GROUND SAFETY NEGATIVE ERROR

erkmeensinan

New Member
Good day, my teachers, first of all, I am having problems in a static project in a job I have just graduated from. The errors I have received are high in the relative floor drift and increase the rigidity, the ground safety is negative, I would be glad if you could show me the solutions to these mistakes with the logic. I wish everyone a good day. File Download Link:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
"erkmeensinan":39yefpem" said:
Good afternoon, my teachers, first of all, I am having problems with a static project in a job I have just graduated from. Among the errors I have received, the relative floor drift is high and the rigidity is negative. If you can show me the solutions to these mistakes, I wonder what are the solutions to these mistakes. I am happy. I wish everyone a good day. File Download Link:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
[ /quote] Hello, In the project you have added, the ground class ZE type is a very weak ground and the system stiffness needs to be increased in the X direction, which has a relative floor drift problem. You can review the following links about the relative displacement problem and possible solutions.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
-You can amatman to solve the ground bearing strength problem. Good work
 
"yigitfrat":3i8930h9" said:
Hi, I'm having a similar problem, thank you in advance if anyone wants to look and share information.
Hello, Ampatman and foundation width can be increased in general to solve the problem of bearing capacity in continuous foundations. Notes: -Analysis In the Settings/Basic floor tab, I recommend checking the "superstructure interactive solution" option to perform analysis (In the current state of the project, when superstructure interactive solution is made, soil bearing capacity problems are resolved) -I recommend recognizing the basement curtains instead of beams in the basement floor with a height of 100 cm. Also, in the basement floor There is no diaphragm (floor) formation. It would be appropriate not to accept the floor as rigid. -Soil bearing coefficient of 17500 tf/m3 was entered in the project and it seems that this value is not compatible with the ground class and bearing capacity value. An error may have been made in the unit conversion process. -The beam K16 is not connected to the curtain P01. The beam's joint point is at the bottom corner of the curtain. make the entrance. Good work
 
Back
Top