How to understand earthquake regulation 4.3.2.4

Ismail Hakki Besler

Administrator
What do you understand from the sentence underlined in red below? What is meant by this sentence is A14 and A15, given in Table 4.1 for reinforced concrete structures. Does clause 4.3.2.4 exempt mixed systems from this control?
 
Re: How should we understand the 4.3.2.4 article of the earthquake code Mr. İsmail, I was talking to my friend about this exact issue yesterday. It's definitely been confusing. I have written the situation I understand in the attached image.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: How to understand the earthquake code article 4.3.2.4 The article 4.3.2.4 is valid for both mixed or limited systems with high ductility level. It should be checked in all structures with curtains and DTS=1, 1a, 2 and 2a. Buildings with DTS=1a and 2a (also 3a and 4a) are already LIMITED can't be resolved. Buildings in this DTS class will generally have to be built with a high ductility level due to BMS restrictions. The purpose of this article is that if you are going to solve a building with a curtain alone, I will punish you too. In the article 4.3.4.5, it is necessary to check in A14 and A15, since it says shear + frame that transmits moment with high ductility level. There is no ambiguity in this article.
 
Re: How to understand the article 4.3.2.4 of the earthquake code Hello Mr. İsmail; My thoughts on the subject are as follows; Best regards. Ins. Eng. Basri AKYILDIZ
 
Re: How to understand the article 4.3.2.4 of the Earthquake Code Hello Mr. Basri, You summarized it well, well done. If it's buildings with DTS=1 and 2 at the end of your summary, where does the LIMITED system unresolved warning appear?
 
Re: How to understand Earthquake code 4.3.2.4 article Hello; In Article 4.3.4.3; * Limited ductility level FRAME systems can only be made in DTS3 and DTS4. * If hollow floor or single-direction threaded floors contain curtains, KARMA will be considered ductile and can only be made as A2/B2/C2. LIMITED ductile unbeamed tiled systems that only contain curtains, which I have not given the details of here, can be made as A12/A13/A32. Sorry for the missing information. Best regards.
 
Re: How to understand the article 4.3.2.4 of the earthquake code Basri Bey, Estağfurullah. When we were trying to introduce a new regulation, they made the situation so complicated that we confused what we knew. I think there was a misunderstanding. A31, A32 and A33 type buildings in A3 Ductility level LIMITED systems in Table 4.1 cannot be used only in buildings with BKS=1.5, that is, when DTS= 1a, 2a, 3a and 4a. (See: 4.3.4.1 a) As for the article 4.3.2.4, since DTS=1 and DTS=2 are included, this control should also be done in A32 and A33 type buildings.
 
Re: How should we understand the 4.3.2.4 article of the earthquake code What I understand from TBDY 2018 4.3.2.4 is the "Curtained" systems with or without a gap and with a curtain inside. Because the subsequent (a) and (b) checks are an estimate for curtains. In TDY2007 only high alphaSs were provided with Stair core and elevator curtains. With this item, it is directed to systems with evenly distributed curtains. And especially in mixed systems, this routing is required. Therefore, this clause should be applied to all ductility systems.
 
Re: How to understand the article 4.3.2.4 of the earthquake code Hello Mr. Erhan; It's true that the regulation is quite confusing, I think it's because of our old habits So, let's look at your question in reverse: A31 - Buildings in which all earthquake effects are covered by moment-transmitting reinforced concrete frames with DUCTILITY LEVEL LIMITED. Article 4.3.4.3 states that such buildings can only be used in buildings with DTS3 and DTS4. that is, DTS1 and DTS2 cannot be used either. As long as it does not contain curtains in hollow floor systems, it will be in this class. A32- Buildings where all the effects of earthquakes are covered with voidless reinforced concrete walls with DUCTILITY LEVEL LIMITED. Since there is no frame here, we can think of systems with beamless slab flooring and tunnel formwork-like systems. Article 4.3.4.4 It is stated that for systems containing only beamless slabs, gapless curtain wall systems with limited ductility level can be solved as A32 without DTS limitation. A33 - Buildings where the effects of earthquakes are met by moment-transmitting DUCTILITY LEVEL LIMITED reinforced concrete frames and ductility-free LEVEL LIMITED non-gap reinforced concrete shears. Since no details are given here, slab slab curtain+frame systems It is understood that it can be done provided that the condition Mdev>=0.75Mo is met. Since it is not clearly written in the article and the comment of Nuray Aydınoğlu on this subject is taken into account, it can be said that the systems with hollow floor tiles will not be included in this class. I think this confusion will continue for a while. Every time we read it, a different interpretation comes to our mind. Best regards.
 
