Difference in crosses

ottomancagatay

New Member
In the project I made with the 10.03 version, I used 10 gauge iron in stirrups so that each column would not draw a cross on the sprout iron, so that it would decrease, when I re-analyzed with the version 10.05 published today, all column sprouts were drawn as crosses, and it also gave an ace error on the beams. What is the reason?
 
Hello, The distance between the cross tie arms is 25Ø condition in the columns. This check has been fixed with version 10.05.
 
Works for version 10.05 : 1. In the TBDY 2018 wizard, the parameters of DD-3 can be seen and changed for the relative story drift control in the design spectra tab. The changed parameters are used in the background only for the relative story offset. 2. Added the layout for tracking calculation results in the build tree. Results of the whole structure or elements can be obtained from the list added in the Results folder in the structure tree. 3. During the analysis, the information on whether Ritz or Eigen was used in the modal analysis stages is given in the analysis status window. 4. When a joint is made on one end of any secondary beam to the main beam, when the same connection is made on the other end of the same secondary beam, the joint is automatically formed in the same direction as the other end. (Tolga Aydöner) 5. According to TBDY 2018 article 4.9.1.4, the lambda value used in the relative story drift calculation is displayed both in the relative story offsets report and in the analysis settings dialog. 6. In the analysis settings, the option whether to apply TBDY 2018 4.3.2.4 to all curtain wall systems has been added. 7. Adjustments were made in the analysis settings report within the scope of TBDY 2018. Adjustments were made in the preliminary information section of the 8th Act report. 9. Adjustments were made in the preliminary information section of the beam report. The term Roof has been changed to Elevator/Engine Room in the 10th Floor general settings. 11. "Calculate contour" command was not working in case of floors without carrier element in the project. It works now. The schematic representation in the 12th generation combination resources tab was incorrect. Fixed. 13. The building floor maximum loads printed in the dynamic analysis report were removed because they were not used. 14. Some columns were not supposed to be connected to the rigid diaphragm in the project. It looked connected. Fixed. (Şükrü Şahin) 15. The case that the load information page is blank in the secondary steel beam report in the project has been fixed. 16. Steel exposure settings command icon has been changed. 17. R lover and Space lover commands are added to the drop-down list under the lover command in the ribbon menu. 18. In the TBDY 2018 wizard, the selection of coefficients shown in Table 4.1, where R and D coefficients are selected for high ductility level in steel selection, has been adjusted. 19. In the TBDY 2018 wizard, steel structures have been made selectable for high ductility C11 structure type, BYS>3. 20. When you want to close the window without completing the TBDY 2018 account wizard, the warning text was in English, it was made in Turkish. (Erhan Mollaoğlu) 21. In the floor classes table in the TBDY 2018 wizard, the values of the ZE floor class do not appear the same as the regulation. 22. In the TBDY 2018 wizard, for structures without DTS=3 and DTS=4 4 class, the ductility level limited option in case of single-direction threaded flooring is turned off. 23. The situation in which the tie is not thrown in the column within the 25fi condition has been corrected. 24. The tie beam adherence ratio control report has been included in the general report of the earthquake code. 25. Ladder information text was not appearing in the ribbon menu. It's out now. 26. Displaying large blocks in red while drawing objects slowed down the work. In blocks, this notation has been removed and now only walls, beams, lines, etc. displayed for objects such as (Forum servany2) 27. Section page DWG was not exported. The program was crashing and closing. Fixed (Erhan Mollaoğlu) 28. An explanation for Ez(G) has been added in the descriptions of loading and combinations in the report. 29. The revision in the report title and the version information were conflicting. Editing done. 30. Explanation visual of the slab in-plane shear and stress control report has been renewed. 31. The R coefficient selection reason image in the general report of earthquake regulations has been renewed. 32. Visuals of individual and continuous basic reports were renewed within the scope of TBDY 2018 regulation. 33. The project would sometimes break while opening, sometimes while analyzing. Fixed. (Yusuf Yılmaz's project) 34. The situation where displacements and relative displacement limit values change in the relative displacement report in consecutive analysis has been corrected. 35. Fixed the program crash when closing the post analysis settings dialog in the TBDY 2018 wizard. 36. The ground class changed in the basic ground tab did not change on the TBDY 2018 spectrum page. Fixed. 37. In the project, the free mass of the building, which was given in the dynamic analysis report entry information section, seemed larger than the total weight of the building. Fixed. 38. Items 4.3.2.4a and 4.3.2.4b controls were not seen in the project's tipping moment control report. Fixed. (Emre Sevim) 39. In the projects, the situations where the shear forces of the continuous foundation shear forces were large in the rafter raft foundation system were resolved. (Wheel structure, Selahattin Bektaş, Özge Öncü) 40. The cases where the curtain contours are missing on the curtains that intersect with the soil curtains on the basement floor have been corrected. 41. Equations (4B.7) and (4B.2.4) used in the calculation of the largest base tipping moment encountered in some projects have been developed.
 
Back
Top