Ground security is negative

[ramisvardar]

basically ground safety negative error I increased the width of the foundation, centered the panels etc. but the error is not gone, what can i do. There is a b error in some of the columns, can I get your ideas on how we should intervene in such errors? Thank you in advance, good work. If you notice any other errors, please indicate that I did not see them.

 

[ramisvardar]

Re: GROUND SAFETY IS NEGATIVE Let me add one more thing, it may not draw the cross-section while getting the basic application plan.

 

[Medeniyetmuhendisi]

Are you new to İdecadle or are you a recent graduate? You can easily find out what the column and foundation errors are from the program or from the internet, for example, the Z error in the foundation is negative, so the ground does not carry the foundation safely. It is not difficult to do, actually, if you are a civil engineer graduate, you can remember from the lessons or you can research, increase the width of the foundation or increase the upper width of the foundation, there are many more options, you can change the foundation system. you can look there. It is the simplest way to enlarge the column, but if it becomes an architectural problem, it is necessary to increase the concrete class or to play with the beam reinforcements.

 

[Medeniyetmuhendisi]

In addition, you did not have wall load on the floors, be careful with the live load coefficients, it is also useful to research. You have assigned a live load to all of the beams.

 

[ramisvardar]

First of all, some errors cannot be solved with the same methods in the program, it may be necessary to intervene in different ways for the same error, sometimes there may be interesting errors that I encountered for the first time, now I did what you said in the project and the errors did not go away, otherwise I fixed most of them until the answer came. At the moment, the problem is that some drawings do not give a cross section. I am investigating the reason for this. Of course, advice can be given here, but I believe that it will help friends who are having trouble with the issues in this topic, provided that the questions asked are helped, regardless of who is a new graduate. Researching on the internet is not a new idea, we are already implementing it.

 

[unver]

Hello. The program gives a warning. Solve it as a semi-rigid diaphragm to create a default diaphragm at this floor, --Mark the basement curtains as non-continuous on the floor, --Take the stair loads, --Check the wall loads, floor loads, --you can remove the K69 beam on the floors --K74 beam and K75 does not provide consistency. You can enlarge the K74, --you'd better do the foundation without the pile --T22-T23-T21-T22 is not continuous in the drawing, if you give the angle between them 30 degrees, it will draw it continuously, (parameters, general reinforced concrete settings, the angle in between is small.....) - -You will break the foundations that fail to secure the ground, --For B errors

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You can have a look. Take it easy Unver ÖZCAN

 

[HakanŞahin]

if you notice any other errors, please let me know that I can't see them.

1. The continuous foundation joint point must be entered in the same coordinate as the panel and/or column node. For example, the continuous foundations intersect at 1. They need to intersect at 2. You should always arrange your foundations accordingly. 2. Instead of defining floors as much as the height of the basement, it would be more appropriate to extend the columns of the ground floor as much as the basement floor and enter a basement wall between the columns. Then, for the basement walls, the "this You need to tick "the curtain is the basement curtain" option.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Good work

 

[ramisvardar]

Thank you very much for your suggestions and interest. When you say taking the ladder loads, when you define the concrete concrete calculation axis for the ladder and make the ladder analysis, isn't the load given?

 

[ramisvardar]

Why may the drawings not show cross section and how can we solve

 

[Levent Özpak]

why there may not be cross sections in the drawings and how can we solve it

In the program, the default section lines are passed where the largest tiles are located. Since no tiles are defined in the basement floor, the sections are not drawn automatically. After taking the basic application plan, Drawing You can get a cross section from any direction with the "Formwork-Foundation Plan section" command under the menu.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Thank you very much for your suggestions and attention. When you say taking the stair loads, when you define the concrete concrete calculation axis for the stair and perform the stair analysis, does the load not be given?

No. Stair reinforcement axes, stair reinforcement axles, and stair design moments Stair abutments are arranged according to the solution conditions independent of the structure in the project. Therefore, it is appropriate to define the stair loads to the relevant elements. Note: Stair reinforcement axes and drawings have been developed for straight arm ladders.

 

[ramisvardar]

Thank you very much, in the light of the information you provided, my work was more smooth and ideal. I wish you good work.

 

[ramisvardar]

What is the reason why the stair fittings are so messy in the drawing, or my representation is different?

 

[Levent Özpak]

makes the stair accessories very messy in the drawing, why is it, or the display is different

Your question was actually answered in the note section of the previous message.

Note : Stair reinforcement axles and drawings have been developed for straight arm ladders.