Floor drift high - increase system rigidity problem

M

mkrts88

New Member
- I think it's due to the rafter system. column and curtain sections look good.. - There are architectural bases on each floor... you can check it out. How do I make more accurate beaming? or another suggestion? - Thanks in advance, it's very valuable for me to take the time to make suggestions...
 
Hello, In your project, the bed coefficient was entered incorrectly. If you are working as tf/m3 in the program, it would be appropriate to enter approximately 1850. In addition, you can change your working units by pressing the right mouse button on the box where you enter the value. Some notes about your project: -It would be appropriate to enter the settings of the P36 pitch and mark it as a short title pitch. -Your cassette flooring tooth spacing does not meet the criteria specified for double-sided geared flooring according to TS500 11.5. You can review TS500 clauses 11.5 and 11.3.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
-You have supported your stairs together with the structure according to the solution conditions and you have stairs connected to the floor. It would be appropriate to solve it with the assumption of a semi-rigid diaphragm. In addition, the support conditions of the ramp and short stairs on the ground floor are not regulated. -You must connect the K26 beam from the left joint of the P36 curtain. -Rat finite elements do not occur under the S05 column. If you make the left edge of the subamp at the same slope as the S05 column, meshes will be formed. Good work
 
First of all, thanks, I have a few more questions. You should connect the
-K26 beam from the left joint of the P36 curtain.
Click to expand...
I didn't pay much attention, but I thought I did it safely. I did what you said on every floor. What did we fix? No raft finite elements occur under the
-S05 column. If you make the left edge of the lower amplitude with the same slope as the S05 column, the nets will be formed.
Click to expand...
I did not pay attention to the slope, but I made the amplitude to have more space. as a result i created more space
 
I have a few more questions - I understand that I need to make the cassette floor teeth briefly max 70 cm. - Are there any restrictions on the ductility system of this structure according to the regulation?
 
- In order for the analysis model to be formed correctly, the nodal points of the beams connected to the walls in the rigid direction should be arranged at the wall end points. -The problem is not related to the smallness or abundance of your core area. It is an algorithmic situation that the finite element mesh is not formed under the S05 column. To solve this, I suggested that you define the ampacity edge with the same slope as the column. -If you are going to enter data with the cassette command, yes, it should be 70 cm. Examine Yasin's answers in the link I gave in the previous answer. -I recommend you to review TBDY 2018 section 4.3 regarding ductility levels.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top