I'm getting a beam Nmax error. How do i fix it without making a C30

Re: beam Nmax Hi, enlarge the beam K11 by 5 cm. (2.5 cm-20 cm -2.5 cm) does not give an error. Unver ÖZCAN
 
Re: beam Nmax
K11 Enlarge beam by 5 cm. (2.5 cm-20 cm -2.5 cm) does not give an error. Ünver ÖZCAN
Click to expand...
thank you Unver, I think it will be 2.5-25-2.5. In this way, it will be outside the veil, which will create problems in practice. (probably the contractor will say what the hell is this :) and he won't know for what purpose I did it.
 
Re: I'm getting a beam Nmax error. How to fix without doing C30 Nd<=0.1.Ac. For the fck condition, you need to increase the concrete class or increase the beam cross-sectional area. Berat Bey, the flat between 1-1 and 1'-1' axis is 100 cm. I still get the same beam Nmax error when I define the axis and the raft foundation so that this flat is 90 cm. what is the reason of this?
 
Re: I'm getting a beam Nmax error. How to fix it without doing C30
"tasyapı":12c4oaqf" said:
Nd<=0.1.Ac. For fck condition, you need to increase the concrete class or increase the beam cross-sectional area. Berat Bey , the raft foundation I have defined is 100 cm between the 1-1 and 1'-1' axis. When I define the axis and the raft foundation so that this flat is 90 cm, I still get the same beam Nmax error. What is the reason for this?
Click to expand...
Nd<=0 Under ,1.Ac.
 
Re: I'm getting a beam Nmax error. How can I fix it without doing C30
"construction":3d8ku8ca" said:
when I define the axis and raft foundation of this flat to be 90 cm, I still get the same beam Nmax error. What is the reason for this?
Click to expand...
Hello, Superstructure-foundation Since you are making an interactive solution, the change you make basically changes the element end forces. It is normal. Normal force control of K11 beam: 38.7934- 38.2394= 0.554 tf. It does not recover with a difference of 554 kgf. Nd value at 100 cm is Nd=38.0057 tf. 38.0057- 38.2394= -0.2337. It saves by as little as 233 kgf.
 
Re: I'm getting a beam Nmax error. How to fix C30 without doing
Since you're making a superstructure-base interactive solution, the change you make basically changes the element end forces. It's normal.
Click to expand...
Thank you Mr. Hakan, it was enlightening enough.
 
Re: I'm getting a beam Nmax error. How to fix it without doing C30 When Ünver Bey defines freedom to the beam in such cases, some or similar problems arise, but is this a correct design? What is the physical equivalent of the definition of freedom? Thanks
 
Re: I'm getting a beam Nmax error. How to fix the C30 without Click the double stirrup button on the beam or. Enter your reinforcements a little thicker and try it that way.
 
Re: I'm getting a beam Nmax error. How to fix without doing C30 Hello. Considering the New Earthquake Code, especially with the widespread use of Flexible/Semi-Rigid Diaphragm, the beam NMax problem seems to be more of a headache. In the current Regulation; 3.4.1.2 - In structural system elements to be dimensioned and equipped as beams, the design axial pressure force must meet the condition Nd <= 0.1Ac fck. Otherwise, these elements will be dimensioned and equipped as columns according to 3.3. There is item. The same article is also included in the new regulation draft 7.4.1.2. In this case, I often encounter this problem, especially in buildings that are under the effect of torsion and in systems where heat difference calculations are made. I hope that the ideStatik team will do the necessary work to equip such beams as columns for the next versions and that this will be given as an informative message in the reports, not as an error. Good work. Jesus Dear
 
Re: I'm getting a beam Nmax error. How do I fix it without doing C30 Why am I getting NMax error on this beam I tried 25/50, I'm not centered, I'm constantly getting NMax error. What is your suggestion how can I fix it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top