ide static retaining help!...

[tugrul_kacar]

WHEN I ENTER THE ACTIVE FILLING SIDE WITH A ANGLE IN THE REINFORCEMENT DESIGN, THE FILLER SHOULD FIN WHERE THE FOUNDATION AMPLIFIER FINISH. OR SHOULD ASK THE FILL HEIGHT. WHAT ARE YOU SAYING? I THINK I'M WRONG. IF THEY MAKE THE CALCULATIONS ACCORDING TO THESE DRAWINGS, THERE SHOULD BE A FAULT.

 

[HakanŞahin]

Hello, In the images you added, the collapse factor appears as 2.22 in the 1st but 1.23 in the 3rd. Couldn't the screenshot you provide as a crash analysis and the screenshot you show the data be not the same project screenshots? According to the data you provided in the screenshots, the failure analysis is normal for us. Best add your project.

 

[tugrul_kacar]

BOTH ARE THE SAME PROJECT, ONLY WHEN I ENTERED THE DETAILS MENU IN THE 1st IMAGE, I CLICKED WITH THE MOUSE AND AFFORDED A PLACE IN THE SCANNING AREA. THAT'S WHAT I WANT TO EXPLAIN TO ME. IN VISUAL TRAININGS ON IDEN'S SITE, THE FILLING LOAD BEHIND THE WALL (THE ACTIVE) FINISH WHERE THE AMPARTMENT OF THE FOUNDATION BEHIND THE WALL FINISHES. SEE I AM ADDING SCREENSHOTS OF THE VISUAL EDUCATION. I DON'T KNOW, CAN I EXPLAIN? (THE LAST IMAGES I ADDED ARE OF ANOTHER WALL BUT AGAIN SAME RESULT)

 

[Levent Özpak]

WHEN I ENTER THE ACTIVE FILLING SIDE IN THE REINFORCEMENT DESIGN, IT SHOULD NOT SEE WHERE THE FOUNDATION OF THE FILLER WAS FINISHED. IF IT DOES IT, IT MUST BE SWITCHED.

Hello, in the Retaining Wall Reinforced Concrete / Collapse Analysis dialog, the center of the collapse circle can be changed visually for inspection purposes by clicking any point on the screen. the situation does not reflect on the accounts. When you exit the dialog, it can be seen that the Collapse factor does not change. Good work

 

[sereze]

The angle of the filling behind the retaining wall generally goes 2-3 meters in practice and then becomes horizontal. Since we do not have the chance to enter data in this way in the İdecad Retaining module, the program extends the angled fill as much as it can in the slip circle calculation, which of course leads to more negative results in the slip circle analysis. The weight of a non-existent soil is affected. Hopefully it will be fixed in future versions.