New version requests

mustafaureyen

New Member
EASY TO EVERYONE. CAN WE DETAILED THE TABLE WHICH IS THE ARTICLE 4.3.4.6 OF TIPING MOMENT AND INQUIRY AS IN THE PICTURES? THE REQUEST WAS MADE BY ANTALYA/ MANAVGAT MUNICIPALITY CONTROL ENGINEER. BURSA BRANCH EMRAH BEYLE PHONE ON THE MUNICIPAL ENGINEER AND MADE AN OPINION ON THIS TOPIC. MUSTAFA UREYEN 0553 515 58 54
 
Re: NEW VERSION REQUESTS Why? So we wondered if the control engineer in the municipality had a technical explanation on this issue. The issue is comparing the sum of Mdev moments with Mo, what to check when seeing one by one. If you have any information, could you share it with us? Sent via iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Re: NEW VERSION REQUESTS Actually, we expected the control engineer in the municipality to question the following: While calculating the Mdev moments in the table you put as an example, the bending moments of the shear walls are also added to the beam moments connected to the shear. It is stated in which article of the regulation that this can be done by adding beam moments. Sent via iPhone using Tapatalk
 
We do not make the change you mentioned, and it does not need to be made. The curtains are given separately, just above, under the control of the overturning moment. The values you want to see are given on the same page, three five cm above. An absurd request. In the other program report you gave, it is understood that an calculation was made for the shear walls in a way that the earthquake regulation says do not do this, it will not be accepted. Earthquake regulations prohibit the entry of columns in the headers of the curtains. In the earthquake regulation examples book, it does not show the curtains separately, but gives them as given by ideCAD.
 
İsmail Bey, Article 4.5.3.4 does not prohibit defining columns at the beginning of curtains. It forbids the "sliding frame" model, in which the heads are modeled as columns and the body as a very rigid beam.
 
"miralay":2dijibnm" said:
Ismail Bey, Article 4.5.3.4 does not prohibit defining columns at the heads of curtains. It prohibits the "sliding frame" model, where the heads are modeled as columns and the body as a very rigid beam.
What I mean is; To enter curtains There is no need to define two back bars. Even if you are going to make the curtain heads wider (thick) than the curtain thickness, you cannot enter these regions as rods (Columns). Especially it is not a suitable method to enter columns with the same thickness as the curtain. This is also valid for our program. modeling is valid only when entering the reinforcement curtain.
 
Back
Top