General questions about wall icon and mod count

[ahmet5410]

hello, I have some questions that I can't solve in my project. 1- When we use the wall icon, does the 'wall load' on the beam get on as an extra or is it automatically removed 2-I get the error that the number of modes is insufficient in my project, it happened later, I couldn't turn it down 3- I have some problems with my column reinforcements, from the ground floor to the roof. it does not decrease the earthquake crosses are working with the logic of throwing on every iron that can be attached. I could not reduce the number of minor and major. It seems like too much. I have to deliver the project after 3 days. I need to deliver the project after 3 days, I would appreciate it if you do not spare your help, thank you my compressed project

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Re: general questions

hello, I have some questions that I couldn't solve in my project 1- Is the 'wall load' on the beam added as an extra when we use the wall icon, or is it automatically removed

Hello , -In case a wall is defined on the beam, the value entered in the wall settings is taken into account as the wall load.The load entered in the beam settings is not taken into account and there is no load repetition. I could not refuse[/quote] If you select Ritz vectors in the modal analysis dialog, the number of available mods will be sufficient.

I have some problems with my 3-column reinforcements, the force from the ground floor to the roof never decreases. It cannot be less than 25fi according to 3.3.4.1. You can examine Figure 3.3. Note: -The operation method cannot be determined because the calculation axis no. 3 is defined incorrectly in the D26 slab in the basement floor.

 

[unver]

Hello. In addition --1. Do not make the narrow sides of the columns that are not connected in the narrow direction in the basement less than 40 cm, (2.8+2.8=5.6 m high) --correct the B errors in the two columns, --The ladder is not untied. Unver ÖZCAN

 

[Technicalman]

Re: general questions

hello, I have some unsolved questions in my project 1- 'wall load' on beam when we use wall icon Is it mounted as an extra or is it removed automatically

Hello, - In case a wall is defined on the beam, the value entered in the wall settings is considered as the wall load. The load entered in the beam settings is not taken into account and there is no load repetition.

2-I get the error that the number of mods is insufficient in my project, it happened afterwards, I couldn't refuse it

If you select Ritz vectors in the modal analysis dialog, the current number of mods will be sufficient.

I have some problems with my 3-column reinforcements. The force from the ground floor to the roof does not decrease at all. It works with the logic of throwing earthquake crossties to every iron that can be attached. I could not reduce the number of minor and major ones. . You can examine Figure 3.3. Note: -The operation method cannot be determined because the calculation axis no. 3 is defined incorrectly on the D26 floor in the basement floor. Define the flooring again.

Mr. Levent, in some application projects, I saw that there is no kipper that I have circled. In those who do, this is not done in almost all of the productions in the market. . I have these kiosks thrown at every construction site that I control, but since no master throws them at other construction sites, there is always a quarrel I wonder your opinion on this matter. Likewise, Unver, I'm curious about your opinion.

 

[unver]

Hello

I have these kiosks thrown at every construction site I control, but there is always a quarrel because no master throws them at other construction sites

The masters are responsible for implementing the project we have given. You are doing the right thing. Even if it is true, continue to apply. Ünver ÖZCAN

 

[Technicalman]

Hello

I have these kilts thrown at every construction site I control, but there is always a quarrel over the implementation of the project we have given, since no master does it at other construction sites

they are liable. You are doing the right thing. Even if you are alone, continue with the right practice. Ünver ÖZCAN

Thank you for your opinion, Mr. Unver, there is no problem in this matter. I was wondering if the longitudinal tie-breakers that are not in the projects interfere with the cad environment? Is something like this possible?

 

[unver]

I'm wondering if the designers with cross-ties, who are not in the projects, intervene in the cad environment? Is such a thing possible? Even if it is dangerous, betrayal to the profession can only be like this. Ünver ÖZCAN

 

[ahmet5410]

I'm wondering if the longitudinally-crossed designers interfere in the cad environment? Is such a thing possible?

The engineer can intervene in the drawings created automatically by the programs in the AutoCAD environment and remove the cross-ties if he wishes. This choice can be made even if it is very wrong and dangerous. Betrayal of the profession is only so much. Ünver ÖZCAN

aah the thing I have the most trouble with is that I'm tired of calling the so-called masters kippers and kilts in all the construction sites that I control, as if they weren't enough, later reductions and interventions started in the office.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Mr. Levent, I saw that some of the application projects did not have the kilt that I circled. In those who do, this is not done in almost all of the productions in the market. There is always a quarrel I am curious about your opinion on this matter Ünver I am also curious about your opinion

-The value of the concrete cover affects the distance between the longitudinal reinforcements and thus the formation of crossties.Concrete cover in the Reinforced Concrete Parameters of the Column 5 If a value of cm or larger is entered, max.ai condition will be met without placing crossties in the long direction.It should be noted that this situation may affect the calculation of the transverse reinforcement for the tightening zone given in Equation 3.1 of TDY 2007 3.3.4.1 Note: -Concrete cover 3 in the project added by Mr. "ahmet5410" In this case, the net concrete cover conditions given in TS 500 Table 9.3 will not be met. reinforcement The distance between the center of gravity and the outermost concrete fiber. Net Concrete Cover: The distance between the outermost reinforcement face and the outermost concrete fiber.(Printed in the Column Preliminary Information report)