Errors that I could not handle in the project

F

fathhh

New Member
Hello there. In the static project we have drawn, there are a few problems we can't find, whether it's because of something that we couldn't handle or something we missed. - On the ground floor; P1 curtain and K12 beam both do not provide shear safety and the reinforcement is insufficient. - On the basement floor; K1 and K4 exceed nmax. The project is in the attached link. Thanks....
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: Unsolvable Errors in the Project.. Hello My Suggestions --You can reduce the live loads on the attic and remove the wall loads, --The ground safety is too low (9 t/m2), consult with the geologist, --The upper rigid floor number curtain You have to take -2 according to the current situation, but if you do not put a curtain around the 1st basement floor, you cannot keep the foundation on such a bad ground. You can put a curtain and then you can get the coefficient -1, --There are consoles like TK22 with ground floor foundation, raft floors like RD2, RD21, RD3 ... and one side free. This is not a suitable solution. Make the foundation raft If I think 40 cm is enough, --Make a solution together with the ladder, --There is a warning of overlapping objects in the geometry control. It should be corrected. After doing these, if there is a problem, we will look again. Unver ÖZCAN
 
Re: Unsolvable Errors in the Project..
"unver":1lkvyc41" said:
Hi My Suggestions --You can reduce the live loads on the attic, you can remove the wall loads, --The ground safety is very low (9 t/m2) geologist Consult with, -- Since the upper rigid floor number is not curtain, you should take -2 according to the current situation, but if you do not put a curtain around the 1st basement floor, you cannot hold the foundation on such a bad ground If you put a curtain, then you can get the coefficient -1,[/b ] --There are consoles like TK22 for ground floor foundation, raft floors such as RD2, RD21, RD3 ... etc. This is not a suitable solution.Make a raft of the foundation around 40 cm if I think it's enough, - -Make a solution together with the ladder, --There is a warning of overlapping objects in the geometry control, it should be corrected. After doing these, we will look again if there is a problem. Ünver ÖZCAN
Click to expand...
Ünver Bey, I talked to the geology and geophysics engineers for ground safety, Ta and Tb value for the parcel they said it would be taken but the values are like that because it's in the basement I don't know what to say about this. As you said, I reduced the rigid floor values and the loads on the roof, but nothing changed, even it gave a B error in 2 columns. Thank you by the way.
 
In my project above, when the selected p1 curtain in the picture is selected, the text appears in the marked place, what is the reason?
 
In the project link you sent, there is no problem in place of the curtain text. If there is still a problem, there has been a situation with the coordinates of the articles in the articles tab, you can fix it from there. In addition, if you have made a correction or editing after the above warnings, it would be useful to send that file. Let's look at the new file and evaluate it accordingly. The issues that Ünver brain warns about are matters that will affect many things. Also :
"fathhh":2in63l5r" said:
..... it seems like I can't do the so-called beamless raft type of foundation due to it being in the basement and due to the ground values. I won't know what you think about this.
Click to expand...
you said here. I don't quite understand what you mean. There doesn't seem to be any obstacle to making rafts without beams. On the contrary, the raft connections with beams appear to be faulty. When you look at the 3D screen, you will see that some continuous foundation beams are not connected anywhere. I have always suspected the ground safety stresses below 1.0. Even when you look at the ground, you can guess that it is problematic enough to be below 1.0. Are there such bad areas in your region, or is it the idea of geologists to stay on the extremely safe side?
 
As you said, Mr. Needim, the ground values of inegol in the region we are in are generally like this, even if we work with different companies, these values are obtained, I want to examine the net values in this way, but it is necessary to engage in a large-scale research. According to these calculations, it is difficult from quantity to workmanship. Thank you, I will try to clarify and provide information.
 
"fathhh":290zbo79" said:
As you said, Mr. Needim, the ground values of inegöl in the region we are in are generally like this, even if we work with different companies, these values come out. According to these calculations, I will try to clarify and give information, thank you.
Click to expand...
Actually, I said so, but there is no need to scrutinize it :) you turn to your floor manager and ask this question, you will see that a lot has changed. "There is a problem with these values are you sure it isn't? The values seem too low to me, values below 1.0, or are you suggesting improvements to the ground? Can you take a look?" You set this sentence and wait, watch what happens :)
 
"NYILMAZ":1ofh3jy2" said:
"fathhh":1ofh3jy2" said:
As you said, Mr. Needim, the ground values of inegol in the region we are in are generally like this, even though we work with different companies, these values come out, so I want to examine the net values in this way, but I want to narrow it down broadly extensive research is required. According to these calculations, it is difficult from quantity to workmanship. Thank you. "Are you sure there is no problem with these values? The values seem very low to me, values below 1.0, or do you suggest improvement on the ground? Can you take a look?" install and wait, watch what happens :)
Click to expand...
I'll try what you said, nedim bey:) ünver bey, and as you said, I made a raft foundation. Could you please check the lack of reinforcement error by entering the additional reinforcement tab, reducing the reinforcement intervals and this way the error disappears. But when the analysis is done again, the error is It reappears(RD2). I would appreciate it if you could help in a little urgent, thanks..link is below
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top