German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish I made such a study to put my foundations on the adjacent side to -0.5 (my normal foundation level is -2.5) due to the adjacent order on two sides and the absence of basements of these adjacent buildings. I can't understand why it's high. Is it the proximity of the foundation and the rigid diaphragm to each other? Knowing that it is not a correct solution, I can always get a report by laying a raft foundation in basic dimensions (since the raft does not basically check for cutting safety), two projects are attached. Thank you for your comments and help.
interrupt safety error on continuous basis
- Thread starter gezgin
- Start date
)Dear traveler My suggestions: --The disadvantages are due to the low height of the curtain, -- Both foundations are faulty, -- The ground safety (40 t/m2) is quite high. The ground on which the foundation will sit must be a solid ground. basically don't tap. If you are hesitant to damage the adjacent buildings during the foundation excavation, excavate the AB axis and pour between the foundations and the bulkhead and the AB axis, then switch to the BC axis and complete the other foundations in the same way, -- Connect all the foundations to each other in both directions. Take it easy Unver ÖZCAN
Thank you for your ideas, Mr. Ünver, only there is no basement in my side buildings and I don't even think that there is even a foundation because according to the study report, which is very hard on my very old buildings, I bought 4 (40 tons). When I present this method to the contractor, I don't think he will accept it, given the known market conditions, in terms of time and money. If I can understand it, I will try to handle it with different solutions.