I'm getting a conflict error

M

meryemakdil

New Member
Although I have made all the joints in the project, I am getting the overlap error. I have designed the other places except the foundation and crosses as a source, and I am getting a strength and insufficiency error, can you help?
 
Re: CONFLICT ERROR Hello;
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
if you wish, you can follow this instruction and provide technical support via wetransfer for your project. You can forward it to your team. Good work.
 
Re: CONFLICT ERROR Ms. Nurgül, when entering technical support, only those who have a lock enter and no login is made I have a member registration, it does not accept login
 
Re: CONFLICT ERROR There should be no problem, but you can share your project here via wetransfer, let's check it quickly.
 
Re: CONFLICT ERROR
"nurgulkaya":1gqywsva" said:
There should be no problem, but you can share your project here via wetransfer and we'll check it out quickly.
Click to expand...
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
There are errors such as beam support, overlap error, please help :) When I cut it from the left parts, it slips when the jeans change, how can I find a cure for it?
 
Re: CONFLICT ERROR Hello; If you are going to use a welded joint, divide the beam from the sections corresponding to the columns with the divide command, then connect the beams to both sides of the column with welded joints. If you want to use one piece, use the support joint.
 
Re: CONFLICT ERROR It gives the same error in all combinations, Ms. Nurgül, not only in the source, why are my columns long enough? Can you help?
 
Re: CONFLICT ERROR
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
You can get your project from the link. When the following steps are done, there is no conflict problem. 1- Select and delete all welded joints in the project. While doing this, you can select one and use the right-click select all command. 2- While entering the brace combination, first click on the orange-colored fast mode statement in the main header of the joint to turn off this mode. When the color is not orange, the command is not active. 3- Enter the combination by first selecting the column and then the beam. Adjust the plate widths and the distance between the bolts in the combination menu and make sure that the bolts do not overlap with the beam section or column section in this adjustment. 4- Check for conflicts in the Analysis and Design tab. The result will be 0 conflict errors as below. These changes have been implemented in your project to show you, you will not have any problems if you pay attention to these steps while modeling the joins in your future projects. Note: By the way, if you want to make a welded joint, you should divide the beams from the column intersections as I said. As an example, a support joint was used, there was no need to split the beam in this joint. Good work.
 
Re: CONFLICT ERROR Hello; The geometry control is for reinforced concrete elements. The element steel beam and its connections given as a warning are defined appropriately, there is no problem briefly. Do not use the geometry control for steel. Collision control for steel serves this purpose. Good work.
 
Re: coincidence ERROR
"nurgulkaya":181cxsul" said:
Hi; Geometry control is for reinforced concrete elements. The element given as a warning, steel beams and their joints are properly defined, there is no problem briefly. Geometry control is for steel. Conflict check for steel serves this purpose. Good work.
Click to expand...
But she doesn't do analysis. Nurgül warns that the analysis is not performed due to geometric control, check it. How can I handle it? When you remove the unsupported beam error in geometric control, the analysis takes too long (number of iterations) it turns out too much)
 
Re: CONFLICT ERROR Hello; The problem is that the connection of your individual braces with the beams is not created correctly when the analysis model is set up. With this problem, there are some faulty points in your modeling: 1- Your diagonal placement must be compatible with each other and suitable for the geometry of the roof 2- Your purlins must be placed in harmony with each other for the entire roof surface 3- Since the definition is made on the reinforced concrete structure, all columns must fit on reinforced concrete beams or columns. In the versions, the columns sitting on the slab are not connected to the slab finite elements network. In this case, you make an incorrect analysis. 4- The coating was not defined in your project, we defined it and entered an approximate load value, you can check it according to your region and production and change it if necessary. 5- Since the roof is vaulted, if you choose pipe section instead of box section for your cross members, the joints will be formed more healthily. Your model is attached to save all these arrangements and sections, you can complete your model after making detailed checks.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Best regards.
 
Re: CONFLICT ERROR
"2m project":2k4luj6i" said:
Hi; The problem is that the connection of your single braces with the beams is not created correctly when installing the analysis model. With this problem, there are some wrong points in your modeling: 1- Your diagonal placement is with each other. It should be compatible and in accordance with the geometry of the roof 2- Your purlins should be placed in harmony with each other for the entire roof surface 3- All columns must sit on reinforced concrete beams or columns since the definition is made on the reinforced concrete structure. 4- The coating was not defined in your project, we defined it and entered an approximate load value, you can check it according to your region and production and change it if necessary. 5- Since the roof is vaulted, if you choose your cross members as a pipe section rather than a box section, the joints are formed more healthily. edits and models to save your slices Your copy is attached, you can complete your model after making detailed checks.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Best regards.
Click to expand...
I benefited a lot too, thank you for your work.
 
Re: CONFLICT ERROR
"sahinsukru":1x8oqh4l" said:
"2m project":1x8oqh4l" said:
Hi; The problem is that the connection of your individual braces with the beams is not created correctly when the analysis model is set up. With this problem, there are some faulty points in your modeling: 1- Your diagonal placement must be compatible with each other and suitable for the geometry of the roof 2- Your purlins must be placed in harmony with each other for the entire roof surface 3- Since the definition is made on the reinforced concrete structure, all columns must fit on reinforced concrete beams or columns. In the versions, the columns sitting on the slab are not connected to the slab finite elements network. In this case, you make an incorrect analysis. 4- The coating was not defined in your project, we defined it and entered an approximate load value, you can check it according to your region and production and change it if necessary. 5- Since the roof is vaulted, if you choose pipe section instead of box section for your cross members, the joints will be formed more healthily. Your model is attached to save all these arrangements and sections, you can complete your model after making detailed checks.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Best regards.
Click to expand...
I also benefited a lot, good job.
Click to expand...
Thank you Sukru brother.
 
Re: CONFLICT ERROR
"2m project":leleh9lp" said:
Hi; The problem is that the connection of your single braces with the beams is not created correctly when installing the analysis model. With this problem, there are some wrong points in your modeling: 1- Your diagonal placement is related to each other. It should be compatible and in accordance with the geometry of the roof 2- Your purlins should be placed in harmony with each other for the entire roof surface 3- All columns must sit on reinforced concrete beams or columns, since the definition is made on the reinforced concrete structure, in the current Ide versions, the columns sitting on the floor are not connected to the network of slab-end elements. 4- The coating was not defined in your project, we defined it and entered an approximate load value, you can check it according to your region and production and change it if necessary. 5- Since the roof is vaulted, if you choose your cross members as a pipe section rather than a box section, the joints are formed more healthily. edits and models to save your slices Your copy is attached, you can complete your model after making detailed checks.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Best regards.
Click to expand...
Could you please save and repost in an old version, my lock is out of date?
 
Re: CONFLICT ERROR
"2m project":39bhh8s7" said:
Hi; The problem is that the connection of your single braces with the beams is not created correctly when installing the analysis model. With this problem, there are some wrong points in your modeling: 1- Your diagonal layout It should be compatible and in accordance with the geometry of the roof 2- Your purlins should be placed in harmony with each other for the entire roof surface 3- All columns must sit on reinforced concrete beams or columns, since the definition is made on the reinforced concrete structure, in the current Ide versions, the columns sitting on the floor are not connected to the network of slab-end elements. 4- The coating was not defined in your project, we defined it and entered an approximate load value, you check it according to your region and production and change it if necessary. edits and models to save your slices Your copy is attached, you can complete your model after making detailed checks.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Best regards.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top