raft flooring reinforcement

I

izmirli_35_35

New Member
After analyzing and correcting the errors in the report, I click on the REINFORCED CONCRETE-RADIUM BASIC tab and see that it is in red. There is an AS error. When I reduce the range of additional reinforcements, the red color in the additional reinforcements section disappears. But even if I make all of the main reinforcements in the raft floor Q18/5, it does not save. In addition, in the selection of reinforcement, max. Even though I chose Q16, it throws Q18 equipment. Is there something I did wrong? I would really appreciate if you can help.
 
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
There is also an existing building on the west side of the building. That's why you turn all four sides of your building with a continuous foundation without ampacification. I want to define a raft slab in the middle. What is the width of the continuous beam predictable for this project. Thanks...
 
"izmirli_35_35":30z8f7da" said:
After doing the analysis, after removing the errors in the report, I click on the REINFORCED CONCRETE-RADIUM BASIC tab and see that it is in red. There is an AS error. When I reduce the spacing of the additional reinforcements, the red color in the additional reinforcements part disappears. But the prime in the raft flooring part It doesn't save all the reinforcements even if I do Q18/5.
Click to expand...
When the analysis is made in the project you added, the AS(-) warning is due to the lack of additional reinforcement in the account axis 2. In the reinforcement selection dialog, the AS(-) warning problem is solved if 18 diameter is selected for additional reinforcements and analysis
Also, even though I choose max. Q16 for raft flooring in reinforcement selection, Q18 reinforcement is throwing. Is there something I am doing wrong. I would appreciate your help.
Click to expand...
We did not encounter such a situation in your project. When the analysis was made as you sent in the project, Raft slab reinforcement diameters are chosen as 16 and 14.
There is also an existing building on the west side of the building. Turning all four sides of your building with a continuous foundation without any ammunition. I want to define a raft slab in the middle. What is the width of the continuous beam predictable for this project. Thank you...
Click to expand...
Data entry in this way is definitely wrong. In this case, the effects of the raft slab columns are not taken into account. In a beamless raft foundation, slab borders should be formed with slab edges. Good work
 
"izmirli_35_35":1lhehd56" said:
http://dosya.co/14czl093309o/1376_10_2.ide7.html Why can't I define a continuous foundation under the S11 column?
Click to expand...
Since the columns are bar elements, a continuous foundation cannot be drawn under the column. Also, the basic data entry is definitely wrong, please read my previous message.
 
So, to make rafter raft, should we use all the columns and create a grid system and define a raft in the middle? Before putting the ampatmans, 18 reinforcements were coming out, even though it was not selected. FOR ADDITIONAL REINFORCEMENTS, I CHOOSE 18' DIAMETER. BUT THE DIAMETER CHANGES WHEN I ANALYZE AGAIN... I CAN'T REMOVE THE WARNING...
 
"izmirli_35_35":1m58iz7o" said:
So, should we use all the columns to make rafter raft, create a grid system and define a raft in the middle?
Click to expand...
Yes.
18 reinforcement was coming out before placing the amplitudes, although it was not selected. FOR ADDITIONAL REINFORCEMENTS I CHOOSE THE DIAMETER OF 18. BUT THE DIAMETER CHANGES WHEN I ANALYZE AGAIN... I CAN'T REMOVE THE ALARM AGAIN...
Click to expand...
This kind of problem does not occur in the project you added. If your problem persists,
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
install version 8 and call us by phone Let's examine the problem by remote access to your computer Tel: 0 224 220 67 17
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top