Openings I'm thinking of making large hollow blocks

Gokhan30

New Member
My dear elders, I need to design a reinforced concrete system. The issue I want to consult with you is that before starting a reinforced concrete system design, what are the points you pay attention to when determining the column placements and dimensions. Also, when deciding on the carrier system, what are you determining your system by taking into account. Note: When I place the columns to fit the architectural project, proper frame systems do not form. The building is also around 140 m2. As the openings are large, it makes me think that I should make a hollow block floor. Am I in the right logic. Could you please look at the project whose architecture I imported and comment. place my columns, solve my project, I have no expectation. Please don't get me wrong. As experienced engineers, if this kind of architectural project came before you, what would be the first thing in your mind. What kind of path would you follow first. I want to learn it. Thank you for your attention in advance
 
Re: determining the carrier system I need to specify one more small footnote. Since the architect works at 1/1 scale, I made scale :2 on autocad and imported it to idecad that way. Column placement is correct, but the wall thickness is doubled. I need your advice on this matter. If I don't double the scale, my columns stay big when I import. 'When I enlarge the scale by 2 times and place my columns, the walls of the architectural project are doubled.
 
Hello Mr. Gökhan... First of all, you don't need to enlarge the project, you work at a normal scale, so it may be a problem to arrange the elements. Your architectural plan was made with the beamed plate in mind, so the system is very smooth, moreover, the openings are not too much; It may have seemed that way to you because you enlarged the project. Element sizes are a nightmare for engineers at first, they settle over time. The dimensions vary according to the loads coming from the openings. Since there is no elevator shaft in the building, if we consider it as 2 floors, it seems that it is enough to put 30/50, 30/60 columns. According to the region and the curtain ratio, the purchases may be higher at 30/50. Some walls have been staggered, and the columns there may extend or turn into curtains. There will probably be curtains on the stairs, there may be a square column on the balcony or round, in the form of 40/40, 35/35. Beams can be 25/50,30/50, Your Floors can be 15 cm. My most important advice here is to force the beamed plate, otherwise I don't know the area, but you may have to struggle with the curtains. Good work...
 
First of all, I would like to thank you very much for your valuable comment. This project will be implemented in Sinop/Saraydüzü region. It is a village house project. The project consists of basement + 2 floors. It is a project that will be submitted to the special provincial administration of Sinop and approved. Since it will be built in the village, the financial conditions are not sufficient for the citizens. Therefore, which system would you choose, considering these conditions?
 
"Gokhan30":r0d3dsly" said:
First of all, thank you very much for your valuable comment. This project will be implemented in Sinop/Saraydüzü region. It is a village house project. The project consists of basement + 2 floors. It is a project that will be submitted to the special provincial administration of Sinop and approved. Financial conditions are not very sufficient for the citizens. Therefore, which system would you choose by looking at these conditions
You are welcome, Mr. Gökhan... In small buildings, there may not be much difference, but beamed plate is always more economical. Your building weight will be less by trying to compare Good work...
 
Hello again. I realized my design taking into account your recommendations. There was no problem. There was no problem in the analysis I made. However, I am uploading the project here. Maybe you have other suggestions for me. It looks like you did this extra or you can remove it. This is my static sense. It helps me to improve. If you review the project and give feedback, I will be very happy. I wish you a good work.
 
Hello Mr. Gökhan, good luck to you again... Column reinforcements in your project must be 12, at least 14 must be left. Column S49 was 25. In the old regulation, the short sides could be made a minimum of 25 cm and L-shaped 20, but I have not seen such a phrase in the new regulation. You need to make a minimum of 30 or you can make a 25/150 L curtain on one side. I do not know if they will close the balcony, but I recommend using a square column. There is a 30/30 column, you can enlarge it like 30/50 or 30/60. You can make the L column straight. L column is not wanted by people who will do the job :). You probably haven't made the basement curtains yet. Sometimes it can be a problem for the beam coming out of the curtain to get stuck in another beam, but I think it would not be a problem here. If the distances are not very close, you could put a column there as a precaution or a curtain could be made, but the building is too small, too many curtains. If the owner objects, you can change the P6 pitch to 25/150 pitch. Likewise, the s46 column can have a curtain. Besides, there would be 5 cm less teeth on the ladder. In general, your carrier system is good. I'll try to write anything else. It would be nice if other people have any advice they can give. Good work...
 
The final design is fine and sufficient. In the previous design, mashallah, there was a lot of workmanship. In the same project, 3-5 different sized elements, 1 column, square column curtain, etc. these mean extra expenses in a limited budget. I think the first thing you need to learn in terms of design culture is to use equal sized elements and make the system as symmetrical as possible.
 
Back
Top