Difference between Probina and Ide Static

[basakhasan]

Hi, I've previously troubleshooted another thread. There doesn't seem to be a problem in the solution, but the company that solves our project on the probe calculates the reinforcement and sections (especially) on the radial by 30% more. We, as users of Ide Statik, fell into conflict again. Since I couldn't find any documents on the elevator pit, I designed the elevator shaft by creating a flat floor and then a floor space. however, I haven't come across any problems other than a couple of minor issues. I wonder if I am making a mistake with the loads (wall loads). I would be very grateful if the users and administrators would examine the project and inform me about the errors. Hasan BAŞAK Civil Eng. KTU 2007 file link:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[NYILMAZ]

I don't know what you compared to what. Even if you enter a parameter differently, the results will be very different from each other. For example, you entered the upper rigid basement floor number incorrectly. According to this system, it will be -5. You gave -1. On this occasion you are B1, B2, B3, B4. You say that the floors are rigid floors and are held by curtains like underground. But your system doesn't say so. I don't see a occupied floor. We can't say anything about your assumptions about loads. For example, you do not seem to have implemented a solution for wall bearing floors. Or you did not put different load types such as balconies and stair corridors. Are the accessories in the ide or more in the other program? For example, the issues I wrote above will increase your earthquake loadings and your fixed loadings. In addition, I recommend that the vertical calculation axis of the raft slab pass completely. Or maybe you should cross the account axis with different intervals from many points. Although your ground values are high and it is a 4th degree earthquake zone, I still think that 70 cm raft height will not be enough for a 14-storey building. Even in this state, the curtains are not in a position to meet the shear forces. I recommend adding curtains to the system. Especially your x-direction curtains are missing. Some beams do not center the columns. (eg: 41 42 44 45) I think there is a problem with the K45 beam. The perspective seems reversed. Delete and re-enter. The 4th basement beam K30 (the beam connecting the columns P12, S4) seems to be incorrectly connected.