Re: How to understand the article 4.3.2.4 of the earthquake regulation If you examine the tbdy 2018-education manual prepared by the chamber of civil engineers, page BA-1/15 has given a very good example of choosing the number of r floors. According to A15 and A14 structures, I understand that we have no business with 4.3.2.4.
 
Re: How to understand the article 4.3.2.4 of the earthquake code
"ottomancagatay":gw0y6pg9" said:
tbdy 2018-training manual prepared by the chamber of civil engineers on page BA-1/15 If you give a good example, I understand that we have nothing to do with 4.3.2.4 according to A15 and A14 structures.
Çağatay Bey, when we first read article 4.3.2.4, this condition was only applied in curtained systems (high ductile: A12, A13 or limited: A32). This is how I understood it when I first read it. I even wrote a description on the image
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: How should we understand the Article 4.3.2.4 of the Earthquake Code? Let's pretend it is. In this case, as there is only one curtain, article 4.3.2.4a will not be provided. If you look at it this way most of the time the 4R/5 multiplier will come into play. It's a little cruel. That's why I said... :)
 
Re: How should we understand Article 4.3.2.4 of the Earthquake Code
"MaFiAMaX":2380dspr" said:
Ismail Bey, I am aware that by defining the group on the core shears in the regulation, the internal force is calculated at a single point, but if that's the case, the building Let's just assume that there is only one "H" shape and the core in the center. In this case too, item 4.3.2.4a will not be provided because there is only one screen. If you look at it that way, the 4R/5 multiplier will often come into play. It's a bit cruel. .. :)
Yes, it's very cruel. We talk about this situation with the teachers. The regulation also stated clearly so that you can buy the curtains by combining them.
 
Re: How to understand the article 4.3.2.4 of the Earthquake Code
"2m project":6sjdh9mr" said:
A33 - Reinforced concrete frames with DUCTILITY LEVEL LIMITED and non-gapless reinforced concrete shears with DUCTILITY LEVEL LIMITED Since no details are given here, it is understood that slab-floored curtain+frame systems can be constructed provided that the condition Mdev>=0.75Mo is not clearly written in the article and this Considering the comment of Nuray Aydınoğlu on the subject, it can be said that the systems with hollow floor tiles will not be included in this class. I think this confusion will continue for a while. Every time we read it, a different interpretation comes to our mind. Best Regards.
Mr. Basri Hello, we keep modeling with high ductility level outside and only ductility. If we take a look at the conditions of limited and mixed systems No curtain ductility level limited systems, if both the frame and the threaded flooring are "curtain-free" DTS 1 and It can't be done in DTS 2 (4.3.4.3) As for the conditions under which it is allowed to perform Gear and Plaque flooring according to limited and mixed ductility level in Curtain Wall systems. If we want to model toothed flooring, DTS 1 and DTS 2 are allowed in mixed system and we need to meet the condition Mdev>=0.75Mo. Otherwise, the system is not accepted as a mixed system and the regulation requirement is not met. I see this as the reason why "hollow floor" is only mentioned in A23 and A24. (I understood this from the term "no pitch" in 4.3.4.3. I mean, if it doesn't contain pitch, you can't do it in DTS 1-2, but if you can switch to the mixed system with pitch, that is, if there is a serious pitch that meets the condition of Mdev>=0.75Mo, you can do it according to A23 and A24) DTS1 and In DTS2, a platter system with Curtains can be made. If Mdev>=0.75Mo, we can choose mixed or limited ductility level (A21-A22-A31-A32), but if Mdev<0.75Mo, we see the item (4.3.4.7). and the system necessarily enters the A31. (R=4 D=2.5 and BYS >= 7 condition is required) (that is, we use A31 conditions even though the system is curtained) We are faced with a regulation with frequent transitions between items, and therefore confusion is very normal.
 
Re: How to understand the article 4.3.2.4 of the earthquake code Erhan Bey; As you mentioned, if there is only one group of curtains, such as the elevator perimeter, in the building, and if this group of curtains has Mdev > M0/3, I think that the regulation means with 4/5R increment: In case of a loss of bearing capacity in this curtain, serious damage may occur to your structure. For this reason, it means to design your structure to be safer by increasing it by 4/5R." This situation is valid for all curtains, in fact, we talked in our previous correspondence that this control should be done for all curtain systems, and if 1/3 or 1/6 controls are not provided even for a single curtain, the 4/5R condition should be applied. In summary, as İsmail Bey said, it seems quite logical to control the curtain group. Best regards.
 
