German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish HakanŞahin
Administrator
Dear Relevant, 8.61 demo version is available. You can download the program from the following link:
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
New possibilities developed: 1. Ribbon Menu layout has been added. The ribbon menu can be selected from Settings/General Settings. 2. Reinforced concrete calculation according to ENV 1992-1-1 Eurocode 2, taking into account the in-plane stresses of shells, shear walls and floors (semi-rigid slab reinforced concrete calculation according to the new regulation) 3. Semi-rigid diaphragm analysis system was redeveloped in accordance with the 2017 earthquake code. 4. Fixed issue with finite element meshing of floor tiles and curtains. 5. Added steel railing. 6. Added steel ladder. 7. Model transfer to Tekla program was provided. 8. Added the ability to collect union reports in bulk. 9. Added unification summary report. 10. Added listing of combination deficiencies on the first page of the report. 11. As in Tekla, the 'clip' feature has been added in 3D on the perspective screen. 12. User defined downloads are now printed in the Downloads and combinations report. 13. Transfer to Sap2000 program has been added again. 14. Fixed some problems with connecting inclined slabs to columns and curtains. 15. Beam, column steel etc. PMM, slenderness ratio etc. in design dialogs. all ratios can be sorted from largest to smallest or from smallest to largest by clicking on the table title. In the 16. Shear reinforced concrete dialog, the Select button has been added as in the column reinforced concrete dialog. 17. It has been shown as an option in the stair formwork plan. Cross-sections of the stairs in the formwork plan can be taken. 18. Added the ability to move structures in 3D perspective. 19. Raft and raft edge command added. 20. Beam, slab edge, raft, etc. Removed the requirement to change architecture mode-pattern plan mode or vice versa when entering. 21. Improved ideCAD Wrep possibilities. 22. Drawings and transitions between floors have been simplified. Fixed issues 1. The system cannot be resolved message is received in the analysis. Arrangements were made to ensure that the analysis system was formed correctly. (Nedim Yılmaz's project) 2. When the section control and calculation reinforcement tolerance are used, the raft reinforcements are recovered at 14 diameters, but not at 16 diameters. The problem's been solved. (Ahmet Yıldız's project) 3. Cassette does not save floors. Fixed the situation that led to non-recovery. (Yusuf Tezcan's project) 4. Analysis cannot be performed in the attached project. Rigid connections are not rotated when Rotate structure is done. This was the reason why the analysis was not done. The possibility of entering a rigid connection has been removed, such problems will no longer exist. In cases where a rigid connection is required, the strategy of creating a proper analysis system according to the project was adopted. Because by entering a rigid connection, those problems could not be overcome in a healthy way, and this type of errors was also a problem. (Erdemli's project) 5. No personnel are saved in my project. On the 9th floor, one rib tooth of the N08 and n10 floors comes over the K8-k10 beams. The problem is solved if the initial tooth width of the respective ribs and the ribs in their continuity is set to 10 cm. In addition, in the Analysis Status window on the 9th floor, the warning "N27 slab operation could not be determined" appears on some floors. Rigid arms are formed incorrectly. The error occurred has been corrected. (İbrahim Sarıdurmuşoğlu) 6. Inclined slabs divided by slab edge are not connected to each other (forum-celikbey's project) 7. Rigid arm length of beam was wrong. In the project, the rigid arm of the K14 beam is drawn too long. Fixed. (Ozgur Tuncer). 8. The program was breaking when loading was defined in nonlinear analysis. Fixed. 9. Fixed cases of program slowdown when entering and exiting properties of elements. 10. Column vertical expansion was not working sequentially by name. It works now. (forum design_building) 11. Trimming and analysis problems between bow beam and straight beam have been fixed. 12. Fixed vertical connection problems in finite elements on frets modeled as shells. 13. Rib beam deflection errors were not displayed in the reinforced concrete dialog and in the structure summary report. Fixed. (forum design_building) 14. In a reported project, the floor in the 1st basement floor was not connected to the circular columns and was not load bearing. Fixed. 15. After analysis in a reported project, some beams in the roof appeared as elements on a lower floor. Fixed. 16. There was a deadlock in the slab analysis in the project. Fixed the issue that caused the crash. 