Incorrect Cassette and Rib Drawings

S

serky

New Member
I ran into some problems with rib and cassette flooring when I made a solution with a semi-rigid diaphragm in a Rib and Cassette flooring system. As seen in the pictures, when a cassette slab consisting of 10 cm ribs and 15 cm middle ribs is accepted and the system is solved as a semi-rigid diaphragm, the ribs in both directions appear as 10 cm in the reinforced concrete menu. There is no problem when the same system is solved with a fully rigid diaphragm. There is something wrong with the drawings as well. Looking forward to your help, Thanks in advance.
 
Hello For now; If you are going to make a semi-rigid diaphragm solution, give the thickness of the teeth in different directions in the cassette laying the same value. (As you wrote, the program already accepts the same value) If the thickness of the teeth needs to be different in two directions, make a solution with the full rigid diaphragm option... Good work.
 
Thank you for your interest, Mr. Another issue I was wondering about is that when I define a single tooth perpendicular to the ribs working in one direction in the system that is solved as a semi-rigid diaphragm, the reinforcements of this rib come out much less than the fully rigid solution. Is this a normal situation? Good work.
 
"serky":x4l1bmcz" said:
Another issue I'm wondering is, when I define a single tooth perpendicular to the ribs running in one direction in the semi-rigid diaphragm solution, the reinforcements of this rib come out much less than the fully rigid solution. Is this a normal situation? Good work.
Click to expand...
In one, the floor loads are transferred to the teeth, and the tooth loads are acted on the beams. In the other, the beam-tooth-flooring system is solved together. The calculation results will be different. It may be less.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top