Ground Safety Issue

D

dedegurban

New Member
Greetings. It will be built in addition to the existing school. I couldn't fix the floor problem. Excuse me? If I have any other mistakes, let me know and I will correct them. Thank you for your interest.
 
hello, there are elements that do not provide the shear safety of column-beam junction.. You can see it if you say reinforced concrete>column>all floors>filter>negative>add and then press OK. good work..
 
"dedegurban":2esl5ndy" said:
Greetings. It will be made in addition to the existing school. I couldn't solve the floor problem. Can you take a look at it? If I have any other mistakes, I will correct them. Thank you for your attention.
Click to expand...
Above I would like to add two things in addition to what friends have written. First, if this is a school, check your floor live loads. Secondly, if this is a building in the case of an addition, I think you should add a solid on it and perform performance analysis again after you get the material information about the lower floors with the core. .
 
I think what my brother NYILMAZ said is the most important thing. it is rather a matter of existing structure evaluation. The additional floor is created according to the new regulations. this is standard project process. on the other hand, the condition of the lower floors is subjected to performance analysis with the new state of the building. In the 7th chapter of tdy2007, it is clear how the core drills etc. will be. The assessment should ensure a) immediate use under design earthquake and b) life safety performance under severe earthquake impact for such buildings. If any of these conditions are not fulfilled, a reinforcement decision is made. If the cost of retrofit + new part to be built corresponds to 30-40% of the cost of rebuilding, a demolition decision can also be made. My suggestion as a working system; 1-Build the current state carrier system of the building. (do the core/cover stripping etc. detail works as specified in the regulation (it is best to work at the intermediate level)) 2-Enter the determined reinforcement diameter/piece/range values and concrete values into the program. and fix/lock reinforcements. beam reinforcement is the reinforcement obtained from 1.4g+1.6q loading. The stirrup spacing is determined by on-site measurement. 3- Be sure to save and store this data separately. this data should remain intact as long as there are no new detections. Create the system to which the upper floor is added with 4-save as. do the analysis. Do not forget to define a new concrete class and reinforcement class for the upper floor. Make a new structure design according to tdy2007. fix the reinforcements of this floor as well. Create a new file to investigate CG performance with 5-save as. Mark the relevant places as stated in the performance analysis preliminary form of the program. (LIFE SAFETY FOR EARTHQUAKE WITH A 2% probability of exceeding in 50 years) 5-save as and create a new file to investigate the HK performance. As indicated in the performance analysis preliminary form of the program, mark the relevant places. (IMMEDIATE USE FOR EARTHQUAKE WITH 10% EXCESSION IN 50 YEARS) one of the following two results a-building provided both performance levels: get well soon. the job ends here. report. Prepare the drawing of the upper floor. b-building did not provide at least one of both performance levels. then empowerment...+over-the-top projects... maybe I've extended it until I get it. My aim is to make a way for friends who come across. or if we have a deficiency, someone should complete it. As for ground safety. There is no recommendation in the regulation for fundamentals in performance analysis. If reinforcement is made, the foundations are reinforced accordingly. If you continue on the road without reinforcement, if there is not a very different stress situation, I say don't care about small violations.. regards...
 
I also reviewed the data. the base has already been entered in the raft. When the superstructure makes an interactive solution, the stress is between 9-10. (q loads are not corrected). There is no problem with the foundation. data is attached. live loads must be at least 350 kg/m2. soil safety stress is written as 177 t/m2. Maybe 17.7... beam loads are wrong. the floor height is 3.50 m and the beams are 0.60 m, so the wall height is 2.90 m. I made the necessary correction in the load library. concrete grade C20/S420 is selected. If the material is like this, nothing will come out of the building anyway. I recommend that you review the ground parameters. but as far as I can see, there is a torsional irregularity in the structure.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top