Curtain shear forces

emrebagdu

New Member
IN MY PROJECT, THERE ARE SUB-BASMAN CURTAINS ON THE BASEMENT, BUT I GET ERROR THAT THE PROGRAM IS SELECTED "NORMAL SYSTEM IS SELECTED AND THE RATIO OF THE TOTAL CUTTING FORCES TO THE BASE CUTTING FORCE TO THE BASE CUTTING FORCES IS 0.75 MINOR." FOR 60 COLUMNS IT GIVES 10F14 IN THE BASEMENT AND ON THE FLOOR IT GIVES 14F14 ON THE OTHER FLOORS, I WOULD LIKE TO HELP ME WITH THE FOLLOWING OF THIS PROBLEM.. THANKS
 
"emrebagdu":2r6ctc61" said:
THERE ARE INFRINGEMENT CURTAINS ON THE BASEMENT FLOOR IN MY PROJECT, BUT THE PROGRAM HAS BEEN SELECTED AS A NORMAL SYSTEM AND THE RATIO OF THE TOTAL CUTTING FORCES TO THE BASE CUTTING POWER IS 0.75. ] Hello, AlphaS>0.75 warning in the project is given due to P01, P02, P03 elevator curtains. In normal ductile systems, the program checks whether the shear force/total shear force ratio on the curtains is greater than 0.75. For detailed information, TDY item 2.5.1 , 2.5.2, 2.5.3 2.5.4 and Table 2.6 can be examined
"emrebagdu":2r6ctc61" said:
TOGETHER THE BODRUM FLOOR GIVES COLUMN REINFORCEMENT LESS THAN OTHER FLOORS, FOR example, 25/ FOR 60 COLUMNS, IT GIVES 10F14 IN THE BASEMENT AND ON THE FLOOR IT GIVES 14F14 ON OTHER FLOORS, I WOULD LIKE TO HELP ME WITH THE SOLVING OF THIS PROBLEM. THANKS
More reinforcement may be needed on the upper floors due to the decrease in normal force and moment effect. This indicates that the columns are strained. As a solution, an arrangement can be made in the Column Reinforced Concrete dialog so that the reinforcement of the basement floor is the same as the upper floors, or an arrangement can be made in the carrier system to ensure less reinforcement in the columns. (Column dimensions can be enlarged, column directions can be changed, new vertical carrier elements can be added, etc...) Note It is recommended to model panel objects as shells. Good work
 
Thank you for your interest, Mr. Hakan. I am solving a project with a 1350 m2 session in 2 layers. Do you think 14 minutes is normal for dio analysis?
 
"vuralmüh":1d40qvv6" said:
thanks for your interest, Mr. Hakan. I am solving a project with a .1350 m2 area in 2 layers. Do you think 14 minutes is normal for diode analysis?
The time may vary depending on the number of node points. Especially half If you are solving with a rigid diaphragm , the time will be longer than the fully rigid solution since the slabs are included in the analysis.In addition, if there is a raft without beams in the system and you are solving superstructure-foundation interaction, the time will be shortened or extended depending on these options.
 
Back
Top