Raft floor pleated solution

[statikçim]

hello When you dissolve the raft floor with pleats, all the sections and reinforcements are saved and there is no problem in the analysis. but when you dissolve the raft slab at the top and bottom straight, section and reinforcement error occurs. Even though I increase the section and reinforcements, the error does not go away. I wonder why?

 

[Levent Özpak]

hello When you dissolve the raft slab with pleats, all the sections and reinforcements are saved and there is no problem in analysis. ?

Hi, When the reinforcement type is selected straight+pile, the reinforcement design is made only to the place where the reinforcement axis passes, and the bottom clearance is not checked. Tensile stresses may occur at different points of the raft slab, both at the bottom and at the top. Therefore, the reinforcement type is at the top + bottom It is appropriate to choose flat reinforcement.

 

[meric54]

When the reinforcement type is selected as flat+pile, the reinforcement design is made only where the reinforcement axis passes and no control is made for the lower opening. At 10.20, are these lower clearance checks done?

 

[Levent Özpak]

When the reinforcement type is flat+pile is selected, only the reinforcement design is made to the place where the reinforcement axis passes, and the bottom clearance is not checked. In 10.20, are these lower clearance checks done?

Ver 10.20 also It would be appropriate to select the reinforcement type at the top + flat reinforcement at the bottom.

 

[meric54]

Is there a statement in our regulation that it cannot be done? If we define a frequent axis of calculation at different points of the raft flooring, will the tensile stresses in both the lower and upper regions be suitable for controlled for the lower span? Or is it possible to make a general calculation as in the case of upper flat + lower flat reinforcement? Thanks for your interest, keep up the good work.