I CAN'T GET THE BEAM ENGAGEMENT LENGTH PROBLEM

hanimmühendiss

New Member
1) Although I made the curtain dimensions 30 cm, I cannot overcome the problem. In addition, although the dimensions are the same on the lower floor, it does not give this error on the lower floor, it gives this error on the upper floor. 2) Shouldn't it not give this error in continuous beams? The beam continues on the P99 curtain.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
"hanimmühendiss":28wqp9g7" said:
1)I cannot overcome the problem even though I made the curtain dimensions 30 cm. Also, although the dimensions are the same on the ground floor, it does not give this error downstairs, it gives this error on the upper floor.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Hi, the lack of beam clamping length control also depends on the diameter of the longitudinal reinforcement used in the beam.It becomes difficult to meet this condition when the diameter of the longitudinal reinforcement of the beam increases. For beams of 35 cm height on the attic, the condition of lower reinforcement is 16' and a+b>=Lb is not met. If the reinforcement diameter is 14', the condition is satisfied. To solve the clamping length (ab) problem, the total length of -a + b must be increased. For this Column/wall size can be increased in the relevant direction -Longitudinal reinforcement diameter can be reduced
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
2) Shouldn't it not give this error in continuous beams? =https://we.tl/t-iCv77cbD1G]https://we.tl/t-iCv77cbD1G[/url]
2-Because the K68 and K24 beams connected to P99 are of different height and width, they are in the K24 beam. the miter is broken. (If the beams are made of the same height and width, the miter will not break) Good work
 
Back
Top