17. Optimized for slowness problems in scaffolding projects. 18. I closed the attached project normally while it was running. The problem that was sent as "Can't open the project when I try to open it again" has been fixed. 19. Laying moment is large. Fixed. (helmet from the forum) 20. According to the semi-rigid diaphragm, the system was giving the warning that the system could not be resolved. There was a problem with the flooring nets. Fixed. (Mehmet Ali). 21. In some projects, the load value from the floor was shown as "inf" in the beam loads report. Fixed. 22. Finite elements were not occurring in the 25/50 size screen object. Fixed. 23. In some conditions, the beam table width was calculated incorrectly. Fixed. 24. Arrangements have been made to ensure that pier reports are printed less frequently. The wind loads report and the element loads report were combined. 25. When the curtains were modeled as shells, calculation effects were not calculated in the time history domain. Fixed. (forum-siromar) 26. In a project, the masses were displayed incorrectly in the modal analysis. Fixed. 27. In the analyzed project, when the ribbed slab was turned into a slab, a Slab As(-) warning was received. Fixed. 28. Failed to create mesh on DB02 tile in analysis in a project. Fixed. 29. The direction of the rib beams was distorted on some floors when it was reopened after being saved and closed in the project. Fixed. 30. In a reported project, although beams were not attached to the column, they were included in the joint shear safety check (B). Fixed. 31. When the project drawn in ideCAD Static 7 was opened with 8 and the scaffold was drawn, the program was closing. Fixed. 32. The combination depending on the user defined loading condition was not taken into account in the beam span. It is now taken. (sdonder from the forum) 33. Stirrups were not tightened in the beams connected to the curtains in the short direction. It's done now. (Erhan Mollaoğlu) 34. Although the building in the project was completely symmetrical, the SG ratio of the columns S03 - S04 was different. Network problem that can occur on tiles has been fixed. (forum-proisa) 35. The design loadings and calculation As values of the walls for which the same horizontal force is defined in a project were different. Fixed. 36. Foundations of different thicknesses were not connected. It's done now. 37. In projects with a single-floor, rigid basement, the program was broken when it was desired to generate a report after the performance analysis. Fixed. 38. In floors with more than one rigid diaphragm, no index is given in the floor general settings, but the indexing problem given in the naming has been fixed. 39. When analyzing the project. It was crashing on "(ab)checking" message. The analysis was completed if the long side length of the S44 Column was made 45 cm or if the offset was slightly changed. This issue has been fixed. 40. Building Area was calculated incorrectly in the Risky Building analysis 'critical floor wall effects assessment'. Fixed. 41. Coordinates of beams at different elevations were the same, but were not connected to the same node in the 3d frame. Fixed. (Erdemli Proje-Ms. Sinem) 42. While uploading the project in the demo program, files with the .ide85 extension were not visible. It appears now. 43. There was a deadlock in the reinforced concrete account in a submitted project. (Yusuf Tezcan) 44. The problem of defining slabs in the project was fixed (Yusuf Tezcan) 45. The problem was fixed in the project where there was slowness in processing. (Veysel Özkan) 46. In the analysis settings, the wind load was kgf, but the floor parameters were tf. Confusion cleared. 47. Fixed an issue where element numbers were not generated in the drawing of basement floor formwork plans. 48. Screen scans were distorted when the mold plan was received. It's been fixed. 49. In the project, the steel element was breaking during the design. It's been fixed. 50. In some cases, the slab edge object was dividing and naming joists. Fixed. 51. The problems that caused the unopened project files sent to technical support not to be opened have been fixed. 52. When you enter a value for the damping ratio while defining a new isolator, this value is recorded in the vertical stiffness digit. Fixed. (Yusuf Tezcan) 53. Vertical and horizontal stiffness in earthquake isolators was 10^6 times different from what it should have been. Fixed. (Yusuf Tezcan) 54. In the earthquake isolator report, there were erroneous displays due to shifts between lines. Fixed. 55. In the project, when a formwork plan or column application plan was received on any floor, the program was broken. Fixed. (Ozan Ceylan's project) 56. Changes made in column vertical expansion table settings were lost when we closed the program and opened it. It is no longer lost. (Şükrü Şahin) 57. According to the semi-rigid diaphragm acceptance, the problem of network formation in the 2nd basement floor was resolved in the solution (MY-SA's project) The program was broken when the 58th floor was deleted and analyzed. It is no longer broken. 