Deflection of Beams in Long Span Project

E

emir16

New Member
Have a nice day; In the attached project, the landlord does not want a column in the middle, since the ground floor will be a solid shop. The parcel is adjacent. When we place the system in accordance with the architect, a deflection error occurs in most of the beams. In addition, ts500 11.3.2 warning appears in the geometric control. I can only solve the geometric control by throwing an auxiliary beam in the middle. However, the beam I put forward does not have a positive effect on the deflection. I'm sending you undiscarded carpets of these. If you have the opportunity to examine the project, you will already see the problems. I need to open more lighting spaces. But I couldn't go to that stage because I couldn't solve the problem. By the way, the parcel is in the 1st earthquake zone. Thank you for your help in advance. the project is in the extension in the Appendix.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
In terms of beam dimensions, of course, it is not possible to solve this span with this beam height. They say it belongs to Allah to give without taking. You will not compromise anything, you will not want a column, you will not raise the beam, you will want to solve it with a single span... Then it is the deflection, the insufficiency of the section, etc... Of course you will encounter it. After all, the material you use is reinforced concrete?!
 
Hello My suggestions; --In the calculation output, the 1st floor and ground floor offset error is too high. -thickness of the columns on the left side has been increased, -ribs, -roof wall loads, floor loads, -K10 beam gave an error when the calculation was made, and that was corrected. After the calculation, the general report of the earthquake regulation is received without any errors. The problem does not appear. There is a point here; Warnings in geometry control: TS 500 11.3.2 for floors running in a straight line. there is an error message. Shouldn't be considered when yours is a cassette tape. Considering the cassette height and beams should be approximately 48 cm (L/20). Even if it was me, would I have passed this way even if the account saved it ?????????? Unver ÖZCAN Corrected project is attached
 
Wide gaps can be passed, I have no objection to this, but it is not right for me to say thank you to such a system and try to solve the problem here because of the nature of the contractor.
 
I did a similar build (openness much less than that) years ago. It was a long slender structure with a partially single span. In the 12 November earthquake, when there were many buildings, the first building I got up and looked at was that building. Thankfully nothing happened (we were already far from the epicenter of the earthquake. I wouldn't have done the same thing today, I guess). But I must say that; I'd say it's better to stay awake than to have nightmares. By acting according to the heart of others, do not put them or yourself at risk. We passed larger concrete openings, of course. But we tried to act within the engineering science and formation while choosing elements such as the building system, geometry, dimensions, etc.
 
The civil engineer's test by fire (Regulations-specifications, architectural project, program, contractor, ground, concrete, etc.) this must be it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top