Re: How should we understand Article 4.3.2.4 of the Earthquake Code
"Ismail Hakki Besler":3sf8jid1" said:
"MaFiAMaX":3sf8jid1" said:
Ismail Bey, In the regulation, there is a single group definition in core shears. I realize that at some point you have internal force calculated, but if it does, let's assume there is only one "H" shape in the building and the core in the center. In this case, as there is only one curtain, article 4.3.2.4a will not be provided. If you look at it this way most of the time the 4R/5 multiplier will come into play. It's a little cruel. That's why I said... :)
Yes, very cruel. We talk about this with the teachers. The regulation also clearly states that you can combine the curtain arms and buy it.
Mr. İsmail Hello, I think it is an appropriate item. Although A1 irregularity has no sanction in the regulation, we all know the negative effects of torsion. The reason for putting the item is both to prevent the elevator and stair curtains from eating the bread "so to speak" (it used to increase alfaS, now Mdev will increase it greatly) and (although these curtains are not always in the middle of the plan, they can sometimes be stuck to the right and left). and seriously pulling the center of rigidity towards themselves and away from the center of mass) to prevent torsional irregularity that may occur due to these masses. I find it to be a well thought out item
 
Re: How should we understand the article 4.3.2.4 of the earthquake code Hello, I think article 4.3.2.4 tells us; If your design is made of reinforced concrete and the entire load-bearing system consists of shears (with or without gaps) or if it consists of steel braces; Place these curtains appropriately, following the items (a) and (b)... For example; When using an average of 2 m long curtains, get up and do not use 6~8 m long curtains (a) Do not neglect the side axes as the sections of your curtains are proportional, because one of the most basic geometrical rules of design according to earthquakes (according to the literature) is to place the curtains on the side axles. For this reason, provide the item (b) to be sure of the adequacy of the curtains you put on the side axle. This clause is not binding for mixed systems... because in 4.3.4.6 the control in mixed systems is given separately and no reference is made to clause 4.3.2.4.
 
Re: How should we understand the 4.3.2.4 article of the earthquake code
"Mirza":lwejf84e" said:
Hi, I think article 4.3.2.4 tells us; If your design consists of reinforced concrete and the entire load-bearing system consists of shears (with gaps/ no gaps) or steel braces, place these curtains appropriately by complying with (a) and (b)... For example, when using curtains with an average length of 2 m, a Stand on the ground and do not use 6~8 m long curtains (a) Do not neglect the side axes as the cross-sections of your curtains are proportional, because one of the most basic geometric rules of design (according to the literature) is to place the curtains on the side axes as much as possible. In order to be sure of the adequacy of the curtains you put on the side axle, also provide clause (b).For mixed systems, this clause is not binding... because in 4.3.4.6 the control in Mixed systems is given separately and no reference is made 4.3 To clause .2.4.
M Hello Mr. irza, in 4.3.2.4 he would not talk about "all" curtained structures, and if he did, he would use the expression "all" as you said. The sole purpose of this article, whether columns and curtains are used together or completely curtained structures - is to prevent the curtains from being homogeneously distributed in the building and from gathering only in one area. (in short, not to leave the elevator and stairwell with curtains and say that you have solved the curtained structure) You also stated that this item will not be used in mixed systems, which is a wrong interpretation and is used in every building that contains curtains. Clause 4.3.2.4 must be applied at each ductility level that satisfies the following two conditions. 1) the building will be dts 1 or dts 2 2) it will have curtains
 
Re: How should we understand Article 4.3.2.4 of the Earthquake Code Mr. Ömer, If we accept that it is as you understand it (I am not saying it is wrong, we are just discussing it) you can use the article 4.3.4.6 (mixed) or article 4.3.4.5 (high) How should we understand? So are you saying: 1. We will ensure that the total overturning moments of the bulkheads are greater than 0.75 (if it does not, R and D will change) 2. Then we will look at the condition of &lt;1/3 of the overturning moment received by each wall 3. Then we will see that the side walls are &gt;1 We will check the /6 condition. We will do the same logic for 4.3.4.5... 1. Curtain total tipping moment is 0.4 <M<0.75 şartına bakacağız sonra bu şart sağlamıyorsa R ve D değişecek vs..
2. Her bir perdede 1<3 şartına bakılacak
3. kenar perdede > The 1/6 condition will be considered. In both cases, if the 2 and 3 items are not met, 4/5 R will be used. Let&#39;s assume that the specification was written using a spelling language as you said (with precision... if it meant &quot;all&quot;, they would not hesitate to write there). So would I be wrong to ask this? Shouldn&#39;t it be said that &quot;Article 4.3.2.4 de will be complied with&quot;, which is also valid for clauses 4.3.4.5 and 4.3.4.6 and is much more essential than the expression &quot;all&quot;? I understand you, it&#39;s on the safer side, if you want, you can apply this to every pitch in every structure regardless of DTS, but you will apply it on every pitch in every system in DTS1-2, no matter what the carrier system is[/ u]&quot; is a forced comment in my opinion... As a result, Mr. Ömer, I am not convinced and I still maintain my opinion on this article and I think it only applies to curtained systems .. best regards...
 
Back
Top