CURTAIN SLIPPING SAFETY PROBLEM

M

mehmetserhat

New Member
I am using IDE ver 5.511, it warns that curtain slip safety is not provided in the project I am doing, I made the necessary arrangements after the analysis, there is no problem, but the control of the highways should be re-analyzed and not in this way and this should be without error after the analysis, can you help me with this, I wonder if you can help me, thanks in advance
 
Hi, enter the Reinforced Concrete menu, Reinforcement Selection command, this section contains the diameters to be used in Reinforced Concrete elements. You may have made some restrictions on curtain reinforcement here. You may have chosen to use only fi8 reinforcement for curtain stirrups and end zone stirrups. eg. If the problem disappears when you manually change the horizontal rebars from fi8 to fi10 after the analysis, if you enable fi10 in the Reinforced Concrete Reinforcement Selection dialog, these rebars will be selected by the program after the analysis. No error will be given after the analysis. If you fix this problem by changing the rebar spacing other than the rebar diameter. Reinforcement spacing conditions are calculated by taking into account the min/max stirrup spacing in the Reinforced Concrete menu --> Parameters --> Column or Panel parameters and the conditions in the Earthquake regulations. These conditions are defined in accordance with the regulation. In this case, the section increase may be the solution.
 
hello, I did not make the edits as you said. After the analysis was over, I deleted the faulty curtains and floors, then placed them again, first I did only the slab analysis, then I clicked on the curtain tab from the reinforced concrete menu, selected the new curtains I placed and clicked the reinforced concrete button, and the problem was solved. However, as I said in my previous message, the control wants no errors in the project after the analysis. I added the project first, if you look at the reports without analyzing, you will see that there is no problem, then if you analyze and look at the reports, you will see the errors.
 
"mehmetserhat":3er41vmr" said:
After the analysis was finished, I deleted the curtains and floors that gave errors, then placed them again, first I did only the floor analysis, then I clicked on the curtain tab from the reinforced concrete menu, selected the new curtains I placed and clicked the reinforced concrete button. [/ quote] You don't have the right to do this, because when you delete the curtains, reposition them and press the reinforced concrete button, you will have placed minimum reinforcement on those curtains. The ductility level of your project is selected as normal. In systems with normal ductility level, the design shear design force of the curtains is penalized by multiplying by 2. Therefore, the shearing force of the curtains is penalized by multiplying the slip safety in your system You can look at the results by getting a curtain report. The security error of the program is an error that you need to take precautions. However, beyond that, we need to examine whether you can solve the system normally. There are bap curtains under the right circle on the ceiling of the 1st basement floor, but they do not continue on the left part. Rij I guess that's why you entered the basement number (-1). However, according to TDY, curtains that continue throughout the entire floor can be included in the calculation of alfas. When you get the rigir basement number (-1), these curtains are added to the alfas account. However, it should be the other way around. If these curtains are not included in the alphas calculation, there are almost no curtains in the x direction in that system; 1. The shear force ratio will decrease below 0.40 in the x direction. Since it is not 0.75, you do not have the right to solve this system as a normal system with ductility level. 2. Also, since the odds will be below 0.40, you cannot mix the system. 3. It remains to choose a system with a high ductility level, and your system will be subjected to more severe conditions. You will have to strengthen the system, especially by adding curtains that continue to the top. What can we do? 1. You can get the rigid basement number 0 as there are partial bap curtains on the ground floor. 2. In this case, you can try with the lowest R=5.22 for mixed systems. The x-direction alphas ratio is 0.38. In order to solve the mixed system, you can add shears to provide 0.40 in x direction.
Click to expand...
 
I also looked at your base system. You have made a single slab definition by defining a continuous foundation from the outside of the building: 1. If you have a continuous foundation in your system, you must connect all columns with a continuous foundation. If the continuous foundation heights cannot be higher than the slab, you define the continuous foundations as hidden beams if they recover. or 2. You define the system as a complete beamless raft (I recommend). For this, you can pass a raft slab edge around the structure and define a single plaque. You can make regional reinforcement in your foundation by defining more than one reinforced concrete calculation axle and adjusting the working distances. Good luck with...
 
When I get a general report from the optional reports in the attached project, the horizontal shear wall reinforcements change significantly. These changes can also be seen in the reinforced concrete curtain tab. I am using ide 5.511 and working on vista. When we analyze again, the curtain body reinforcements are restored. but I think the beam detail drawings have changed since I reanalyzed Also, I can't get a general report because of this.
 
Hello If you get a report without ticking the Element end forces (Global) line in the Optional Reports Dialog, your problem will be solved.
 
The element end strengths (global) line is already unchecked. Even if I get that report, the basement curtains exceed the slip safety limit. I'm running into a bigger problem.
 
Hello, I open your project that you have added to the forum, I do analysis, I click on optional reports. (with settings in capture1.jpg). The program doesn't give me any negatives... (capture.jpg) Can you post some screenshots so we can better understand your problem? We will try to help you if you make explanations such as click this, do this, etc., respectively. Good luck with..
 
At first glance, it doesn't seem to be negative, yes. but if you look at the horizontal body reinforcements of the curtains in the report, there are fi14/25 ones. many have changed. in the same way, if you look at the shear reinforcements in the reinforced concrete tab, it is seen that the horizontal body reinforcements have changed there as well. If you analyze again, you see that the horizontal body reinforcements are fi8. When you receive reports from the optional reports in this way, the diameters of the horizontal body reinforcements increase again. there is such a problem. I'm out right now, if it's not clear, I'll upload a picture and explain in more detail when I get to the office...
 
Hello again, I found your question. In 5, some TDY conditions are applied when getting the report. For this reason, the earthquake code column report causes changes in the wall horizontal reinforcements. Of course, first of all, we will consider the horizontal reinforcement values given as a result of the calculation. For this reason, it is necessary to cancel that option in the optional report and just get the report. Especially after receiving the wall drawings and wall reports, we will issue the earthquake code column report as the final report. Thus, the report and stirrup results will look compatible with each other. Since the report works have been rearranged in version 6, the process of making the account, report and drawing appear in harmony with each other has already been ensured. I wish you a good work,
 
Thank you for your interest, Mr. I have already completed the project with ide 6. Let's install the beta and see how it is...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top