59. Pier project was not opening. It now opens. (Basri Akyıldız's project) 60. The project file could not be opened. Now it opens (Emre Koç's project) 61. The unit of the load value was not understood in the dome and vault settings. The unit value is now written on the screen. (Forum Ammer) 62. Adjust the offset in the beam settings. When you press the space key in the plan, the offset is deleted. It is no longer deleted. 63. In the project, the moments on the raft were zero. Fixed. (Mediniyetmuhenidi from the forum) 64. In a project, the cases where there were gaps in the floor webs on the first floor ceiling were resolved. 65. In the report 'Continuous basic information and static results', many continuous basis did not print to which column it was linked. It's printing now. (Yusuf Sönmez's project) 66. In Project P04 the curtain was not connected to P02. It's connecting now. (Basri Akyıldız's project) 67. In a tunnel formwork system, some floors were not connected to the curtains. Fixed. 68. During the superstructure interaction, TK1-T2-T3 was not connected to the P01-02-P03 bulkheads in the solution. Now it connects (from the forum kasky's project) 69. According to the half-diaphragm assumption, the solution was not meshing on the D22 tile. It is formed now (Suat Morkoç's project) 70. Laying moments were not calculated in the analysis with respect to the semi-rigid diaphragm. Fixed. (Yusuf Tezcan) 71. The project file was not opening. It now opens. (Cihangir Erdoğan's project) 72. The system could not be resolved in the analysis. Now it is solved.(Yusuf Tezcan) 73. In the analysis display options, the deformation values seemed too large under Ex,Ey and reinforced concrete design envelope. Fixed. (forum-Zeynep Özgür) 74. When you wanted to see the active floor on the perspective screen, all combinations were visible. It now only appears on the active floor. 75. Notifications about U-wall drawing errors, curtain drawing errors and reinforcement continuity have been fixed. (Yusuf Tezcan) 76. Stirrups were not tightened in the beams attached to the curtains in the short direction. It's done now. (Erhan Mollaoğlu) 77. Situations related to incorrect line load value defined on the slab have been corrected. 78. If the 'use head stirrup in VR account' option is deselected in the curtain settings and the curtain is drawn, and the curtain properties are entered again, the line appears active. It is no longer active. (Erhan Mollaoğlu) 79. In a project, the foundation was not modeled in an interactive state. Fixed. 80. Although some continuous foundations were double stirrups, they were shown as single stirrups in the reinforced concrete dialogue and report. Fixed. (forum-emrahkoyuncu) 81. The project with the system cannot be resolved problem has been fixed. (Kubilay Yüksel's project) 82. According to the semi-rigid diaphragm option, D04 was giving a warning of dc in the analysis. Fixed. (Çağatay Özcan's project) 83. According to the semi-rigid diaphragm method in a 4-sided curtain system, the floor horizontal forces were not symmetrical in the solution. Plus it turns out symmetrical. 84. In the 4-column floor system, there was some difference in vertical loads between 7 and 8. Erase the floor, the difference was coming off. Fixed this situation caused by linear load on the tile. 85. The left support P04 curtain of the K14 beam, which was inserted between K36-K44 in a project, was visible. Fixed. 86. In the project, the beam was not connected to the column. The situation that caused the problem has been fixed. 87. When the analysis was performed in the project 8.5, which was analyzed without any problems in version 7, there was deterioration in the floor meshes. Fixed. 88. There was no beam connection with the console floor. Fixed. 89. When I analyzed the project according to the semi-rigid diaphragm, moments were not calculated in the Mesh Floor Reinforced Concrete dialog. It is now calculated. 90. In case of analysis according to semi-rigid diaphragm, the D190 slab was not connected to the curtain object. Fixed. (Eda Dilekçi-Erdemli Proje) 91. In the continuous basic information and static results report, the columns to which the foundations were attached were not written. Fixed. (forum-civilization engineer) 92. The system could not be solved when the curtains were leveled. The problem's been solved. 