How is the correct node data entry

[BetonArt Yapı]

Hello, I have a general question, does the element outer axis or inner axis change the calculation when creating a node? Computing between connecting elements? My reason for asking is that I always get a K error on basics, could it be related to that? I often encounter this when the continuous foundation starts and ends in the direction of the Veil, while it stays a little in the other direction. What is the correct node data entry in terms of program data entry? I was getting a K error when the misalignment of the underlying ST52 Continuous basis and the continuous foundation passing under the P02 curtain was centered on the element. Is it necessary to give the continuous basis towards the curtain end in this type of joints?

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

I look forward to your reply. Good work...

 

[BetonArt Yapı]

Re: Node I couldn't solve the ST52 baseline. I'm waiting for your help.

 

[unver]

Re: Node Hello My Suggestions --You have chosen mixed in the Y direction, make it high, --The curtains around the building are not the basement curtain, but remove the tick, --The under-curtain foundation is not continuous, so it does not save, (you can also make the curtain next to it) .) Corrected project in line with my suggestions above. In addition, --Make the ladder support and solve it together with the structure, --There are B errors in the columns, correct it, --I recommend you to solve the raft without a beam. Ünver ÖZCAN

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[BetonArt Yapı]

Re: Node

Hi My Suggestions --You have selected mixed in Y direction, make it high, --The curtains around the building are not the basement curtains, remove the tick,[/b ] --Since the foundation under the curtain is not continuous, make it continuous,(you can also make the curtain next to it.) The corrected project is attached in line with my suggestions above. Additionally --Make the ladder support and solve it together with the structure, --There are B errors in the columns fix it, --I recommend you to solve the raft without beam Unver ÖZCAN

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

First of all, thank you for your suggestions. Did you say because the part related to the basement curtain is marked as a rigid floor? I am using the basement curtain situation incorrectly, then is it correct? Only in case of short flooding? will be used? Is it wrong to mark on the curtains that do not continue? will it be ru? It was always mentioned in the forum that it is necessary to define between the start and end points for curtains. Thank you for the corrected parts, stay tuned...

 

[HakanŞahin]

Re: Node Hello, Continuous foundation misalignment, dimensions, plate height, all affect the analysis because we have changed column-continuous-foundation and raft finite element connections, if any. The results also vary as they are all resolved together. You can see the differences in the analysis model in the 3D frame. In your project, on the other hand, the cutting forces change direction at the basic junction points and there are big jumps in the cutting force values. Continuous foundation misalignments on 2.7 and I axis have been changed to overcome the shear insufficiency. You can download the corrected project from this link.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Large jumps in shear force values may be a software situation, we will notify your project to R&D for investigation. Good work

 

[BetonArt Yapı]

Re: Node

Ünver ÖZCAN

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

UNVER Sir, in the file you sent, you connected the ST52 basis from the other corner point on the column, not the column-beam joint won't it cause a change in load status? is it right to do this?

 

[BetonArt Yapı]

Re: Node Point

Hi, Continuous foundation misalignment, dimensions, plate height, all affect the analysis because we are changing column-continuous-foundation and raft finite element connections, if any. The results also change because they are all solved together. You can see the differences in the analysis model in a 3D frame. In your project, the cutting forces are constantly changing direction at the basic junction points and large jumps are seen in the shear force values. To overcome the shear force insufficiency, you can see the differences in the 3D frame. Basic misalignments have been changed. You can download the corrected project from the following link.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Large jumps in shear force values may be a software situation, we will report your project to R&D for review. Good work[/quote ] Mr. Hakan, thank you for your reply, I also saw the change in shear force under the column and that the K error also depends on I'm thinking. I also think the dimensions are sufficient. What is your opinion on the first part of my question? Does creating the node in the column core and creating it on the element outer axis make a difference in the calculation? Especially for continuous basic data entry.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

knot+point+ location#p7970

 

[HakanŞahin]

Re: Node

. What is your opinion on the first part of my question? Does creating the node on the column core and on the element outer axis make a difference in the calculation? Especially with the continuous base for data entry viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1430&p=7970&hilit=node+point+location#p7970

I don't understand your question, show both cases in small sample projects and add them to the message, let's examine if there is any difference. The answers are valid for version 7. If you constantly examine the basic report in your project, you can see that the same problem does not exist.

 

[BetonArt Yapı]

Re: Nodal Point

Hi, Continuous foundation misalignment, dimensions, plate height, all affect the analysis because we are changing column-continuous-foundation and raft finite element connections, if any. The results also change as they are all solved together.You can see the differences in the analysis model in the 3D frame.In your project, the shear forces are constantly changing direction at the basic junction points and there are big jumps in the shear force values. To overcome the shear force deficiency, the 2.7 and I axis Changed the constant misalignment of the foundations on it. You can download the corrected project from the following link:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Large jumps in shear force values may be a software situation, please send your project to research to examine this Good work

Mr. Hakan, can you write on what basis did you determine the direction of madness in your transaction here? i'm sorry too.

 

[HakanŞahin]

Re: Node Point

Hakan Bey, can you tell us how you determined the direction of eccentricity in your operation here? As there are continuous foundation misalignments, grid intersections, element lengths and rigid arm sizes are affected.This arrangement of course also affects the openings of other continuous foundations, but there was a decrease in the shear force in the continuous foundation with shear failure.

 

[batuhann28522]

Re: Node good afternoon. The 2 intersecting beams do not merge as I have thrown in the rar file. I wasn't experiencing this situation in ide7, am I doing something wrong?

 

[Levent Özpak]

Re: Node

good day. 2 intersecting beams in the rar file do not merge as I did. I was not experiencing this situation in ide7, am I doing something wrong

Hello, In the pictures you added There is no problem in column beam connections.The situation in the plan view is due to the trimming of the scans.

 

[batuhann28522]

Re: Node Point

Hello, There is no problem with the column-beam connections in the pictures you added. The situation in the plan view is due to trimming the scans.

Thanks for your answer, but something like this It happened when I did it. K04 beam coming from the left side doesn't have to show as continuing and split it directly from the end of the column. I have another question, there is an architecture like the "Ask beam" picture in the rar file and how can I do this, do I have a chance to shrink the beam partly? No, but I would like to get your opinion.

 

[vforvendett4]

Re: Node

good day. The 2 intersecting beams do not merge as I have thrown in the rar file. I wasn't experiencing this situation in ide7, am I doing something wrong

Hello, There is no problem in the column beam combinations in the pictures you added. The situation in the plan view is due to trimming the scans.

Where are these beam combinations viewed in IDECAD 10?

 

[vforvendett4]

Re: Node

good day. The 2 intersecting beams do not merge as I have thrown in the rar file. I wasn't experiencing this situation in ide7, am I doing something wrong

Hello, There is no problem in the column beam combinations in the pictures you added. The situation in the plan view is due to trimming the scans.

How do we see if the beams are connected in this way in idecad 10?

 

[YasinTezel]

Hello, press the right mouse button on the perspective screen, select "Analysis Model" in the menu that appears. Analysis system can be examined with the following settings in the display options.