Load transfer to hollow floor beams

[uzooo]

Hello! In my attached project, I made my rib direction in the long direction in order to carry the load of the D04 Floor to my deep and shorter K19-K16 beams. As my rib length exceeds 4 meters as per the regulations, I defined the transverse tooth as a cassette. In the report, it is 2 times more than the value of the load on the K16 Beam. Do you think this value is too much? I am completely out of the project that I originally intended. How can I carry the entire slab load (or most of it) to my k19--k16 beams? Thank you in advance. Take it easy.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[muhammetboztoprak]

Re: LOAD TRANSFER TO FLOOR FLOOR BEAMERS? You can do it in a transverse female mold plan or you can do it in a cassette model.

 

[HakanŞahin]

I defined transverse teeth as a cassette since my rib length exceeds 4 meters in accordance with the regulation. When I look at the loads on my beams from the D04 slab, the value of the load on my K04 beam is 2 times higher than the load on my K16 beam.[/quote ] It is normal for the load due to the transverse thread and therefore the moment increase.The transverse thread increases the opening moment of the beam into which it is inserted.The information given under the following heading will help you:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[uzooo]

Thank you for the answers, priorities, I read the form... As you said, it is quite natural that there is an increase in torque. First of all, it is concluded that if only transverse teeth are made in the drawing, a completely wrong result will be obtained. After all, it is not a complete cassette system. The goal of transferring the entire load to the K16 Beam is not possible, then, due to the regulation (due to the requirement of transverse teeth at 4 meters).

 

[HakanŞahin]

I'm wondering is it normal for a single transverse tooth to transfer most of the floor load? It's not a complete cassette system after all. The goal of transferring all the load to the K16 Beam is not possible (due to the requirement of transverse teeth at 4 meters) as per the regulation. Then.

Hello again, In the solution with the old approximate classical method, the main carrier beams in the long direction work almost without any load from the floor.But when the floors are involved with finite elements, when the ribs and main beams are calculated together, these beams significantly contribute to the system. Please review the sample projects and moment diagrams in the link I gave you.