I Can't Analyze

O

onurceylan

New Member
Hello, I am attaching my project, I want to analyze, but the system gives a warning that it cannot be resolved. What could be the most obvious reason? I will be glad if you can help in detail, let it be koaly...
 
Re: I CAN'T ANALYSIS Check out the geometry errors. Fix the errors here. Objects on top of each other etc..... you used very different beam sizes in the formwork plan. I think you should make them 25/50 or 25/60. especially you have made the continuation of 25/60 beams 25/50. The continuity of the lower planes of the 60 long beams should be ensured. Using beams with variable cross-section may cause errors in terms of workmanship.
 
Re: I CAN'T ANALYZE Look for errors in the geometry check. In particular, there are objects on top of each other. I looked at the basement. There are pieces of beams under the columns s5, s9, s12, s45, s52. Almost the same beams and columns overlapped on the ground floor. It would be more accurate to model large slab tears with the slab edge rather than with the slab gap. You have faulty flooring. There are problems with the trim edges. There is an error in your connections in general. Rework your project well. If you design and enter stairs, you will not have to deal with intermediate level flooring. For floor gaps, I recommend you to cross with beams at many points. While there is 20-21 cm console flooring in front, the flooring behind is not 12 cm. I think this is enough for now. When your project is a little hand in hand, we can make additions again if necessary.
 
Hello, first of all thank you. I deliberately entered the beam sizes differently because the contractor friend wants minimum iron. In fact, in a 2800 m2 building with such a large console, dilatation, uneven geometry and different floor heights, it wants something absurd, which would not be 80 tons of iron. Also, when I pass the tears with the slab edge, the program wants the slab thickness to be 21 cm. That's why I used the tile gap, I guess it's a program related issue. It is not desired to cross the floor gaps with beams either. Thank you again, take it easy...
 
Hello again, if possible, can you solve the problems in the project I sent and send it to me? Even if it becomes analysisable, it's enough for me... Because I can't solve the problems even though I'm constantly trying. If I'm not taking your time, I would appreciate it if you could help and send it until Tuesday evening... Take it easy...
 
"onurceylan":1f9tbb1e" said:
Hello again, if possible, can you solve the problems in the project I sent and send it to me? Even if it becomes analyzable, it's enough for me... I will be glad if you can help and send it... Take it easy...
Click to expand...
Dear Onur, We are trying to guide you as much as we can here, we are trying to help you save a lot of distance in a short time by sharing information. IdeYapı employees are also trying to solve and answer questions and problems directly related to the program. However, neither of us is in the situation of doing the job of another engineer, nor is our project solving situation out of question. As I mentioned before, there are many in your project. There are important problems. You haven't done much anyway that you want support from us. You have entered something similar to classical architectural geometry. Now you expect us to data the project. More importantly;
"onurceylan":1f9tbb1e" said:
I deliberately entered the beam sizes differently because the contractor friend wants minimum iron. Even in a 2800 m2 building with a large console, dilatation, uneven geometry and different floor heights, it would not be like 80 tons of iron not passed he wants something ridiculous. Also, when I pass the tears with the slab edge, the program wants the slab thickness to be 21 cm. That's why I used the slab gap, I think it's a program-related issue. It is not desired to cross the slab gaps with a beam either. not "absurd", I observe that the contractor is in a hurry to fulfill his wishes. This method is completely opposite to my understanding. After all, it is not in my mind, but the contractor is. "" is not possible. My mission is not to correct the mistakes of others, but to inform them about mistakes and prevent them from being eliminated and repeated. Project management requires responsibility. I think you need to make more careful solutions until you feel this feeling and competence. Best regards... Good work, take it easy.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top