Raft basic static results

Re: 0 STRESS Hello Muhsin, You wrote the project as built in 8.103, but your project seems to have been made in version 8.5. We suggested that you produce your projects in version 8.103. Please continue your projects in version 8.103. Regarding the problem, we see that the problem in question does not occur in the new update that will be released soon. If you haven't read the announcement we made about the new version before, you can see it from the link below.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Good work
 
0 STRESS THE PROJECT YOU SAID PROJECT I ADDED THE PROJECT. I SAID IT WAS DONE WITH 8.500. I DELETED THE TOPIC AND IF YOU HOLD THE SAME DIFFICULT I EXPERIENCED IN ANOTHER PROJECT, IF YOU RESIST TO TALK ABOUT THE PROJECT, YOU CANNOT EXPLAIN THE SAME PROJECT WITH YOU OR WITH THE PROJECT. I have nothing to do with any software company. So when I write about the shortcomings of the program, don't worry about it, don't accuse me of slandering. Look, I used STA4CAD for years before that, but then I chose IDECAD. Because I see that it follows a company policy that is open to development, but why is an idecad 8 steel and reinforced concrete user, that is, a person who uses both steel and reinforced concrete with the same lock, not have any problems, we reinforced concrete users do. We can't benefit from any of these updates in a healthy way? I mean, what is ours in the money that the men gave? You neglected reinforced concrete, you can denigrate me as much as you want, it doesn't matter to me. I would also like to add that we said don't use 8.500, what does it mean, you are doing the update and you are saying not to use it here, and you are contradicting yourself here. Also, I have stated many times that the project I threw there was updated when it first came out, then we did not make a project with 8.500, but instead of helping you, you insist that we say not to use it? ? Also, the first screenshot he sent was made with 8.103, I took care of it, why should I send you the project I handled again. Am I so happy to write something here, headlong. I'm not doing a project for the first time so that I can get an error if there are hundreds of errors in the model I started. Look, Mr. Ismail, I got the error that idecad stopped working 20 times until noon on the project I started in the morning. Are you idecad family right?
 
Re: 0 STRESS
"muhsin34":snilmnq2" said:
PROJECT YOU SAYED PROJECT I ADDED THE PROJECT. I SAID IT WAS MADE WITH 8.500. I CLEARED THE SUBJECT AND WAS THE SAME I WAS LIVED IN A PROJECT. OR, IF YOU DIDN'T AND LOCK THE SUBJECT WITHOUT DELETING.....
We say, don't do projects with 8.500, do it with 8.103. You say you did it with 8.103. Then you send 8.500 project. Don't do project with 8.500 because it may give erroneous results. this means that we detected an error of only 8.500 in creating a semi-rigid diaphragm, this error prevents you from making a proper project in the semi-rigid diaphragm option, so it means don't use it.[/b] Since you are not used to such a transparent behavior before, I guess you are taking what I said as an insult to you. If you haven't read our previous announcement regarding the new version, you can see it from the link below:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: 0 STRESS
"muhsin34":2qu6egqw" said:
an idecad 8 steel and reinforced concrete user, that is, the person who uses both steel and reinforced concrete with the same lock, why does not we have any problems with any of these updates, we reinforced concrete users We can't use it in a healthy way?
Hello Muhsin, Reinforced concrete and steel programs are the same programs. The difference is that those who have steel locks see the commands related to steel and reinforced concrete, reinforced concrete users only see the reinforced concrete commands. Reinforced concrete facilities are the same for both users. In short, the reinforced concrete user and the steel user have the same same concrete possibilities as reinforced concrete. Error situations occur on a project basis, depending on the projects. Therefore, there is no result as you have written. Good work
 
How many times do I have to explain the same thing to you? Look bro, the first screenshot I sent was made with 8.103. I say they are two different projects. You don't want me to understand. I solved the problem in 8.103 myself. The stress error I sent yesterday was the project I did when the update was first released, so is it that hard to understand? The project was made before you said you don't use it. HOWEVER, I CANNOT BE TRANSPARENT TO YOU, İSMAİL MR. !! AS A RESULT, IDECAD7 WILL BE HEALTHIER FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE. I HAVE NO MORE NEED TO DISCUSS WITH YOU. I CAN ENDORSE THAT MUCH OF A FOUR-ARMED ATTACK. IF IT IS SO COMFORTABLE TO WRITE ABOUT THE OLD AND DEFICIENCIES, CLOSE THE FORUM. YOU THREATENED ME YESTERDAY, IN CASE I FROST YOUR MEMBERSHIP. DO YOU THINK I CARE ABOUT THAT?
 
I made the following announcement on 21/06/2016. Version 8.502 will be released soon. With the release of this version, it was felt necessary to present the following issues for your information. 1) Version 8.502 can be used for scaffolding projects together with the Reinforced Concrete program. 2) You can continue to use 8.103 and 7.xx versions for your reinforced concrete projects safely and without any errors. 3) The 8.502 version that will be released will be much more stable than the 8.500, but there may still be some problems, especially in creating a semi-rigid diaphragm. 4) There is no problem in creating a semi-rigid diaphragm in 7.xx and 8.103 versions 5) Steel program users can safely continue to use 8.103 8.500 and 8.502. 6) Version 8.6 will continue to be developed until the end of 2016 and will be released before 2017. 7) The update regarding the earthquake regulation will be released with the 9.xx version before the regulation enters into force. Semi-rigid diaphragm creation and modeling of curtains as shells already exist and are provided in version 7.xx and version 8.103. It will naturally provide version 8.6 as well. Note: All problems with Semi-Rigid diaphragm option have been fixed and version 8.61 has been released. You can download it from the following link:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Hello again Muhsin, S12 column on the 1st basement floor seems to have shifted to the left from the 49-F intersection. This definition creates some angle difference between the elements. For the solution, move the S12 column to the 49-F axis intersection with the move node command. When you get a report after the analysis, you will be able to see the raft static results and the ground stress values. In the 8.5 version of the project you added, the problem has been fixed.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Back
Top