that rests on the last floor) in the analysis system (or into the calculation)?

As I wrote in my previous message, the walls act on the structure as a load in the analysis model, you can define the beam or the floor.

For B1 irregularity, if I enter the Wall areas in the Floor parameters / Irregularities section, will it no longer take into account the walls I previously created with the wall command or the wall load command on the beam?

It does not. Ak values entered in the floor parameters are taken into account.

Analysis settings / Wall unit weight for Ak account (t/m3): How does xxx use the value I entered according to the wall I created? (Is it at the wall load defined on the beam? Is it at the wall load defined on the beam and slab with the wall command?)

The wall unit weight for Ak calculation is used only if the wall load value is entered in the beam settings.

How is the value entered in the relevant line by the program? is being used. In other words, how the load defined on the beam with the entered value is converted to the area.

 

[Levent Özpak]

How is the value entered in the relevant line used by the program, that is, how is the load defined on the beam with the entered value converted into area.

If the wall load is entered as a value in the beam settings, the wall shear area used in B1 Irregularity (Ak) is calculated from the average wall height using the following method; AverageWallHeight = FloorHeight*(0.821428571) WallThickness=WallLoad/(WallUnitWeight*AverageWallHeight) X direction; Ak=WallThickness*BeamLength*Cos(BeamLength*WallHeight) Y direction; *Sin(beam angle) Note: If a wall is entered with the wall command in the project, the above method is not used.The effective cutting area of the wall(Ak) is found from the real areas of the walls.

 

[isbandam]

Thank you for the detailed information.