My Project Fails During Analysis and Closes!Help!

ghost_13

New Member
I couldn't solve the system in my project, when the program comes to the ResponseX and Y account while the program is under analysis, it suddenly says 'idecad has stopped working' and closes. How can I get rid of this situation and complete the analysis? I couldn't ensure beam connection shearing in two columns at once. When you look at the 'bj' project, you can't change it because of the architecture, I played with the column directions, but it didn't work. I can't change 'fck' for 2 beams.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
... /QEqsM.rar to the project You can access it from this link. With Health and Well-being.!
 
The link you gave is problematic... Can you check? Is this your project in the message you wrote in the reinforced concrete section?
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
If that project, no shutdown occurs during analysis.
 
yes it is the project...why the program closes during the analysis on my computer..i couldn't understand..if there is any error,can you let me know..do you have a solution suggestion for 2 unit break safety problems?
 
"ghost_13":1b208az5" said:
yes it is the project...why the program closes during analysis on my computer..I don't understand..if there is any error,can you let me know..Do you have a solution for 2 join break security issues
It can be done on a computer with Windows 7 64 bit 8 Gb memory. Since tiles and stairs are included in the analysis model, the memory on the computer you use may be insufficient. You can try to analyze by selecting all tiles and setting the finite element width to 50cm in the Properties / Static tab. Analysis settings --In General settings You can try to analyze using the fully rigid diaphragm model available.
 
Mr. Yasin recommended a document for column beam shear safety. There does not seem to be any other option but to increase the column bj. The 1st factor that causes column beam shear insecurity is that the support reinforcement of the K93 beam is excessive due to the vertical loading. If all your walls are not 20 cm, if you arrange the wall loads as they should be, you can provide relief as the system loads will decrease. Similarly, the live load value was taken as 500 kg/cm2 for all floors. You can check on TS498 whether this value is appropriate according to the purpose of use of the building. The number of mods seems insufficient. Increase the number of mods.
 
If S179 and S180 columns are made of 35/85 and beams on K axis 35/60, column beam shear safety is provided in S179 and S180 columns. The offsets of the beams will be "defined=20 cm", the offsets of the columns will be S179 20/20 cm, S180 15/15 cm. Good work...
 
Yasin, thank you very much, yes, as you said, it was due to memory shortage. When I make the finite element width of the slab 0.5, it saves, now I can make semi-rigid analysis and the program does not close during the analysis. .. Thank you very much Mr. Hakan. It gives 'Insufficient Number of Modes in Dynamic Analysis' error.. Shall we create a new one from 'Modal Analysis->Modal Analysis Cases->New Modal Analysis Case' using the structure tree and write the 'Mode number' in this window? Do we increase the number of mods whose name is shown as 'Modal' during the analysis, then from where do we increase it?..Actually, it doesn't seem to me that it is due to the insufficient number of mods...I guess it would give an error in the geometry control or report if it was created incorrectly in the frame? Another question I have in this project, whether it is the thickness of the helix staircase or other stairs, does not give an error even when I reduce the thickness by 5 cm, or if it gives an error, I cannot see it in the 'ladder reports' or 'reinforced concrete' section... How can I understand. Or is the stairs in my project faulty? How can I be sure? Thank you for your help. Health and well-being..
 
"ghost_13":ogkf5b0p" said:
Yasin Bey, thank you very much, yes, as you said, it was out of memory. When I make the finite element width of the tile 0.5, it saves, now I can make semi-rigid analysis and the program does not close during the analysis. I guess it won't cause any harm in terms of the sensitivity of the result??)...
No, it doesn't...
"ghost_13":ogkf5b0p" said:
Thank you very much Mr. Hakan. It gives 'Insufficient Number of Modes in Dynamic Analysis' error.. Shall we create a new one from 'Modal Analysis->Modal Analysis Cases->New Modal Analysis Case' using the structure tree and write the 'Mode number' in this window? Are we going to increase the number of mods whose name it shows as 'Modal' during the analysis, then from where? Increase the number of mods where it shows 'modal'.
"ghost_13":ogkf5b0p" said:
Another question in this project is the thickness of the helix staircase in the middle, whether it's the thickness of the other stairs, even when I reduce the thickness by 5 cm, it doesn't give an error, or if it gives an error, I can't see it in the 'ladder reports' or 'reinforced concrete' section. ...
By using the bending moments found after the shell analysis, the program makes reinforcements according to the minimum reinforcement ratios given in the ladder parameters. You have to control the upper limits. Also, we cannot define a curvilinear axis in the program. It is useful to look at the maximum moment values in the 3D frame.
"ghost_13":ogkf5b0p" said:
How can I understand that my stairs are faultless according to the Supporting conditions I have defined. Or are the stairs in my project faulty? How can I be absolutely sure.
In the frame view, you can see if the ladder is attached to the surrounding elements. you know.
 
Shall we change the place where Desired mode = 18 is written in the window that opens during the analysis. I'm sorry, I don't understand?... Is it normal for a 4-floor 4-dilated building to give a mode error?
 
"ghost_13":hnv735pj" said:
Are we going to change the place that says Desired mode = 18 in the window that opens during the analysis. I'm sorry, I don't understand?...Is it normal for a 4-floor 4-dilated building to give a mod error?
Structure tree/Modal Double click on analysis/Modal analysis cases/Modal line Increase the number of modes. Your project has more than one rigid diaphragm on each floor... The number of modes may be insufficient and it may be...
 
The problem is solved, thank you again.. The reason for the problem is that the Modal Analysis outputs cannot be saved due to the lack of sufficient disk space on the D disk where the project is registered, and therefore a data named 'Modal' is not created after the analysis... Thanks..
 
Back
Top