German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish When I analyze with the phased construction calculation, I encounter unexpected errors in the tiles. So much so that in each analysis, there is a lack of reinforcement in different floors. Especially on console floors. I would appreciate it if anyone with knowledge on the subject could share their comments. The building model has 6 floors. I am using idecad 7.022. Respects.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Progressive Construction Calculation
- Thread starter ganymede
- Start date
HakanŞahin
Administrator
Hello, If you add the project, we will review it."ganymede":3k0ricqz" said:When I analyze with phased construction calculations, I encounter unexpected errors in floors. So much so that in each analysis, there is a lack of reinforcement in different floors. Especially in console floors. I would appreciate if anyone who has knowledge about the subject can share their comments. Building model 6 I am using idecad 7.022. Regards.
You can download the project from the link Mr. Hakan. It's something I come across all the time. It is mostly seen in consoles and hollow floors. I have sent an e-mail before, but I have not received a response. Considering that it gives more realistic results, I want to calculate accordingly, regardless of the number of floors.
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
Thank you for your reply, Mr. Ünver. I don't get an unsupported beam warning. My problem is not exactly more or less errors. After deleting the faulty slab and reanalyzing, this time there are problems with other slabs. It is an ongoing problem."unver":13idubqj" said:Hello - The beams on the 3rd floor are unsupported, --If you make a copy from the ground floor and solve it, there will be 3 errors (2 curtains and 1 eaves) Ünver ÖZCAN
HakanŞahin
Administrator
Hello again, There are no unsupported beams on the 3rd floor in your project. We are reviewing your project.
Hello, without changing anything; Unsupported beams give errors in geometry control. The image is attached. I've had geometry checks done a few times without calculation, the same unsupported beams repeat their mistakes. After making calculations, it does not give any unsupported error on the beams. Your information. Unver ÖZCAN
Hello Mr. Unver. I checked it after you said it. As you said, it happened to me too. I've never had this warning on this model. Apart from that, I added a few fringe tiles to the last floor in the attachment I sent you and recorded them without analysis. Therefore, more errors can be seen in the pre-analysis report. But I think that this cannot be the source of my problem, since it does not give these errors after the analysis and there is no general problem with the beams. Are the errors found as a result of this analysis the same as the previous analysis result?
HakanŞahin
Administrator
"unver":39fpdtls" said:Hello Without changing anything; Unsupported beams give errors in geometry control. Its image is attached. I have geometry checked several times without making calculations, the same unsupported beams repeat their errors. After calculation, beams do not show unsupported errors after calculation. ÖZCAN
Hello again. The unsupported beam message you see in the geometry control when you first open the project occurs in 7, and only 32 bit versions, and if you enter the properties of any beam and click OK, the unsupported beam message will disappear. If you use the 7, 64-bit version, you will not see this message. Since version 8 is only 64 bit, there is no such problem in 8 versions. The problem mentioned in this topic has nothing to do with the unsupported beam found message. 2. The problem in your project is related to the non-mesh problem in the eaves slabs and its reinforced concrete. If you delete the eaves and analyze the construction stages again and again, you can observe that the problem you mentioned does not occur."ganymede":39fpdtls" said:Hello, Unver Bey. I checked it after you said it. As you said, it happened to me too. I've never had this warning on this model. Apart from that, I added a few fringe tiles to the last floor in the attachment I sent you and recorded them without analysis. Therefore, more errors can be seen in the pre-analysis report. But I think that this cannot be the source of my problem, since it does not give these errors after the analysis and there is no general problem with the beams. Are the errors found as a result of this analysis the same as the results of the previous analysis?