Our eyes are on the road!! where are you 6.01

C

civil1979

New Member
Greetings everyone. There is quite a bit of stagnation in the forum these days. I think it's because of the heat. Are there any new developments regarding 6.01? I heard that it will be out at the end of August. Dear ide admins and technical support, I think it is up to you to revive the form in this stagnation period. I think the forum will come to life a little if you report the developments about 6.01 to the forum more often. Best regards
 
We share the developments in the 6.0100 version with you in the related announcement. The program will not be released at the end of August, you heard wrong :) We were planning it as late summer-early autumn, but we thought it appropriate to add a few new features to this version. (Well foundation calculation, continuous foundations interactive solution and one more new feature to be announced in the coming days). Therefore, the new version will be "released"
 
Dear admin, You used a very round sentence that it will be released when it's finished. We look forward to it as soon as possible::::))))). Could you give an exact date for version 6.10? We always say ide build is the fastest ide build, but I guess ide build should be faster in updates :))) good work
 
Dear msa78, it would not be right to give an exact date, but it is going according to plans. As I wrote in the update announcement, we also included terrain modeling and excavation calculation in the 6.0100 version, although it was not planned beforehand, this extended the release date a bit. You should see version 6.0100 not as an ordinary "update", but as a new "version" in itself. As of now, version development has been completed to a large extent and testing has begun. We will get your opinions on the version with a "public beta" version soon, and we will give the final shape to the drawings.
 
I would like to thank the Ide family for their sensitivity to the messages. I can't wait for the new version to come out.
 
I WANT TO LEARN reminded the RIGHT THIS VERSION in SO OUTPUT WILL DE you 6:01 DE MUST AND SHOULD FORWARD Kirsten of you to take care of their DRAWINGS gerekiyor.Bize of NO with PROGRAMMER SEEN YOU WANT TO FALLS renovation BEAM OBJECTS the BAD TO COPY you INTRODUCES 3-DIMENSIONAL SYSTEMS Kaldi that You make ACCOUNT THIS WAY BUT OPENING You ÇİZDİRİYORSUN LIKE STRAIGHT ELEMENT OF THIS WORK ALL PROGRAMMERS DONE been SUCH FORWARD KRIS oF IRON BOY VS ALL have DONE bY OPEN FORWARD STAFF BUT INTERNATIONAL STATIC ACCOUNT PROGRAM CALLED İDEYAP we NAMING THIS BUSINESS STILL ÇÖZEMEMİŞ.TEKR is AGAIN HATIRLATIYOR I aND ID CONSTRUCTION THIS SITUATION in OTHER FRIENDS PARTICIPATING iN tHE FORUM REMINDER the Voluntarily in VERSION WHAT I CALL THIS wILL COME FORWARD BEAM + OTHER THE DRAWINGS MUST BE DONE LIKE LADDER HELISEL ETC. THINK WITH HEALTH
 
Dear btemel52, it's easy to always look at the glass half empty and want everything to be on schedule. We would like you to see some of the parts that ideYAPI has handled. Here is the list of jobs from v5 to v6. There are new features added (as a bonus) since version 6 went on sale. The 6.0100 version could easily be named ideSTATIC 7 with these features. On the other hand, there is still a list of tasks that we are asked to do. (read what you want to happen in ideSTATİK). As for sharing the new features we're working on during the software development phase: if we're only going to get negative reactions like this (we're on the road, you said it will come out, where are you, etc.), Just like you said, "like other programmers", we will not share it with you when we do our work from now on. We will seriously consider it. Note: In forum culture, capitalizing means shouting at the other person.
 
Hi.. The transition from version 5 to version 6 has been brought to this point with 3-4 years of intensive work. Thanks to them, İdeYAPI officials declared that they took these suggestions and requests into consideration and shared with us that they entered the necessary work within a certain plan and program under the ANNOUNCEMENTS section of this forum. Giving priority to the "Drawing of oblique beams" requests, which btemel52 also mentioned and which I consider important and quoted, will relieve us users. I hope that the studies on the drawings of the girders will be published in the 6.0100 version. you grow...
 
Dear IdeYAPI officials, dear R&D employees; We appreciate your work, we, the old users, can understand the value of your effort, that's why we have been with you for years... From time to time, we may have requests that will bore you, from time to time. You may be requested to be a little faster, all these requests are reasonable requests... Sharing new developments with us users will provide you with a separate work determination and effort... The glass is already full, we have to look at the empty half.. Also, some possibilities of competing programs are not always available. Although it is superior to IdeYAPI in its current form, it is incomparable with ideYAPI comfort.
 