93. The beam-curtain junction was problematic in the project. The problem's been solved. (forum-kasky) 94. In the attached project, the deformations of the curtains looked wrong. The problem's been solved. (Erhan Mollaoğlu's project) The 95.7 version of the project, which was able to be analyzed, was receiving the message "The system cannot be resolved" in version 8.5. Fixed. (Beta group-İsa Sayın) 96. The number of crossties in each column and in each different type is given in the column application plan and the plan image in the vertical expansion of the column. (Hikmet İkiz) 97. In the project ver8.5, the system could not be resolved in the analysis. Fixed. (forum-H.YILDIZ) 98. Analysis cannot be performed without removing purlin combinations in the project. 99. Bolts of column-beam stiffened faceplate joint were formed incorrectly. It is now correct. 100. He was not designing in GKT in the combined I profile. It's done now. 101. If TÇY 2016 was selected in the project, the design could not be done in the purlins, the results were inf. it seemed. Fixed. 102. When we placed the mouse on the polygon column, the column dimensions written in the column information were not compatible with the polygon column. Now compatible. (Forum spine) 103. When the number of bolts of groups 2 and 3 was entered as zero and modeled in the junction of the butt plate beam attachment, a negative value was read in the vertical edge distance control in the design report. It was corrected. 104. When the beam misalignment was tried to be changed with the space bar key, it did not change according to the defined value. It's changing now. (Rasim Dündar) 105. The axial load value at the upper end of the column was incorrect in the analysis according to the semi-rigid diaphragm. Fixed. (Selahattin Bektaş) 106. The program was breaking when the analysis was made according to the semi-rigid diaphragm. It does not break anymore (İbrahim Bozkurt's project) 107. There was a Jacobian warning in the analysis according to the semi-rigid diaphragm. Fixed. (forum bha's project) 108. There was a Jacobian error in the analysis relative to the semi-rigid diaphragm. Fixed. (forum_prologic's project) 109. While full rigid diaphragm solution could be made in the project, semi-rigid diaphragm solution could not be made. It's done now. (Erdemli) 110. According to the semi-rigid diaphragm, the construction period is 9 sec. value was calculated. Fixed. (forum_aozhan's project) 111. The opening moments of the cassette and rib beams looked wrong in the reinforced concrete dialog in the solution according to the semi-rigid diaphragm method. Fixed. (Ulaş Cemgil's project) 112. In the slab analysis, a mesh was formed in the unslab area in 3d. Fixed. (Mehmet Karasoy's project) 113. There were gaps in the floor meshes. Fixed. (Erdemli's project) 114. In the analysis of semi-rigid diaphragm, the construction period is very large. (Güneri Mühendislik) 115. There are teeth of different thickness in both directions in the cassette flooring, but the thicknesses were the same after the semi-rigid diaphragm solution. Fixed. (from the forum serky and cihanonarici) 116. According to the semi-rigid diaphragm option, the sloped floors were not connected to each other in the analysis. It's connecting now. (forum-miralay's project) 117. In the rib system, the opening moment was not calculated in the semi-rigid solution. Plus is calculated. 118. In the semi-rigid solution of the project, the DB37 flooring was not connected to the KB34 dirt. (Şükrü Şahin's project) 119. According to the semi-rigid diaphragm analysis, a rigid arm was formed incorrectly in one rib of the D01 flooring in the basement floor. Fixed. (forum-damlatpz's project) 120. In the analysis according to the semi-rigid diaphragm, the program was closing. It no longer closes. (forum-serky's project) 121. When the analysis was made according to the semi-rigid diaphragm option, the floor was not attached to the beams. It's connecting now. (forum-siromar's project) 122. A axis of calculation was not drawn on a reported ladder. Fixed. (forum Çelik Bey's project) 123. A shadow was formed on the landing in the solid model in the perspective window of the staircase created with the Route command. It no longer occurs. (Şükrü Şahin) 124. According to the semi-rigid diaphragm, there was a break in the analysis. Fixed. (Yaşar Yılmaz's project) 125. According to the semi-rigid diaphragm, the floor nets in the 1st and 2nd basement floors were not formed correctly in the analysis. It's forming now. (forum brcsnt's project) 126. In the analysis according to the semi-rigid diaphragm, there was a message that the system cannot be resolved. Fixed. (forum-serky's project) 127. According to the semi-rigid diaphragm assumption in the project, no meshes were formed in the slabs D45-46-47 located in the marked area in the solution. Fixed. (forum_design_building 's project) 128. Floor meshes were not formed in the semi-rigid solution. It is now formed (Murat Uçarman's project) 129. According to the semi-rigid diaphragm assumption in the attached project, the mesh