Inclined Floor Identification

[gerber1]

Hello friends, I am having a big problem in defining slanted flooring, I would be glad if you could help me. Can you guide me for the situations I mentioned below? 1- When we look at the attached project, there are slant slab definitions at the top and bottom. Of these, the flat slab (D4) was defined at 0.00 level, and the slab defined at +4.00 level was inclined and joined to 0.00 level. However, although the beam (K8) at the lower level of the slab at +4.00 level penetrates the slab at 0.00, the program does not see this beam at 0.00 and gives a drawing without dividing the 0.00-level slab in the formwork plan. I did not know in terms of solution, but since the beam is not visible in the formwork plan, there is a high risk of being forgotten in practice. 2- Due to the problem at the top, a sloping slab (D105) was defined at 0.00 level at the bottom, and then a flat slab was defined at 0.00 level. it shows on the ground. The reinforcements are overlapping. Maybe editing can be done when the same reinforcement comes out, but if it is different, how will we understand which reinforcement belongs to which flooring? 3- Also, when checking the geometry, it gives vertical continuity error in the columns to which the inclined floors are connected.

 

[gerber1]

For the column warning in the 3rd item, let me add something like this. When I get the curtain details, for example, it gives an opening from -5.00 to +2.74 for the P15 curtain, it gives an opening again from 0.00 on another sheet for the same curtain, that is, it gives the intervals between 0.00 and +2.74 repeatedly. . This will cause great difficulties in practice.

 

[efsane]

I'm waiting for your help too...

 

[Levent Özpak]

Friends, hello, I have a big problem in defining oblique slab, I would appreciate it if you could help. Can you guide me for the situations I mentioned below? 1- When we look at the attached project, there are slant slab definitions at the top and bottom. The top one is flat slab at 0.00 elevation. (D4) was defined, the slab defined at +4.00 was sloped and joined to 0.00. However, even though the beam (K8) at the lower level of the +4.00 slab enters the slab at 0.00 level, the program does not see this beam at 0.00 level and draws without dividing the 0.00 level slab in the formwork plan. I didn't know in terms of beams, but since the beam is not visible in the formwork plan, there is a high risk of being forgotten in the application.

Hello, There is no possibility to define inclined slabs from floor to floor in the program. Therefore, the K8 beam defined at +4.00 level will not work as the edge of the D4 slab defined at +0.0 level.

2- Due to the trouble at the top, the floor definition at the bottom is 0.00 elevation. inclined slab (D105) was defined in the building, then flat slab was defined again at 0.00 level. This solves the above problem, but this time, because there are different slabs on the same floor, the reinforcements are mixed in the formwork plan. When the drawing is taken, it shows them all in one place. The reinforcements are overlapping. Maybe editing can be done when the same reinforcement comes out, but if it is different, how will we understand which reinforcement belongs to which slab.

In case of overlapping slabs on the same floor, it would be appropriate to manually edit the formwork plan. (In order to show only one of the overlapping objects in the mold plan in the program, after selecting the objects, select the -Get only selected objects- option in the Mold Plan Settings and then the mold plan can be taken. Then the same process can be done for the other objects, copy and click. Formwork plans can be combined using paste commands. )

3- Also, when checking geometry, it gives vertical continuity error on columns to which inclined slabs are connected.

P13 and P15 panels at +0.0 elevation are given an upper elevation. Good studies

 

[Levent Özpak]

I am waiting for your help...

Hello, The elevation of the K29 beam on the 2nd floor ceiling in the project is not compatible with the S19 column. Apart from that, there is no problem in data entry. Good work

 

[senem kıraç]

Hello, I have a problem too. How should I combine the slabs with two different slopes in the mansard roof application. I do the modeling with the slab edge without adding beams, but those slabs console work and give Dmin error. The slab thickness is 20-25 cm. Even if I do, I can't fix the problem. The height of the perimeter beams is already increasing due to the condition that it cannot be less than 3 times the floor thickness. This creates a big problem in architecture. I would appreciate it if you could examine the project I sent. note: the project is large, so I could not upload it to the forum. so I deleted the unnecessary parts of the project.

 

[Levent Özpak]

hello, I have a problem too. How should I combine slabs with two different slopes in mansard roof application. I am modeling with slab edge without adding beams, but those slabs console work and give Dmin error. slab thickness is 20-25 cm. Even if I do, I can't fix the problem. The height of the perimeter beams is already increasing due to the condition that it cannot be less than 3 times the floor thickness. This creates a big problem in architecture. I would appreciate it if you could examine the project I sent. note: Since the project is big, I could not upload it to the forum. So I deleted the unnecessary parts of the project.

Hello, You can edit the reinforcement type of the reinforcement axles as top+bottom reinforcement with the "Edit command of Reinforced Concrete Calculation Axis" in the slab auxiliary toolbar.

 

[senem kıraç]

Thank you very much Mr. Levent. I solved the problem thanks to you.