payment error

PURSANTAGE ERROR OCCURS ON MY K24 AND K35 BEAMERS. THE PROBLEM IS GONE WHEN I ENLARGE MY BEAMS TO 55/30 DIMENSIONS. BUT LOTS OF EQUIPMENT IS COMING. I WAITING FOR YOUR SUGGESTIONS IN ORDER THAT IT DOES NOT GIVE A PURSANTAJ ERROR AND IN ORDER THAT THE EQUIPMENT IS LOW THANK YOU FROM NOW. THE PROJECT IS ATTACHED.
 
Hello My Suggestions --Linear and point slab loads defined on rib and cassette slabs are not taken into account in the fully rigid diaphragm solution in 8 Version either. -- If you make a solution as a semi-rigid diaphragm, it will be taken into account. --I think semi-rigid diaphragm solve it, --The consoles I marked below in semi-rigid diaphragm give an error. (There is a bracing error.) --It is calculated when deleted. --K24-K35 as you said, enlarge (center the columns) your building's most critical beams, -- Fix the support of the stairs and include them in the solution, -- You can reduce the live loads on the roof, -- If there is no architectural necessity on the exterior beams, hang or expand. Good luck with. Unver ÖZCAN
 
"unver":15miol7v" said:
Hi My Suggestions --Linear and point slab loads defined on rib and cassette slabs are not taken into account in the full rigid diaphragm solution in 8 Version either. --If you make a solution as semi-rigid diaphragm, it will be taken into account. Solve rigid diaphragm, --The consoles I have marked below in semi-rigid diaphragm give an error. (There is a bracing error.) --It is calculated when deleted. --K24-K35 enlarge as you said (center the columns) the most critical beams of your building, --Resolve the support situation of the stairs by correcting include, --You can reduce the live loads on the roof, --If there is no architectural necessity on the exterior beams, hang it or expand it. Take it easy. Ünver ÖZCAN
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR SUGGESTIONS. REINFORCEMENT QUANTITY APPROXIMATELY 40 TONS. CONSTRUCTION AREA IS 760 M2. IS IT TOO MUCH FOR LOCATION?
 
"ramazangorkemusta":3pl0gqms" said:
"unver":3pl0gqms" said:
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR SUGGESTIONS, ÜNVER BEY. THE AMOUNT OF REINFORCEMENT IS APPROXIMATELY 40 TON. IS IT NOT MORE FOR A PLACE WITH A CONSTRUCTION AREA OF 760 M2?
Hello, You did not include the foundation in your project. It is around 1030 m2 when included. In addition, it is seen that columns, curtains and ribbed floors generally work at a minimum. Good work
 
"ramazangorkemusta":1t4k6pgp" said:
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR SUGGESTIONS ÜNVER BEY. REINFORCEMENT AMOUNT IS APPROXIMATELY 40 TON. IS IT NOT TOO MUCH FOR A PLACE WITH A CONSTRUCTION AREA OF 760 M2? Also, the calculation of m²/kg is a very general thing. You can appreciate that it varies depending on the type of structure and the static design. Also, the foundations are calculated as if they were a layer (your foundation is 185 m²). From this point of view, your project is around 1030 m² with the foundations To put it roughly, you have 150 m² of curtains in the basement in your project (it's like 1180 m² in total) Even this corresponds to almost one floor. And the system ribbed flooring system means that the amount of reinforcement on a square meter basis (even if the sections are forced to a minimum) .
 
Hello, I agree with the writings of Levent and Nedim. In order to say that the equipment is excessive, at least three of the programs used in the market must be compared by entering the data under the same conditions. However, when such a comparison is made, one thing can be said clearly. In my previous program comparisons, I did not see exaggerated differences. The results are close. As a user of twenty-two years, I say that you can safely use the program. Unver ÖZCAN
 
Back
Top