of the slab slab was not formed in the analysis. Fixed. (forum-EmreT's project) 130. According to the semi-rigid diaphragm assumption, there was an error in the slab mesh formation in the solution. Fixed (Erhan Mollaoğlu's project) 131. In the semi-rigid solution of the project, floor meshes were formed incorrectly. Fixed. (Emre Turutoğlu's project) 132. In the semi-rigid solution of the project, some slabs did not form nets. Fixed. (İbrahim Bozkurt's project) 133. According to the semi-rigid diaphragm assumption in the attached project, the mesh of KD23 flooring was not formed in the basement floor. Fixed. (Mehmet Dindaş's project) 134. In the project, the longitudinal reinforcements in the header area were drawn incompletely in the curtain details. Fixed. (Yunus Açık's project) 135. Correction was made regarding the clamping length of the shear horizontal reinforcement into the column. (forum EmreT) 136. The detail representation of the E-type elevator curtain on the column application plan was incorrect. Fixed. 137. With TÇY 2016, shear and bending capacities were not calculated in the design of artificial sections. It is now calculated. 138. The secondary beams were not sitting straight on the main beams if one of the 2 selected elements was curved. In the secondary beam layout section, it was suggested that an option can be placed on whether or not it is perpendicular to the elements (Güray Köse) 139. Stud nails were not visible in the project. It appears now. 140. After defining the hall macro for the 2nd time in the project, when zooming in on the screen, the last hall would disappear, and if esc was performed immediately afterwards, the program would be broken. This situation has been resolved. 141. It was possible to enter the properties of the lovers in the front without blowing up the hall made with the hall macro. It can no longer be entered. 142. Arrangements have been made regarding the deflection limit of the purlins and ridges. 143. When I click on the scissors properties, the position of the scissors changes. It doesn't change anymore. 144. Front plate joint between truss-column head can be modeled for pipe and box profiles. 145. In the project, the mesh element combination was not visible in the middle columns. It appears now. 146. Program breaking in case of entering hall macro properties has been fixed. 147. The project was broken, could not be opened. Fixed. (project of forum sergi.ins) 148. In the model created using the hall macro, the number of halls in the project doubled when the hall properties were re-entered. Fixed. 149. If a crane joint was wanted to be defined between the reinforced concrete column and the crane beam, the program would break. Fixed. 150. If the truss groove distance was added, the directions of the last struts were formed incorrectly and the strut and the joint overlapped. Fixed. 151. Diagonal joins were not visible in the design results dialog and 3d. Fixed. 152. Loads were displayed in the wrong direction in trapezoidal sheet composite flooring. Fixed. 153. The program would break if it was desired to enter the design report in the junction of the beam attachment with the overlap plate used between the curved beams in the project. It is no longer broken. 154. Units always appeared in and ksi in the control of single-slip Plate joint plate bending buckling. It has been made to appear according to the selected unit system. In the project created with the 155. Hall macro, although the pavement live load was zero, inf appeared in the reports. Fixed. 156. If the full penetration welded joint is defined between inclined members, the beam shear yield strength appears to be zero for TDY 2007. Fixed. 157. For the distance of the bolts to the plate edge; In AISC 360-10 and TÇY 2016, when controlling the minimum values with tables, it was seen that while the values in the table should be greater than equal in the program, it was sufficient only if they were greater than in the program. Corrected to be greater than equal. 158. If the slab type was changed after the composite slab was defined, the pmm ratios of the secondary beams could not be displayed in the analysis model display. Fixed. 159. Adjustments have been made regarding the slenderness calculation in the central diagonals. 160. The problem in Steel Beam Deflection Controls has been fixed. 161. As long as all beams are not deleted in the project, control cannot be made from the steel design tab after the analysis, and the program is broken. Fixed. 162. The moment arm was incorrect in case of base teeth on the retaining wall.