Moving the center of mass and stiffness to the lower left

statikçim

New Member
THE BUILDINGS ARE UNITED FROM THE BOTTOM AND SEPARATE TOWERS AT THE TOP. THERE IS DILATATION FOUNDATION. WHAT CAUSES MAJOR FAULTS IN GEOMETRIC CONTROL AND HOW TO CORRECT IT. WHAT IS THE REASON FOR KM AND RM TO ESCAPE OUT OF THE BUILDING? I WANT ANSWERS FROM THOSE WHO HAVE KNOWLEDGE AND INTEREST :)
 
I'M NEW TO IDECAD AND THE GROUP. BEFORE OPENING THIS TOPIC, I RESEARCHED THE PROBLEM IN THE FORUM BUT IT WAS NOT ENOUGH. NO ONE CAN ANSWER?
 
Hello, The reason for not doing the analysis is that you give positive elevation to the beams on the shop ceiling floor and their connection with the columns is disconnected. You can see this when you watch a single floor in the solid model. Define these beams on the upper floor and give them a negative level or adjust the column elevations according to the beams. I recommend that you model the basement curtains as a bar on all floors where the shell model is switched to the upper floors. Do not switch between shell / stick model between coats. Columns were drawn on the elements drawn as curtains on the lower floors. Continue the columns from the bottom floor. Do not draw columns on the curtain. Correct the faulty beam connection of K223 beam connection to S26 Column. Arrange the beam joint so that it stays within the column. Km RM was not calculated because analysis could not be performed and they appear at the 0.0 point.
 
I applied what you said (I increased the elevation of the columns and it seems to have improved in 3 dimensions), but this time it gives vertical continuity error, incorrect column-beam junction and beam-level error. I can't understand them, I will be happy if you can help me. Best regards
 
I solved the wrong column beam connection and beam level error, but I can't solve the "vertical continuity error" in the mezzanine
 
"YasinTezel":106qexcn" said:
The columns on the shop floor are +70cm as the upper level, in order to ensure continuity, you need to go to an upper floor (Mezzanine Floor) and enter +70 cm to the lower levels of the column. The columns are intertwined, so you get a continuity error .
Yes, I have done it now. Now analysis can be done (although there are errors in the report) Thank God. Thank you
 
What kind of precautions and corrections should be made to the errors given in the report as a result of the analysis? Where can I increase the number of mods included in dynamic account=?
 
"staticçim":3pajio4t" said:
what kind of precautions and corrections should be made for the errors given in the report as a result of the analysis, where can I increase the number of mods included in the dynamic account=?
I cannot add the final version of the file here because it is 19 MB old. I rar but it still does not accept
 
Hello
"staticçim":29q18dn9" said:
What kind of precautions and corrections should be made to the errors given in the report as a result of the analysis? Where can I increase the number of mods included in the dynamic account=?
You can increase it from the marked place. (click on file.tc)
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
"staticçim":1zmdo33a" said:
what kind of precautions and corrections should be made for the errors given in the report as a result of the analysis, where can I increase the number of mods included in the dynamic account=?
It is necessary to see the project to know where there are errors. You can send the project by sharing.See the attached picture for the number of mods.
 
"unver":182ywrl7" said:
Hi
"staticçim":182ywrl7" said:
what kind of precautions and corrections should be made to the errors given in the report as a result of the analysis? Where can I increase the number of mods included in the dynamic account=?
You can increase it from the marked place. You can share the project via the download site below (click on file.tc)
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Ünver ÖZCAN
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Thanks for your reply, the file is attached. I only increase the number of dynamic modes, it still does not work. There are 5 errors in total in the report, how can I fix it?
 
"NYILMAZ":226en63h" said:
"staticçim":226en63h" said:
what measures and corrections should be made to the errors given in the report as a result of the analysis? Where can I increase the number of mods included in the dynamic account=?
It is necessary to see the project to know where there are errors. You can send the project by uploading it to any upload site and sharing the link. See the attached picture about the number of mods.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
and thank you for your reply. how can i fix the errors. I increase the number of mods but still the same error remains.
 
I can't get an answer because I'm late here. When I made the mod method RITZ VECTORS, that problem was solved but I don't understand it. 1: what is the difference between the ritz vector and the eigen vector 2: how do we increase or decrease the number of mods 3: how can I fix the errors in the screenshot below? thank you
 
Hello, First of all, in your project; -There are perimeter curtains on the basement floor. When you accept rigid as rigid, the number of modes is sufficient according to the current situation. -There are also beam slab edge overlaps in geometry control. Floor edge scratched under some joists.
"staticcim":3ue0967q" said:
1: what is the difference between ritz vector and eigen vector?
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
2: how do we increase or decrease the number of mods
90% mass participation rate of vibration mod (TDY 2007 item 2.8.3.1)
3: how can I fix the errors in the screenshot below?
-You can read the links below about the weakness problem
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
-The cause of the section and reinforcement deficiency problem It should be detected and precautions should be taken accordingly. Good work
 
Thank you very much for your interest. I minimized the errors in the geometric control. There is only one mistake and I can't see it. Below is the list of errors. There are 4-5 errors in total, but I am helpless in these errors and I cannot do it. (floor deflection limit, beam deflection limit, punching safety and lack of reinforcement in beams errors) I don't know how to fix these in the program below
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
awaits your help and wish you a good day.
 
Back
Top