Mold Plan Compliance

erhanbaytak

New Member
Each carrier system has its own weaknesses. For example, the carrier system you see below is the floor plan of a 3-storey project to be built in the 1st zone earthquake zone in 2014. I didn't count the Stud Beams. There are no beam continuities and how healthy is it? and there is no error in the calculation outputs of this carrier system solution. Can such a carrier system, which is intended to be built in the 1st degree earthquake zone, be done because it saves the calculations?
DSC0003.jpg
DSC0004 .jpg
Erhan Baytak Civil Eng Kocaeli
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
beams do not have to come on top of every wall, most engineers on the market right now. They are throwing beams on the wall they see, make sure the workers do not mind the stirrups and the reinforcements on the parts where the stirrups are studs, no problem
 
There really is an excessive amount of stud beams and it seems difficult for the system to function as expected in a possible earthquake (hope we don't see those days...). The stud beam can be made when the necessary stirrup tightening is done, and in the example you gave, the spans are again short, but some engineers (I know many of them for some reason) trying to benefit the contractors and the property owners, say that there will be no columns in the shop, and insert 7-8 m beams into 7-8 m beams. . If I worked at the municipal investigation desk, I would send it back to rearrange the carrier system for such projects. In my opinion, it is healthier to make hollow floor systems with aligned columns and beams instead of slab flooring systems whose axles cannot be formed properly. In such cases, contractors will be told for a few tons of iron, which is increased compared to the slab floor design.
 
"matrax":b0y94md2" said:
beams don't have to come on every wall right now, most engineers in the market are throwing beams on the wall where they are built, make sure the workers put the stirrups and the reinforcements on the parts where the stirrups are studs, no problem
What worker do you think would pay attention to this?
"Godfrey":b0y94md2" said:
There is indeed an excessive amount of stud beams and it seems difficult for the system to function as expected in a possible earthquake (hope we don't see those days...). The stud beam can be made when the necessary stirrup tightening is done, and in the example you gave, the spans are again short, but some engineers (I know many of them for some reason) trying to benefit the contractors and the property owners, say that there will be no columns in the shop, and insert 7-8 m beams into 7-8 m beams. . If I worked at the municipal investigation desk, I would send it back to rearrange the carrier system for such projects. In my opinion, it is healthier to make hollow floor systems with aligned columns and beams instead of slab flooring systems whose axles cannot be formed properly. In such cases, contractors will be told for a few tons of iron, which is increased compared to the slab floor design.
A thousand witnesses are needed to say a carrier system. and it happened just as you said. and projects returned. however, I believe that hollow floor slabs should not be used unless it is absolutely necessary. but here the floor tile was laid and reprocessed.. come on, good luck
 
Back
Top