Post-analysis beam errors

E

ecspa1

New Member
Hello, after the analysis, when I enter the beams from the reinforced concrete icon, there are errors in the form of abbreviations next to my beams, but I could not find their meanings and how to solve the problems (I can see them when I right click on the columns) can you help me?
 
Hello, In Beam: K: It does not provide shear safety of beam. Increase the beam dimensions. M: The maximum market value is exceeded. ro= As / [b.(h-pp)] > romax . Q: The TS500 does not provide sudden and temporal deflection conditions. Increase the beam dimensions. N: Nd<=0.1.Ac. The fck condition is not met. Increase the beam dimensions. Ç: TS500 crack boundary conditions are exceeded. ab: It means that TDY does not meet Article 3.4.3.1. Increasing the short dimension of the column in which the beam is stuck in its own axis may be the solution. Br: TS500 torsion condition is exceeded. As(-) : Insufficient reinforcement condition. In the selection of reinforcement, sufficient size of reinforcement diameter may not be marked. In Column : B: Column-Beam Junction does not provide shear safety. Increasing the beam width or the size of the column in the relevant direction may be the solution. K: Column Mid Zone does not provide Shear Safety. Column sizes are insufficient. E: Column does not provide maximum normal force control. (Ndmax> 0.5Acfck) Column dimensions are insufficient. M: The maximum purchase value has been exceeded. Column sizes are insufficient. ab: Column does not meet TDY Clause 3.4.3.1. Increasing the colon short size may be the solution. As(-) : Insufficient reinforcement condition. In the selection of reinforcement, sufficient size of reinforcement diameter may not be marked. Z: Non-beam slab or beam exceeds stapling strength on raft. Increasing the thickness of the plate or forming a head plate can be a solution. In slab and raft slab: Çd: The slab works on double-reinforced section. We do not allow double reinforcement on floors. Increase the slab thickness. Min: Floor TS500 does not provide minimum thickness control. Increase the slab thickness. Q : The flooring does not meet the deflection conditions of the TS500. Increase the slab thickness. Ace(-) : Insufficient reinforcement. In the selection of reinforcement, sufficient size of reinforcement diameter may not be marked. Zg : Ground safety value is exceeded in raft flooring. Zg > Zgemn. On a permanent basis: K: Does not provide slip safety. Increase foundation dimensions. Zg : Ground confidence value is exceeded. Zg>Zgem. Ace(-) : Insufficient reinforcement. In the selection of reinforcement, sufficient size of reinforcement diameter may not be marked. For rib-cassette threads: M: Maximum marginal value exceeded. Increase thread dimensions. Q: The TS500 does not provide sudden and temporal deflection conditions. Increase the tooth dimensions. Min: The TS500 does not meet the minimum size requirements. Ace(-) : Insufficient reinforcement. In the selection of reinforcement, sufficient size of reinforcement diameter may not be marked.
 
"tavekkul":i0hurkrr" said:
what is the reason why I get As- error in continuous foundations?
Click to expand...
Hello Mr. Ahmet In this type of beams consisting of long or repetitive spans exceeding 12 meters, the program is designed to correct the missing reinforcement in assembly and/or additional numbers. This is one of the things we know. We have to intervene in reinforcement transitions in some openings to eliminate the missing As in your project. For example, in the settings of the ST9 continuous foundation, in the static tab, disable the combine option for assembly, pillar, flat and body. Similarly, we can change the 12 meter span conditions. Manually edit for other beams that give missing Aces. For example, we can do it as blocks such as ST126, ST134, ST137, ST147, etc. I made the edit that fixed the missing Ace problem for you in the attached project. Check it out, you can use it if you want...
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Good work...
 
good day guys. In the attached beam detail, in column-beam junctions, shouldn't the bottom reinforcements be extended to the side in continuous beams? KZ16-KZ21 continuous beam, for example, when we look at the bottom in detail, the reinforcement is cut in the middle of the column.
 
"batuhann28522":3t9bfa5r" said:
good day guys. In the attached beam detail, in the column-beam junctions, shouldn't the reinforcements at the bottom be extended to the side in continuous beams? KZ16-KZ21 continuous beam, for example, cut the reinforcement in the middle of the column when we look at the bottom in detail, KZ14-KZ31 is the same The problem is sometime in the middle, how can I fix it
Click to expand...
Hello, as stated in TDY 2007 item 3.4.3 Figure 3.7, the beam sub-reinforcements are extended from the inside of the support according to the negative value of the lb and 50fi condition (These reinforcements are the existing reinforcement area in the adjacent beam support. Also, in version 8, "Extend bottom reinforcements to adjacent span" option has been added in Beam parameters depending on the beam span.
 
"Levent Özpak":1bwrxu6l" said:
Hello, As stated in TDY 2007 item 3.4.3 Figure 3.7, the beam sub-reinforcements are extended from the inside of the support according to the negative value of the lb and 50fi condition (These reinforcements are defined as the existing reinforcement area in the adjacent beam support. not taken into account) Also in version 8, "Extend bottom reinforcements to adjacent opening" option has been added in Beam parameters depending on beam span.
Click to expand...
I use idestatic7, I think that parameter is not available or I couldn't find it. I have to extend the reinforcements, how can I do it in idestatic7. I use all beams one by one in Autocad It would take a lot of time if I tried to fix it on it.
 
"batuhann28522":2wxgqx2s" said:
"Levent Özpak":2wxgqx2s" said:
Hello, as stated in TDY 2007 item 3.4.3 Figure 3.7, the beam sub-rebars are extended from the inside of the support according to the negative value of lb and 50fi condition. (These reinforcements are not considered as the existing reinforcement area in the adjacent beam support) Also, in version 8, the "Extend lower reinforcements to adjacent opening" option has been added to the beam parameters, depending on the beam span.
Click to expand...
I am using idestatic7, I think that parameter does not exist or I could not find it. I have to extend the equipment, how can I do it in idestatic7. If I try to fix all the beams one by one through Autocad, it would take a lot of time.
Click to expand...
As I wrote in my previous message, this option is available in version 8. Longitudinal reinforcements are drawn as indicated in TDY 2007 item 3.4.3 in figure 3.7. (Since these reinforcements are not considered as existing in the neighboring beam, there is no need for extension.) If you still want to lengthen, you can edit using the 2D possibilities after taking the beam expansion. Good work
 
"furkizbey":9y7a0t74" said:
Hi, I could not solve the As- error that occurred in a beam in the project. I would appreciate your help. Take it easy
Click to expand...
Arrange the stirrup of the beam as fi8/20/10 on all floors. The As- error will disappear .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top