I would like to get your opinions about the beamless slab flooring.

kemal kurukaya

New Member
Hello, I would like to receive your criticisms and suggestions regarding this structure modeled with non-beam slab (cork) flooring. 1-Is a perimeter beam required on floors? 2-What should be done to give reinforcement details at various axis and intervals in the formwork plan (Adding a calculation axis makes the reinforcement duplicate) 3-Is it necessary to consider band beams on the ground floor ceiling and mezzanine floor? 4-Are the R and D coefficients appropriate?
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Hi My Suggestions: --The location of the building is Istanbul on the map, check it, fix it, install it and leave, --The bottom left pointed part of the building with un-beamed flooring (due to the architecture) is a bad approach. you'd better shave the tip from the S2 column. The slab opening is also reduced, -- In the current situation, you must select A13 in the wizard, which requires it to be completely curtained. You should make curtains what you give as a column.
"kemal kurukaya":2qyeyo4i" said:
1-Is a perimeter beam required on the floors?
--to make the building stronger, you will have turned to the beam-turned-beam system throughout the building on the outside. --Left Make a lower and lower right L combination curtain and name it as a group, --Stairs are not supported, --There is a lack of raft reinforcement, --Make the slab tension control from the calculation output, there are inadequacies,
"kemal kurukaya":2qyeyo4i" said:
2- What should be done to give reinforcement details at various axis and intervals in the formwork plan (Adding calculation axis makes the reinforcement duplicate)
--You can edit the slab calculation axis geometry with
"kemal kurukaya":2qyeyo4i" said:
3-Ground floor Is it necessary to consider tape beams on the ceiling, mezzanine floor?
--The tape beam is not taken into account.
 
Unver, thank you very much for your suggestions. What would you recommend as an intervention in case of "stress control deficiencies" in slabs?
 
In addition, since we have solved the system semi-rigid, how can we see the situation after reinforcement increase or diameter change in slabs in the shortest way, since the time is longer?
 
In terms of analysis speed; increasing "finite element widths" in tile settings is positive, but can give inconsistent results for 'stress control deficiencies' in Tiles
 
Hello. :39txry2v"]In terms of analysis speed; Enlarging the "finite element widths" in the tile settings is positive, but it can give inconsistent results in terms of "stress control deficiencies" in Tiles[/quote] It is necessary to try both to avoid mistakes.
"kemal kurukaya":39txry2v" said:
In addition, since we solved the system semi-rigid, how can we see the situation after the reinforcement increase or diameter change in the floors as soon as possible?
Get a fast computer if your situation is the most practical solution. There is a general report of flooring icon, click there and you can see the calculation result.
 
Back
Top