Municipality does not accept 25x30 beams

[tasyapı]

Hello friends, the beams on the A and E axes of the project I have uploaded in the attachment 25/30, the relevant municipality says that this is insufficient, but there is no error in the calculation reports. In normal conditions, I think it is correct to make the main beams in toothed floors in more normal sizes than pillow beams. Also, since the air gaps in the architectural drawing should be 60*60 after the beam, I have to make 25/30 beams. but the municipality sends it back as insufficient. How do you think I should proceed?

 

[unver]

Hello My Suggestions --You haven't arranged the support conditions of the ladder, --Fit the ladder on the basement curtain on the basement floor, --Even if the external beams on the A and E axis were saved, I would have done 25/40-50 cm. (Before the municipality deemed insufficient.) Easy. come Unver ÖZCAN

 

[tasyapı]

Thank you Mr. Unver. As a last resort, yes, I will turn those beams into deep beams. Well, don't you think it's true that the main beams are smaller than the pillow beams? Finally, I make these ladder support conditions every time, but I make a mistake in a certain place. Are you looking at this control from the ladder / ladder support conditions? Or should I check it somewhere in the account reports?

 

[unver]

Hello

but don't you think it's right that the main beams are smaller than the pillow beams?

This may vary depending on the situation, but it should be essential to frame the columns and beams.

finally, I make these ladder support conditions every time, but I make a mistake in a certain place. Are you looking at this control from the stair / stair support conditions?

You can determine the stair bracing control and support conditions without specifying the Reinforced Concrete-Staircase-Staircase bracing conditions. Unver ÖZCAN

 

[tasyapı]

I agree with everything you said. but the situation we are constantly taught; It was just like the picture I uploaded. so I make the main beams and under-wall beams as small as possible. I wondered if I knew it wrong. Thank you for your answers, Unver.

 

[NYILMAZ]

I think there is a mistake here. If the height of the beams will remain the same in a project, you can of course reduce the width of the beams that are not loaded. But since the ribs run parallel to the beams in question, it is not correct to make the beams connecting the columns and especially the outer frame beams so thin. I also looked at your project, don't make the outer frame beams that thin (25cm). There are already 30 cm wide columns, at least make 35-40 cm or something to press the columns exactly. In fact, the best thing to do is to make the outer beams as perpendicular as possible, not horizontal, as Ünver Bey said. Other horizontal beams that are wide on the columns should also be centered on the columns. In addition, in an already flat ceiling system, it is not correct to make studs when there is to connect the beams with columns.

 

[tasyapı]

Thank you Mr. Nedim. I will heed the warnings. I wanted to use min values to save the high amount of reinforcement. I wanted to use it when I didn't encounter any error. I am curious about the opinions of the site administrators, but I did not receive any comments from them.

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

thank you, Mr. Nedim. I will take the warnings into consideration. I wanted to use min values to save the high amount of reinforcement. I wanted to use them when I didn't encounter any errors. I'm curious about the opinions of the site administrators, but I didn't receive any comments from them.[ /quote] TS 500 and Earthquake regulations determine the beam size as min 25x30 cm. There are also rules that the beams must comply with, except for the dimension conditions. Apart from these, there are rules and rules that the whole structure must comply with. ideCAD monitors all these rules and reports the conditions that fail to comply.