How to fix "Interrupt security not maintained" error

Re: beam and column error
"aykuttt_35":1mxlpr7k" said:
I am using idecadi for the first time. how can I solve these errors.
Click to expand...
In cases where Beam Shear Safety is not provided, beam size can be enlarged, higher strength concrete can be used, improvements can be made in the carrier system so that the shearing force on the beams will be reduced, etc... In case of insufficient ground safety, If the foundation system is a continuous foundation, ampatments can be enlarged, beamless raft foundation system can be applied, If the foundation system is beamless raft, the raft boundaries can be enlarged, ground improvement can be made. etc...
 
Re: beam and column error
"Levent Özpak":3t8b9iwx" said:
"aykuttt_35":3t8b9iwx" said:
I am using idecadi for the first time. How can I solve these errors.
Click to expand...
In cases where Beam Cutting Safety is not Provided; beam size can be enlarged, higher strength concrete can be used, improvements can be made in the carrier system so that the shear force on the beams will decrease, etc... In case of insufficient ground safety, if the foundation system is a continuous foundation, ampatments can be enlarged, a raft foundation system without beams can be applied, raft borders can be enlarged, ground improvement can be made etc...
Click to expand...
Does it work to play with reinforcements? It was solved by increasing the pressure reinforcement in the deflection error, does it work in this problem?
 
Re: beam and column error
"mkrts88":2qt3koqo" said:
"Levent Özpak":2qt3koqo" said:
"aykuttt_35":2qt3koqo" said:
I am using idecadi for the first time. How can I solve the errors.
Click to expand...
In cases where the Beam Shear Safety is not provided, the beam size can be enlarged, higher strength concrete can be used, improvements can be made in the carrier system so that the shearing force on the beams will be reduced, etc... In case of insufficient ground safety, If the foundation system is a continuous foundation, ampatments can be enlarged, beamless raft foundation system can be applied, if the foundation system is beamless raft, the raft boundaries can be enlarged, soil improvement can be made, etc...
Click to expand...
is it useful to play with the reinforcement? It was solved by increasing the pressure reinforcement in the deflection error, would it work in this problem?[/quote ] If the Cut Safety issue is due to a lack of stirrups, choosing larger stirrup diameters may solve the problem.
Click to expand...
 
curtain cut safety I could not exceed the cut-off safety on P2 and P3 frets. Is there something I missed or did wrong. what can i do to solve the problem. I will be glad if you help.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
IN BEAMERS WITHOUT CUTTING SAFETY, INCREASING BEAM SIZE DOES NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM, REVERSE THE MOMENT OF INERITION OF THE BEAM IS INCREASED, THE GROWTH OF MOMENT OF INERGENCY MEANS INCREASED CUTTING FORCES ON THE BEAM. BEAM SIZE SHEETS AND NEVER SAVE CUTTING FORCES. THE ONLY SOLUTION TO THIS IS TO INCREASE THE BEAM STOCK DIAMETER AND STOCK RANGE BY REDUCING THE REVERSE BEAM DIMENSIONS.
 
Hello -- P1 curtain has a continuity error in the basement, like the others, you should give +90 cm elevation, --When this correction is made, it gives 72 errors, --Fix the errors in geometry control, --P1 curtain width 25 cm+beam height 30 cm total beam width Do not exceed 55 cm. If it is not balanced, add curtains. Unver ÖZCAN
 
"civil engineer":179amv58" said:
what did you do, Unver, can you send me a chance, where am I going wrong? How can you comment
Click to expand...
It seems good to me. Support the stairs, solve it together with the structure, in the final calculation, make the width of the finite elements 0.25 m and finish the solution. Unver ÖZCAN
 
"civil engineer":2wvw5sdo" said:
I DID NOT DO WHATEVER I DO WITH THE PROJECT, I CONTINUOUS ERRORS EVERYWHERE PLEASE HELP ME
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Click to expand...
Hello, Frequently asked questions for solving column beam joint shear safety problems, you can review item 9.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
In TBDY 2018 article 7.4.1.2, the design axial pressure force must meet the condition Nd <= 0.10 Ac fck in the structural system elements to be sized and equipped as beams. Otherwise, these elements must meet the condition 7.3' The program does not allow the beams to be designed as N>0.10 Ac fck. Therefore, this error message is given. Detailed information is given in the section "Beams that do not meet the Nd<=0.1*Ac*Fck condition" in the Beam report. For solving axial load problems; -Increase beam width/height ( Increasing the beam dimensions, especially the beam height, will increase the beam stiffness, thus the beam axial force. It may not always be a solution.) -Higher strength concrete can be used. - Arrangements can be made on the carrier system to reduce the axial load on the beam. -Beams can be sized and equipped as columns according to TBDY 2018 article 3.3. (Dimensioning and reinforcement of beams as columns is not done automatically in the program. It is under the control of the user.) If you want to ignore the Nmax error in the program and apply a reinforcement solution like a column; In the Beam Reinforced Concrete dialog, in the Capacity design tab, check if the capacity ratios are below 1. If the capacity ratios are below 1, the beam is operating at minimum. (If the capacity ratios are above 1, the longitudinal reinforcements can be increased and the beam can be reduced below 1 by defining the web reinforcements) -SZ30 column is modeled on the ground floor and not modeled on other floors. - In the final analysis, we recommend that the finite element widths of the slab, curtain and raft be reduced and analyzed. Good work
 
Unver, first of all, I would like to thank you, but I cannot open it, I am using the current program, I cannot download the new version 10.20, how should I do it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top