(Selahattin Bektaş) 163. The error in slab slabs, when the column head is defined as tabbed in the punching control, has been fixed. (Erhan Mollaoğlu) 164. Although shear capacity(Vr) is smaller than shear force value(Ve), shear 165. Reinforced Concrete did not give any warning in the dialogue. Forum-yunussacikk's and Basri Akyikdiz project, Ömür Yüksel)) 166. In the report, in the summary report of the building, in the column information, it is stated that lateral displacement was prevented in all floors, but there were unprevented floors in the Column Buckling Calculation (Lateral Displacement Control) report. (forum (hydrkrmn)) 167. Screen-curtain connection seems wrong in column application plan. In the project, it is seen that although the P04 curtain is correctly connected to the P02 curtain, it is not correctly connected to the P01 curtain. (forum-muratkanici) 168. Incorrect stirrup formation in curtain detail in case of connecting the curtain to another curtain (forum-kyuceturk) 169. In case of basement curtains, the problem of creating flooring has been fixed (forum-ssesli) 170. Formwork plan and Basic Application Plan Settings/ No matter what we enter the scale value in the Layout tab. When we get the pattern or basic application plan drawing, the scale text is 1/50. Fixed. (İbrahim Sarıdurmuşoğlu) 171. The mold plans printed in the reports were included in the ladder. 172. Let the representation of the slab linear loads be drawn according to the viewing direction. It is drawn now (Şükrü Şahin) 173. If the continuous foundation is connected to another continuous foundation, write to which foundation it is connected in the Continuous Basic information and Static results report. (Referring to forum_sultanfatih's message) 174. When the section control and calculation reinforcement tolerance are used, the raft reinforcements save at 14 diameters, but not at 16 diameters.(Ahmet Yıldız) 175. As soon as I play with K18-19 beams, the program closes. The problem of closing the program in case of entering a trapezoidal wall has been fixed. (forum-mkrts88) 176. The poses of the basic columnar shoots are given differently in the column application plan and in the reinforcement tables in the basic application plan. Fixed(İbrahim Bozkurt) 177. The scanned area cannot be moved. (Sarıdurmuş) 178. Invalid line type message appears when dwg expot is performed in the attached project. But the drawing is transferred. (Yusuf Tezcan) 179. Bottom and Top definitions should be written on raft flooring main reinforcements. (Basri Akyıldız) 180. Rounding the half between the axis dimensions in the column application (Şükrü Şahin) 181. In the attached project, some layers are deleted when the layer is used. (Şükrü Şahin) 182. Although it is not needed in the 60/30 column, he throws two crossties in the direction perpendicular to the short side. Atmasin(Feridun Yardimoglu on behalf of Tahin Bey) 183. The value written in the Height column in the concrete quantity of the retaining wall is incorrect. (Şükrü Şahin) 184. There are very large numbers in the reinforcement diameters in the pose list in the retaining wall quantity. (Şükrü Şahin) 185. When the properties of the slab edge, route object and primitive objects are entered, I want it to be understood which dialog is entered. (Nedim Yılmaz) 186. The weight area in the drawings The units of the parameters should be given (BETA forum) 187. Although fi/10/10 reinforcement is sufficient in the calculation of curtain Vr (shear strength), the program chooses fi10/17 and gives a warning.(Erhan Mollaoğlu) 188. Stair drawings / drawing properties / sheet / scale 1 Although it says /20, it draws 1/50. In the title text under the sheet, it says ".... drawings Ö:1/50". (Nedim Yılmaz) 189. In the complete project, I want to select certain tiles and take drawings and quantities, but the reinforcements are mitered. (Erdemli) 190. Unnecessary kibble is thrown in the column. (Faruk Bozkaya-Denizli Municipality) 191. The names of curved / arc and continuous arc beams could not be preset. It can now be adjusted. 192. After the analysis, although there is no defect in the Reinforced Concrete Rib tab, I encounter non-recoverable ribs in the Optional reports. The problem's been solved. (forum-muhsin34) 193. In the retaining wall, the horizontal reinforcement does not leave any spacers. If the horizontal length of the curtain wall is 6 m, it was seen 6 m in the reinforcement. Arrangement was made to leave the spacer. (forum Erman Saygın) 194. On the retaining wall, I cannot print the numbers of the reinforcements in the drawing. There is a bill of quantities, but I want each reinforcement to be numbered on the drawing. Done. (forum Erman Saygın) 195. It would be good to show the elevation that we defined earlier in the drawing on the retaining wall. Done. (forum Erman Saygın) 196. It will be good if concrete is automatically added to the drawing in retaining wall and formwork quantities. There is quantity creation, but it would be better if it was directly transferred to the drawing. Done. (forum Erman Saygın) We wish you a good work...