Dear IdeYAPI officials; You undoubtedly examine the features of the software offered by your competitors more than we do. You know the features of these programs in the market because of what features they are preferred. The reasons for preference are adopted by some institutions and organizations, whether we like it or not, and we even produce projects in those standards. being requested...
 
Dear officials; Whether you call it version 6.0100 or call it ideSTATİK 7, offer it as a bonus or offer it with money, but make sure to present these requests to the market soon... I wish you success and ease in your work..
 
Of course, we know that this type of work is very difficult work. We want the program to be ahead in every field with its ease of use and many features. Our reaction to the ide construction family is not negative. The main reason for the reactions of me and other friends is that we want the best program to give the best calculation and the best drawing detail. For example, if a program can draw a pool x, why is this feature not available in the idea? If the program x has 4 features, the idea must have at least 4 or 5 features. If the ide has 3 features instead of 4, this throws back the comfort and speed of use of the ide. If you do not do what is asked of you, the fact that the program is very fast does not mean that it is very easy to enter data. More important than speed is the safe calculation of any desired structure, accurate drawings. Today, we all know how hard the friends who make projects for the market have in terms of the details they present. Instead of making calculations and drawing details by hand, we expect everything from the programs. We are extremely pleased with the 6 version, although it has its shortcomings. Version 6 has come a long way. As a user who has been using ide structure since 98-99 and following every version released, my request from ide is that I want it to be the best program in the market. It should respond to all our calculation and detail drawing needs. We have full confidence in ideYapı as we know that it will provide continuity due to its corporate identity. but we also compare ide with other programs in terms of the quality and reliability of the work we do. If the program we use is ahead of other programs, it means that we will use the idea with peace of mind without any question marks in our minds. We will add the features to the program after the ide structure, hope to share with us :)))))))))))))))))))))) Best Regards
 
FEAR OF NEW VERSION-VERSIONPHOBIA Whenever a new version is released, I always get scared when it comes out. Because in the new version, we encounter new problems in the previous version. Those of us who couldn't find/see a problem in the old version -we wouldn't quit our project if we saw such a problem anyway - and we are having problems with retrospective reports as the software catches a point that was overlooked in a later version. Either we can't get a report or we come across a completely different drawing. I just wanted to share. That's the nature of the business though. I was wondering if maybe anyone else shares these feelings.
 
ideYAPI has done a very important job in this version, and it has improved the ability to save projects in a way that old versions can read. In other words, when the new version is released, the blockage in the project is a thing of the past.
 
I will not go without saying that some of the comments made on R&D studies in the ideCAD form, which I think are very useful, are over exaggerated. The fact that IdeCAD is an international program is certainly not open to discussion . I would like to draw attention to how many master's theses and pilot studies have been completed with ideCAD. Since IdeCAD 6 came out, for some reason, I couldn't see a comment about one or two studies about time definition calculation in the comments written on the one-type form, after that, my friends working in the foreign market are only interested in my drawings and many reinforced concrete features developed by R&D. I couldn't help asking the question [/color] that the analysis functions are not fully used by the users . Considering that the safety of the structure is more important than obtaining inclined beam reinforcement, I think it will be much more important to add functions such as push-over analysis, moment curvature relationship in new updates. With the opportunity to start the new semester, we would like to thank ideCAD company, which has been providing all kinds of support with social sensitivity to the civil engineering of our university for more than three years for our students to learn ideCAD.
 
Hello there; Like Mr. Hakan, I think that criticism is a bit aggressive, and it is also a matter that should be considered if the criticisms are generally related to the drawing ability of the software. 6 versions of ide should be evaluated in a separate track because there is not much talk about this version in discussion topics, but the biggest criticism point of this type of software is that it has been saved from the Cow-Sausage relationship, which is the reason why they are not very popular in the world. Now the software allows us to create our own loading combinations, to make different analyzes (linear static-nonlinear dynamic..), to define different rigid diaphragms, to solve bar and shell elements interactively, to define different materials, to compare the analysis results with Sap2000 transparently..... etc. It has started to offer many overdue features such as Considering these features, delays in drawing features should be considered normal. I agree with Mr. Hakan about giving priority to the pushover analysis part. Pushover analysis should not only be considered for retrofitting projects of existing buildings, it is also a very good tool for us to learn about the capacity and behavior of the project we have prepared. This form of analysis will play a more important role in the new regulations (according to my feelings). I think that in the next roadmaps, analysis should be planned first. Good work
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top