German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Failed to create floor mesh on ground floor error
- Thread starter erdigoksu
- Start date
Hi My Suggestions: --Delete D14 slab and K30 beam on the ground floor, D15 slab on the basement floor, (also the slab edge on K15) --Rebuild the D14 slab, --Enter D15 and K30 beams on the basement floor, --Short columns have formed in the basement floor. . Delete k15 and k35, make k34 and k16 25/75 beams, --Fit the K29 beam to the curtain, (don't leave it empty.) --If you are going to open a space in the hollow block slab, put a hollow beam on the edge, --If you are going to make a round beam like K01, make arrangements in the drawing. -- Solve the ladder together, Unver ÖZCAN
Mr. Ünver, I tried to implement what you said, but there are a couple of points that I do not understand, the final version of the project is presented in the appendix. --If you are going to make a space in the hollow floor, put a hollow beam on the edge, --If you are going to make a round beam like K01, make arrangements in the drawing. I would appreciate if you could help me how to do these and how to create the floor at +1.09 level.
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
Hello, please review the project.
It will be enough to move the beam carrying the landing on the 1st basement floor. The proposal demo project is attached. Ünver ÖZCAN"erdigoksu":3680b8jx" said:I would appreciate if you can help me how to create the floor at +1.09 level.
In the architectural project, the entrance is made at 0.00 level and there is a landing in front of the elevator at +1.09 level. I could not enter the landing floor at +1.09 level, thank you for your help and attention. I saw your suggestion, thanks for the arc area in the beam connections. Also, I could not connect the columns to each other due to architectural reasons (duplex staircase) on 3 floors."NYILMAZ":28ygkhmv" said:Check the notes in the attached project. Some questions have answers as well as some other questions.
i was able to make the project like this last
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
I still can't identify the landing at level +1.09, really thanks for your helpI'm writing from a tablet right now. But my advice is if you add the architectural project, more logical solutions can be offered. I think that the stair layout on the upper floor should be taken to a different place (the architect can do a different work). I could not understand the condition of the columns in the main stairwell."erdigoksu":6dx9gc3z" said:I was able to get the project like this lastYou do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.I still can't define the landing at +1.09 level, really thanks for your help
Thank you very much Mr. Nedim for your interest and interest. I will add the architectural project. It is a great chance for young individuals like us to benefit from the experiences of our brothers and elders like you. Thank you again.
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
architectural project is attached.HELLO, 1=) FRIENDS WHAT CAN I DO, EXCEPT ENLARGE ON COLUMNS WITHOUT CUTTING SECURITY ? I DON'T WANT TO INCREASE THE COLUMN SIZE? 2=) THERE ARE SOME AREAS WITH 150 CM EXTENSIONS, THERE ARE FRINGES AT 50 CM ON THE LAST SCREEN. THE CONSOLE LENGTH IS 2 M HOW CAN WE SOLVE THIS? IT GIVES A DIFFERENCE FAULT? I ADDED THE PROJECT, IT PROVIDES WHEN S6 COLUMN SIZE IS 40/40, BUT HOW CAN WE BUILD IT IF WE DO 30/30? THANKS NOW FOR YOUR HELP
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
Hello My suggestions;
--No deflection error either,"unalmh":2ckg7lme" said:1=) FRIENDS WHAT CAN I DO ON COLUMNS THAT DO NOT PROVIDE CUT SECURITY . "unalmh":2ckg7lme"]2=) THERE ARE PLACES WITH 150 CM EXTENSIONS, THERE ARE 50 CM FREETS IN THE LAST STAGE, THE CONSOLE LENGTH IS 2 M HOW CAN WE SOLVE IT ?
--Do not change the size of the S6 column, --Make the narrow side of the other columns 30 cm, --Semi-rigid Make a solution, --You can remove the wall loads in the attic and reduce the live loads, --In the attic, lift the K22 beam and start the rib beginning from the H axis, --Make a solution with the ladder, --If you want to save, decrease the raft thickness by 5-10 cm."unalmh":2ckg7lme" said:I ADDED THE PROJECT, IT PROVIDES WHEN S6 COLUMN SIZE IS 40/40 BUT HOW CAN WE BUILD IT IF WE DO 30/30?
YES, DEPENDING DOESN'T LOOK WHEN I MAKE IT THAT WAY, BECAUSE I DIDN'T PUT THE FIT BEAM ON THE J,G,9 AXLES AND I SOLVED IT WITH THE EDGE OF THE FLOOR.. IT DOESN'T HAVE A PROBLEM WHEN I DO IT, AND I DON'T KNOW IF I DID IT RIGHT. THEN I DRAW A 20 PIECE FACE BEAM IN AUTOCAD ENVIRONMENT? WE REQUEST THE DIMENSIONS OF THE COLUMN TO SHALL DUE TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING. THERE IS A BAD TOOTH IN THE ROOM ON THE UPPER FLOOR, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR HELP, Mr. Unver.
You can even make the beam width less (10-15 cm). No need to put reinforcement like beams. Bottom top 1Q8 The purpose is not to leave the hollow filling material empty."unalmh":2mw8vz16" said:SO WHAT DO YOU SAY ABOUT MY WRITING ABOUT THE FACE BEAM IS I DOING WRONG?