different column reinforcements in a symmetrical building

[etriye]

First of all, I wish you a good work guys, I'm dealing with a project now I've started to examine the workmanship and applicability parts of the job, but there are a few problems that I can't think of, is it normal for the column reinforcements in symmetry to be different in a building that can be considered as symmetrical in the middle, is it normal. Also, in the part where the curtains are in the middle, the shear force does not save the shear force, but above the basement there is a serious decrease in reinforcement on the curtain on the ground floor, I await your comments and wish you a good work

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[sereze]

Re: equip different columns in a symmetrical building in colonapplication Your building is symmetrical in only one axis, and the symmetry axis does not coincide with the x or y axis, so different forces may occur at +-5% eccentricity loadings. There is a problem with the curtain you mentioned, but I couldn't figure out what the problem was.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Re: equip different columns in a symmetrical building in colonapplication

first of all, I wish you a good work guys, I'm dealing with a project now I started to examine the workmanship and applicability parts of the job, but there are a few problems that do not lie in my mind. In a building that can be considered symmetrical, do you think it is normal that the column reinforcements in symmetry are different, and the shear force in the section where the curtains are in the middle part does not save the shear force and there is a serious decrease in the reinforcement on the ground floor above the basement floor, I await your comments and wish you a good work

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Hello, The following are the findings and suggestions for data entry in your project: *There is no perimeter curtains on the 1st basement floor. Upper rigid basement floor It is appropriate to enter the number -2. *Continuous foundations entered under panel elements are incorrect. Continuous foundations are not connected to the joint points of the panels. (For example, TK173, ST21, ST38, ST75, ST76 etc...) Also, foundations are connected to columns such as S10-S14. *The model you created has cantilever foundations of 5.5 meters in length and continuous foundations that were only used to create raft slabs. (TK175, TK170, TK156 etc.) *Continuous foundations should generally be used to transfer the loads from columns and walls to the ground. *In the program, superstructure interactive solution is foreseen for beamless raft foundation systems. Good work

 

[etriye]

Re: equip different columns in a symmetrical building in colonapplication thank you for your interest, Mr. Levent, there was an error caused by the nodes. I bought the axles directly from the architecture, so I think there is a problem due to the numbers after the comma. do you solve? ie -->> in a rafter raft system, would it be wrong or would we be on the safe side when the superstructure was analyzed interactively?

 

[NYILMAZ]

Re: equip different columns in a symmetrical building in colonnaplication If I were you, I would solve beamless raft, not beamed raft. Same dimensions as yours and more economical. Easy to implement, less likely to make mistakes.