redundant reinforcement on a continuous basis

dear forum officials, I want to make a rafter raft in my project that I have sent in the attachment, but there is a little more iron than necessary in the foundation beams, which I laid in the horizontal direction and placed the raft slabs, which are all the same size. I would like to get your opinions on the reason for this excess iron amount. Are the results natural? Thank you in advance for your answers. Also, the system saves more easily with the smaller sized foundation for testing purposes only with ampatman, without the raft foundation. I wanted to write this message because of this headlight. Thank you
 
Hello, There is no problem with data entry in the project. Since the ground effects in the beamed raft foundation are transmitted to the raft slab and to the foundation by means of the raft slab, the cross-section effects can be more pronounced in the continuous foundation. If a raft foundation is to be created in the system, I recommend defining a beamless raft foundation and making a superstructure interactive solution. In the regulation, it is requested that rotations and displacements occurring in the foundation on C and D group soils should be taken into account in the superstructure. Good work
 
Back
Top